Original Articles

Ansar Abbasi: Nawaz Sharif must refrain from political reconciliation with the PPP.

This site has moved to https://lubpak.net/archives/26784, click this link if you are not redirected

About the author

Abdul Nishapuri


Click here to post a comment
  • Hasty and Partial Pakistani TV analyst

    Friday, 06 March, 2009, 14:07 GMT 19:07 PST


    Jingoism and Plagiarism in Pakistani Media:

    Hamid Mir Calamity & Geo TV.


    Calamity of Dr Shahid Masood & TV Anchors – 1


    Calamity of Dr Shahid Masood & TV Anchors – 2


    Excellent 'IQ' of Dr Shahid Masood of GEO TV


    Aamir Liaquat Hussain's Love for Islam.


  • Monday, 9 March 2009
    Ansar Abbasi: Nawaz Sharif must refrain from political reconciliation with the PPP.

    Daily Dawn dated 16 December 2000.

    Sharifs lose 80pc of assets, says Qureshi BY Ansar Abbasi

    Week Ending : 16 December 2000 Issue : 06/48


    ISLAMABAD, Dec 10: The exile of the Sharif family to Saudi Arabia
    following the pardon announcement by the government, has deprived
    the Raiwind dwellers of their 15 assets, worth billions of rupees.

    A spokesman for the government, Maj-Gen Rashid Qureshi, told Dawn
    on Monday that almost 80 per cent of the Sharifs’ property had been
    “taken over” by the government.

    According to Mr Qureshi, the 15 assets that have been taken over by
    the government in return for providing a safe “exit” to the Sharif
    family include Rs300 million in cash; industrial assets including
    Brother Steel Mills; Ilyas Enterprises; Hudaybia Paper Mill;
    Hudaybia Engineering Company; Hamza Spinning Mills; residential
    property including the Model Town bungalow; three houses at Mall
    Road Murree; property at 135 Upper Mall Lahore; a plot at Model
    Town Lahore; a plot at Upper Mall, Lahore; agricultural property
    including 10.2 kanals of land at Khanpur Sheikhupura Road Lahore;
    41 acres and 7 kanals of land at Sheikhupura; 14.2 kanals of land
    and another 35 kanals at Bhaipharu in Chunnian and 88 kanals of
    land at Raiwind.

    The Raiwind palace of the Sharif family, which ruled the country
    for almost 15 years, has however not been confiscated by the

    Mr Qureshi dispelled the impression that there had been any
    underhand deal between the government and the Sharif family. He
    said the government had simply responded to the repeated mercy
    petitions filed by the Sharifs.

    Contrary to what the Sharifs were pretending before the public and
    in their statements to the media, Mr Qureshi said they had been
    writing to the government including the chief executive and the
    president, appealing for pardon.

    “We were receiving their requests for mercy in the past three to
    four months particularly after the courts handed over decisions
    against Nawaz Sharif,” he said.

    These requests were renewed recently following Nawaz Sharif’s
    reported ailment. Mr Qureshi stated that since the chief executive
    had repeatedly said that he was not vindictive so he recommended to
    President Tarar that the imprisonment of the Sharifs be pardoned
    and turned into exile while the rest of the punishments including
    fines, forfeiture of property and disqualification should stay.

    When told that the people in streets felt as if they had been
    betrayed by the government for allowing a safe exit to the Sharifs,
    the government spokesman said, “the government has actually taken a
    compassionate view of the situation and converted the imprisonment
    into exile.”

    Qureshi dispelled the impression that a “deal” was ‘brokered’
    either by a Saudi prince or was the exit the consequence of Saudi
    Arabia’s pressure.


  • Blast from Past.

    Daily Dawn dated 16 December 2000.

