Original Articles

North Waziristan Operation – A Dawn – ISPR Exclusive Editorial

With an operation in North Waziristan inevitable, already there is an increasing talk in the media to muddle the preparations (if any) for the operation. Though other mindless newspapers and analysts take their chances by questioning  whether the operation would be fruitful or not. They point out that our internal secrutiy is very weak and any operation in North Waziristan is going to lead to a lot of attacks in the settled areas of Pakistan. Though in theory they may be correct, but what the fail to realize is that already the settled areas of Pakistan are under immense attacks. Just look at the post-OBL “saniha” scenario: Attack in Charsadda, PNS Mehran Attack, Attack on US Consulate vehicles in Peshawar, Attack on a bus in Kharian, Attack in Hangu, an attack on a border post in Dir etc. In all these attacks, nearly 200 Pakistanis have been killed.

At least in the post-OBL scenario, at least some naysayers are willing to admit that “it is our war”, they caveat the same with more attacks in Pakistan if US and Pakistan continue their war on terror efforts. An important link to all this media campaign have been the foot soldiers of Pakistan Army in our print and electronic media.

Dawn is one of the most respected newspaper of Pakistan with a history of quality and balance. Currently, Dawn’s Editor is Zaffar

Dawn's Editor - Zaffar Abbas

Abbas who is the brother of Major General Athar Abbas, the DG of ISPR. Though, however, independent each may claim to be, the fact remains ideas and influence must be shared amongst them on a regular basis. Probably that is the reason why a much angled editorial appeared in Dawn on 1st June, 2011 related to the North Waziristan operation. A seasoned commentator said after reading the editorial that DAWN’s editorial on operation in North Waziristan reads like an ISPR briefing. We wonder who wrote it and how come a serious paper allows it?” Can we dare ask Zaffar Abbas a question? Do you think if there is no operation in North Waziristan, all attacks in Pakistan will end and peace will prevail? Isn’t that the same line our ghairat brigade, Imran Khan and Jamaat-e-Islami take?

North Waziristan operation

Dawn Editorial

June 1, 2011


WILL the American and Pakistani establishments ever learn? The declaration by Adm Mike Mullen, in interviews with American news channels no less, that Pakistan is about to launch an offensive in the North Waziristan Agency is yet another example of domestic exigencies trumping common sense. With Pakistani ‘ownership’ of the war on terror under so much question and the public at large unable or unwilling to comprehend why the fight against militancy is something that is critical to the well-being of the state, it is astonishing that an American official sitting in the US would take it upon himself to announce to his domestic audience plans for a Pakistani-run military operation in Fata. If nothing else, with drone strikes and the raid to take out Osama bin Laden drawing so much criticism here for ‘violations’ of Pakistan’s sovereignty, it would have made sense for the US to allow Pakistan to announce on its own terms an impending military operation in the tribal agency.

On NWA, there has long been a consensus that a military operation of some kind is inevitable. US frustrations over the Haqqani network aside, Pakistani analysts have consistently flagged the threats that radiate from NWA into Pakistan proper. South Punjab militants, the TTP, the Gul Bahadur and Maulvi Nazir networks, members of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan and of course the Haqqani network — NWA has become a stamping ground for militants of every conceivable hue and affiliation. Denying sanctuary to militants there is therefore a necessary, though not sufficient, condition for moving forward in the fight against militancy. While the US is most concerned about the Haqqani network and Al Qaeda affiliated groups in the area, for Pakistan the problem is even more complex. Leave aside the doubts about Pakistan’s intentions for a minute. Before going into NWA, the security and intelligence apparatus will have to seriously ramp up its activities in Punjab, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and in Karachi to try and mitigate the terrorist blowback that is almost sure to follow. Right now, is the state any closer to achieving that? And if it isn’t, would cities and towns being convulsed by violence further the fight against militancy or retard it?

So, for the US the message ought to be twofold. One, stop looking like it may be bullying Pakistan into undertaking military operations on Pakistan soil — the Pakistani state needs to tell its own people first about such operations. Two, US impatience over NWA may trigger an operation prematurely, with an under-prepared state unable to handle the blowback. That cure may be worse than the sickness.

About the author

Ahmed Iqbalabadi

1 Comment

Click here to post a comment
  • DAWN Group’s double game exposed again and again but what a shameful people these are… Dawn newspaper seeks Naval chief’s resignation but why not Army Chief’s… everyone knows why?

    In a concocted letter, Dawn demanded:

    “THE attack on PNS Mehran demands corrective measures and the first step needed is the resignation or sacking of the naval chief for not having the courage to admit to the nation that it was a security lapse.

    “If the naval chief is unable to understand that he has lost the trust of the nation, then the prime minister needs to use his authority. I spent a day listening to Pakistanis here in London who are astonished that the prime minister has asked the same individual to investigate the incident whose institution failed to secure the base.

    “And lest I be accused of being unpatriotic, I am doing the opposite. I love my country and I want what is best for it. I know that the armed forces of my country have given great sacrifices in the past