    Week Ending : 16 December 2000 Issue : 06/48

    NATIONAL NEWS 20001210

    President pardons Nawaz; entire Sharif family exiled by Nasir Malick and Faraz Hashmi


    ISLAMABAD, Dec 9: President Rafiq Tarar has pardoned former prime
    minister Nawaz Sharif’s 25-year jail sentence but exiled the former
    prime minister and his family, a government announcement said in
    the wee hours of Sunday.

    “On the advice of the chief executive, the president of Pakistan,
    according to law has pardoned Nawaz Sharif’s remaining jail
    sentence while the rest of the punishment awarded by the honourable
    courts, which includes fine, forfeiture of property and
    disqualification from public office would remain in place,” the
    announcement said.

    “Nawaz Sharif and family have been exiled to Saudi Arabia. This
    decision has been taken in the best interest of the country and the
    people of Pakistan,” it said.

    The former prime minister was awarded 14 years’ imprisonment on
    corruption charges, fined Rs20 million and disqualified from
    contesting election for 21 years. Mr Sharif, who was removed by the
    army in a bloodless coup, was sentenced to life imprisonment on
    charges of hijacking the plane in which General Pervez Musharraf
    was travelling. He had appealed in the high court, which had
    rejected the plea. He was fined Rs500,000 and forfeiture of
    property worth Rs500 million.

    The official announcement said that Nawaz Sharif and his family had
    been appealing to the chief executive and the president of Pakistan
    requesting clemency. They had also filed a petition requesting for
    waiver of punishment awarded by the Sindh High Court and the
    accountability court in the helicopter case.

    “Nawaz Sharif and his family had pleaded his falling health and
    need of specialist medical care urgently requesting that he may be
    allowed to proceed abroad for treatment. The Sharif family had also
    submitted that they be allowed to accompany him,” the announcement

    SAUDI ROLE: Indirectly admitting that the deal had been brokered by
    Saudi Arabia, the announcement said that recently, Pakistan’s
    closest friend Saudi Arabia offered the Government of Pakistan to
    accept the Sharif family for medical treatment on humanitarian
    grounds if exiled to their country.

    Sources said that Saudi defence minister and former intelligence
    chief Prince Turki Al Faisal, arrived in Islamabad “this morning on
    a special plane and held detailed talks with the military
    government officials as well as with Begum Kulsoom Nawaz at the
    residence of Saudi ambassador to Pakistan.

    The Saudi prince, according to Raja Zafarul Haq, also met Nawaz
    Sharif in Attock jail this afternoon along with Begum Kulsoom
    Nawaz, to give final touches to the deal. Nawaz Sharif, according
    to latest reports, has been brought from Attock Fort and admitted
    to the Armed Forces Institute of Cardiology in Rawalpindi.

    Sources in the Pakistan Muslim League claimed that Nawaz Sharif was
    averse to leaving the country but his son Hasan Nawaz, who is now
    in London, has played a decisive role in convincing his father to
    accept the deal.

    These sources said that under the deal, Nawaz Sharif and his family
    would not return to Pakistan for 10 years. The deal has fuelled
    speculations about the restoration of the suspended assemblies.

    However, some political analysts believe that an interim political
    structure will be established in the country and the army will step
    down after ensuring “due share” in the new political structure.


  • Another Blast from Past

    Daily Dawn dated 16 December 2000.

    Week Ending : 16 December 2000 Issue : 06/48

    Nawaz pardoned on Saudi Arabia’s request, says CE by Ihtasham ul Haque


    ISLAMABAD, Dec 13: Chief Executive General Pervez Musharraf has
    said that the decision to pardon Nawaz Sharif has been taken in the
    larger national interest and in consideration of a request made by
    Pakistan’s closest and brotherly country Saudi Arabia.

    He expressed these views on Wednesday while briefing the federal
    cabinet on the government action of pardoning the former Prime
    Minister. Official sources said that the CE defended his decision
    and said that time had come to bring to an end the politics of
    revenge and confrontation. He said he did not have anything
    personal against anybody and that the nation should be saved from
    the confrontational course.

    Official sources said that most members of the federal cabinet
    requested the chief executive to make public Mr Sharif’s request
    for pardon.

    However, these members endorsed the government decision on the
    matter and felt that the move would reduce polarization and bring
    about harmony on the political scene. The chief executive, who
    presided over the meeting, said though the presidential pardon
    remitted the former prime minister’s rigorous imprisonment, it did
    not waive off his disqualification from holding political office
    and the imposition of fines.

    The sources said that Gen Musharraf pointed out that now the
    economy of the country would improve, bringing relief to the common

    He said the action would boost the stock market which otherwise had
    been showing a downward trend for the last many months.

    He said he had earlier briefed the corps commanders on the release
    of Mr Sharif and told them that his decision would improve
    political climate in the country.

    The sources said that CE told the meeting that it was wrong to say
    that Mr Sharif did not seek pardon as had been claimed by some
    members of his family. He agreed with the cabinet members that the
    deal should be made public to dispel such an impression.

    He said the government was considering making the deal public,
    adding that the action had been taken with good intentions and he
    had full support of his senior military colleagues. The sources
    said that the CE told the meeting that his military colleagues had
    endorsed his views that the country needed to be rid of the
    politics of confrontation.

    The chief executive said those who thought that the government had
    lost its credibility or become weak because of the action were
    wrong. The CE assured the cabinet members that he would continue to
    take them into confidence on all major national and international

    The cabinet approved ratification of the agreement establishing an
    Advisory Centre on the WTO law.

    The cabinet kept in pending the issue of eight to 10 per cent
    increase in the prices of petroleum products and the matter would
    now be discussed in the next meeting.


  • Multiple Blasts from the Past:

    Nawaz exile to usher in harmony: CE
    by Nasir Malick

    23 December 2000 Issue : 06/49


    ISLAMABAD, Dec 20: Chief Executive General Pervez Musharraf on
    Wednesday, justified his decision of sending Nawaz Sharif into
    exile, saying it would usher in an era of political harmony and
    economic development.

    The General divided his hour-long speech to the nation on radio and
    television in two parts — justifying his action of sending Nawaz
    Sharif and his family into exile in the first half and explaining
    his government’s devolution plan in the second.

    Dressed in commando uniform, the General spoke in Urdu using
    English sentences excessively, in what appeared to be an attempt to
    reach the international audience simultaneously.

    The CE also accused both Nawaz Sharif and Ms Benazir Bhutto of
    working against the military government’s “devolution plan” and
    gave an impression as if the decision of sending Nawaz Sharif was
    indirectly related to this issue as well.

    He said: “There must have been some good reason that I took this
    decision.” He, however, did not explain those reasons. “There is a
    difference between a popular decision and a correct decision,” he
    said indirectly saying that his decision was correct.

    The CE also accepted that a Saudi prince had intervened to seek the
    release of Nawaz Sharif.

    Accusing the Nawaz and Benazir governments of institutionalizing
    corruption, he said, “all institutions were corrupted by the two
    parties, I will not name those institutions because all of you
    understand what I mean.”

    Ignoring the basic principle of politics that today’s foes could be
    friends tomorrow, the General accused Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz
    Sharif of trying to join hands.

    Without naming them, he said: “Two political leaders, Pakistan’s
    political stalwarts, who hated each other till yesterday, were
    shamelessly trying to join hands in an attempt to jointly loot the
    country, if anything had been left from looting.”

    Similarly, he also regretted that veteran politician Nawabzada
    Nasrullah Khan (without naming him) had been helping and supporting
    these leaders to come closer and once again loot the country.

    Defending his decision, the General claimed that it had been
    appreciated and acknowledged internationally.

    On the issue of dealing with political leadership, General
    Musharraf took a completely different line from what was taken by
    his predecessor General Ziaul Haq, who had sent a deposed prime
    minister to the gallows.

    “Extreme actions against the political leaders do not go well with
    the international community as such (extreme) actions are
    considered (a sign of) backwardness and rigidity,” he explained.
    “Besides they (extreme actions) have a negative impact on foreign

    He indirectly hinted that several investment-related issues were
    also linked with this decision and especially mentioned that the
    long-standing dispute with Hubco, whose majority shares are owned
    by a Saudi national, was resolved after sending Nawaz Sharif into

    Similarly, he said, since sending Nawaz Sharif into exile, many
    international investors had shown great interest in the purchase of
    Pakistan Telecommunications.


    Exile deal made govt unpopular: NYT


    23 December 2000 Issue : 06/49


    NEW YORK, Dec 17: General Pervez Musharraf’s decision to let former
    prime minister Nawaz Sharif go into exile “is only part of the
    disillusionment with his rule, which was initially greeted with an
    almost giddy hope that a tough-guy military man could whip the
    country into shape,” the New York Times said in an article on

    “Mr Musharraf promised nothing short of Pakistan’s moral and
    economic rejuvenation when he took power, but he has found it very
    difficult to deliver, particularly on people’s bread-and- butter
    hopes. At a time of political uncertainty, both foreign and
    domestic investment in the country have lagged,” the newspaper

    The New York Times observed that “already Gen Musharraf is feeling
    the discontent of the public and the press, largely because there
    is an absence of fear about speaking out against his government”.

    It also noted that “the military dictators of earlier eras crushed
    dissent. But the current rulers have tolerated scathing press
    criticism. Perhaps it is because Gen Musharraf is more liberal. Or
    perhaps it is because they fear a crackdown would up- end their
    cooperative relationships with international lenders on whom
    Pakistan depends financially”.

    “Fourteen months into Gen Musharraf’s rule, the military – often
    described here as Pakistan’s last viable, effective institution –
    stands demystified. Most people still credit the general with good
    intentions, but he is often depicted as a bumbler whose government
    has been too weak to halt sectarian killings or to stand up to
    Islamic fundamentalists,” the paper said.

    However, the New York Times said that “the general has one big
    thing going for him: the lack of an inspiring civilian leader to
    challenge him. Benazir Bhutto, who was Mr Sharif’s main national
    rival for power, has been convicted on corruption charges and is
    living in London. And now the general has removed Mr Sharif from
    Pakistan – and in such a way that Mr Sharif’s character has been
    further discredited.”

    The paper says that “members of Mr Sharif’s party, the Pakistan
    Muslim League, say he was a man accustomed to a life of luxury and
    power who apparently could not tolerate the rigours of prison life.
    He had always had it easy. He rose to positions of power in the
    1980s with the backing of the military. He and his family amassed
    fabulous wealth during his time in office”.

    “He loved being chauffeured in a black Mercedes. He had a taste for
    expensive watches and fancy shoes. Before the coup, he was close to
    moving into a 22-room mansion with stuffed lions and rococo
    furniture,” Shaikh Rashid, a former minister in Sharif’s cabinet,
    told the New York Times.


  • Ansar Abbasi: Nawaz Sharif must refrain from political reconciliation with the PPP.

    I forgot to mention earlier that the house in which Aitzaz Ahsan lives was built by Former Deputy Director FIA, Ahmed Riaz Sheikh in mid 90s and Fascist Weekly Magazine Takbeer used to publish this after Farooq Laghari dismissed second Benazir Bhutto government in 1996. Recent news against Ahmed Riaz Sheikh by Ansar Abbasi in The News International is just an effort to settle some old score.

    PML leaders being excluded from Ehtesab process by Ansar Abbasi

    26 April 1997 Issue : 03/17


    ISLAMABAD, April 25: Government agencies involved in the accountability exercise are said to be avoiding the processing of cases of alleged corruption or misuse of authority against members of the ruling PML, it is

    Investigations into the working of the Ehtesab commission and the interior ministry which are directly concerned with the accountability process under a statute, show that neither of them has been processing the references against PML leaders. According to sources, the two agencies have even been told to lay off certain cases.

    The sources claimed that some of the top PML leaders against whom
    references had been pending were Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, Sindh Chief Minister Liaquat Jatoi, Punjab Assembly speaker Pervez Elahi, former chief minister of the NWFP Pir Syed Sabir Shah, former Balochistan chief minister Zulfiqar Magsi, and former Punjab minister Raja Ishfaq Sarwar.

    Besides, a case against the NA deputy speaker, Jaffar Iqbal, was referred by an advocate from Multan to the Ehtesab Commissioner. But the commission has denied having received any formal reference in this regard.

    A commission source, however, told this correspondent that the reference had actually been sent to the commission and it had been redirected to the provincial anti-corruption department for verification of the allegations.

    The Ehtesab Commission has so far referred a total of 54 cases to special benches of the high courts for trial. These include only two references against the PML leaders Chaudhry Sher Ali (MNA) and Jam Mashooq Ali
    (MNA). But both had been sent to the high courts much before the present government came to power.

    It is learnt that the agencies concerned have been told to keep a low profile in some cases involving bureaucrats and other top officials. The case of Raana Sheikh, former MD, PTV, for instance, has been pending with the interior division but they have been asked not to send it to the Ehtesab Commission, interior ministry sources told dawn.

    Later, the Accountability Cell of the PM s Secretariat suspended all these officers except the two Ahmad Riaz Shiekh and Chaudhry Sharif. The FIA administration, the sources said, wanted to move against these two officials but they had not only been saved but the authorities had also been asked to process the case of promotion of one of them.

    According to one source, these officers have set the condition that they will only go to FIA if the incumbent director general is removed.


  • Cabinet had no idea of exile deal
    Ansar Abbasi

    16 December 2000 Issue : 06/48


    ISLAMABAD, Dec 12: The government did not consult the cabinet but
    took into confidence the military elite while granting pardon to
    Nawaz Sharif and sending the family into exile.

    A well-placed government source confided to Dawn that the dramatic
    decision had been taken purely by the men in uniform.

    The matter was discussed in the closed circles of the military
    before being put to the corps commanders at their two-day meeting
    last week.

    Asked whether the matter was placed before the cabinet, the source
    said: “No”. It was too sensitive a matter to be discussed by the
    cabinet, he added.

    The military elite’s support to the idea came when it was explained
    that the pardon and the exile was being allowed following Saudi
    Arabia’s request.

    It was said that the Saudi government had given assurance that the
    Sharifs would not take part in politics “for quite some time”.

    “Besides, the Sharifs, too, had given the undertaking in writing
    not to take part in politics,” the source said.

    Asked how Saudi Arabia would prevent any of the Sharifs to travel
    to London and issue political statements from there against the
    military regime, the source said: “If the Saudis can get the
    Sharifs freed, they can also make them behave accordingly. They
    (the Saudis) are very strict in their commitments.”

    The source, however, refused to accept that there was any Saudi
    “pressure” on the government to get the Sharifs off the hook.

    In reply to a question, the source said that those exiled to Saudi
    Arabia would remain there. “If anyone of them goes to some other
    country he would be bound to come back to the country of exile,”
    the source said.

    “We have the best example of Idi Amin who lives in Saudi Arabia
    with his 19 wives but as a completely non-political entity.”

    Persuading the government for pardon, the Saudi authorities had
    said that not only would it be an Islamic act to set Nawaz Sharif
    free after the payment of Qisas but it would also be politically
    helpful to the military regime.

    “We were told by the Saudis that they had also tried to get
    Zulfikar Ali Bhutto freed but Pakistan’s response in negative had
    plunged the country in an unending political turmoil,” the source

    He stated that the military government was expecting that the
    departure of Sharifs’ from politics would set things, particularly
    economic situation, right for the country. The government, he said,
    hoped that the present state of “shock” and “uncertainty” would not
    last long.

    “Don’t you agree with the idea of throwing the dirt out to get the
    house in order,” the source commented.


  • Another Lie and Fabrication by The News International Correspondent: Ansar Abbasi:

    Bureaucrats fear Dogar may become FPSC chief By Ansar Abbasi

    Sunday, March 22, 2009


    Gen (retd) Shahid Hamid has also seen considerable decline from the peak that this prestigious institution had seen during the days of late Lt-Gen (retd) Jamshed Gulzar Kiani.

    The Reality of General Jamshed Gulzar Kiani:

    Lt General (retired) Jamshed Gulzar Kiani [Former number 2 in ISI in 1999 and Corps Commander, and Chairman FPSC]

    Dear Sir,

    For your kind perusal,

    “What a nonsense that a retired soldier could not differentiate between chemical weapons and phosphorous grenades. The retired general in fact needs a new course to know the difference between the two,” Qureshi said. He said if Lt Gen (R) Jamshaid Gulzar Kiyani had reservations against the Kargil operation, he should have the courage to speak against the same. He never uttered a word then. He also came up with double talk on briefing the former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on the Kargil operation and asked as to why Mr Kiyani did not resign if he was true to his claim. “This gentleman availed every offer during the last eight years by remaining on key posts including corps commander and chairman Federal Public Service Commission but has now chosen the other path for some ulterior motives. He did not talk from his head but it reflected that he was speaking for someone else,” charged the presidential spokesman. [1]

    1- Kiyani’s allegations childish: Qureshi News Desk Wednesday, June 04, 2008 [1]


    The real reason behind this sudden love of Lt General Retd. Jamshed Gulzar Kiyani for Constitution, Civil Liberties, Democracy, Rule of Law, and Independent Judiciary in Pakistan is nothing but Monetary Benefits for the Ex Servicemen Society and hiding the Criminal Past of many in Servicemen Society. These men have earned Millions if not billions under the same General Musharraf whom they want to try for treason. General Jamshed never mentioned Operation Cleanup in Baluchistan [aren’t these Baluchs Pakistanis? and by mistake they also happen to be Muslims as well] particularly the Extra Judicial Killing of Sardar Akbar Bugti [if he was guilty then he should have been put on trial even in the Military Court]. General Jamshed restricted himself to Lal Mosque and Kargil [isn’t Baluchistan in Pakistan?], why? Does military training snatch the sense of history, passion, and mercy.


    The wannabe heroes By Ayesha Siddiqa

    June 13, 2008 Friday Jamadi-us-Sani 08, 1429


    So, the onlookers have to be careful in distinguishing between the need to investigate the Kargil crisis and the actual intent of people like Gen Jamsheed Gulzar Kiyani and others in telling the story now. The good general sat silent all these years enjoying his stint as head of Fauji Foundation’s company Marri Gas and then as the chairman of the Federal Public Services Commission. The question is that why didn’t he ask any question then? The retired officers defended the economic, political and social power of the armed forces and defended the organisation’s control of the state. They even mentioned the military’s right to ten per cent jobs as granted by the constitution which is an absolute fallacy. The ten per cent quota was granted by Gen Ziaul Haq and is mentioned in the Establishment code of the government and not in the constitution.


    DATELINE ISLAMABAD: Angry old men [June 15, 2008, Daily Dawn Sunday Magazine] By Anjum Niaz


    An ex-servicemen society has been launched. Alas, a watering hole has been provided for these endangered species who fear extinction unless they strut about and flap their tired old feathers trying to make waves.

    Do men have a bad hair day? The four I watched last week on television certainly appeared as having one. Getting into each other’s hair, the quartet exposed itself to being men of straw and not steel as they have always tried portraying themselves.

    Bereft of uniform and all the trappings that go with an army general, they came across churlish, even infantile. Why do retired generals get hardened and macabre? Why do their eyes turn flinty and laser hate, venom and anger? Why do they dye their hair boot-polish black? Why do they blow dry it? Why do some (Pervez Musharraf and Rashid Qureshi) wear their hair in a bouffant while Gulzar Jamshed Kiani prefers a funny mop that sits uncannily on his forehead?

    Looks aside, what’s in a name? Plenty! President Musharraf and his spokesman, hawk-eyed General (retd) Qureshi beat one point to death last week: why had Jamshed Gulzar (JG) decided to add the suffix Kiani after his name? Both said that since the real McCoy was a Kayani, as in Army Chief General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, JG of late started calling himself JGK! Imagine the ‘impudence!’ Musharraf went to the extent of saying that this chap who is now calling for Musharraf’s impeachment came from a humble background and it’s the army that gave him distinction. JG must not forget his pedestrian antecedents. Ahem… Musharraf himself comes from a similar background.

    The last general under discussion is Hamid Gul. He always looks and acts very angry. What’s his problem? Other than making umpteen TV appearances and putting himself on a pedestal, high above everyone else, what great service has this general done ever since he left the army? Sinister things happened when he was at the helm. Sketching doomsday scenario is all this one can do.

    An ex-servicemen society has been launched. Hurrah and three cheers! Alas, a watering hole has been provided for these endangered species who fear extinction unless they strut about and flap their tired old feathers trying to make waves. Leading this retired pack are retired generals Faiz Ali Chisti (whose name sent shivers down our spines during Zia days); Aslam Beg (an arrogant iconoclast) and Asad Durrani (slippery as an eel).

    These men have skeletons rattling in their cupboards and the one who has threatened to open up their cupboards to show us the skeletons is none other than Pervez Musharraf. He says it’s a long tale consuming “weeks of revelation” on these ‘unsavoury’ characters and the ‘dirty role’ they played while in service.

    The million-dollar question: who will beat whom to the finish line? Will it be this pack of angry old men who will tear away the veneer behind which the president currently squats to gloat or will it be the president who will knock each down with evidence of wrongdoing that these men may find difficult to defend? They may go back to their holes with tails between their legs?

    My educated guess is that Musharraf’s war chest against them is empty. It’s hollow. Otherwise by now spokesman Qureshi would have leaked out some dirt to his favourite hacks. Nothing has been forthcoming from the presidency. Which may mean there’s nothing to reveal.

    Remember the references Musharraf filed against Iftikhar Chaudhry? In the end all that dope that the agencies had collected and photographed on the CJP got thrown out by the 13 member bench headed by Justice Ramday (who paid for his act of defiance by being sacked). Not only that, Justice Chaudhry was reinstated and brought back as the CJP in style. One hoped Musharraf would quit after this defining defeat. But he stayed and dug a dagger in the CJP at the first chance he got on November 3, 2007. Hell hath no fury like an old man scorned.

    The CJP will not rest unless he’s restored the second time round; Pervez Musharraf will not rest unless the CJP is history; JG Kiani will not rest unless he’s given another stint as the chairman, public service commission or some other such commission; the restive retired generals will not rest unless they are sent to foreign lands as our ambassadors, or made advisers or given consultancies to keep them out of mischief.

    There’s another category of species in danger of extinction. Let’s bring them in as they gasp for breath and cling to any straw that can give them a ride through the corridors of power once again. These are men who represented us abroad. When in service, so busy were they serving the man in uniform, i.e. General Pervez Musharraf, that they had no time to deal with ordinary folks like you and me.

    Today, they have all the time to blast Musharraf because they want to remind Asif Zardari that they can still play a role should he have some slots vacant for them. Former foreign secretaries Shamshad Ahmed Khan and Riaz Khokhar are in the forefront organising a group of retired diplomats to rise up and be heard.‘Play it again, Sam’ but save us from the fury of old men scorned. They don’t make a pretty picture.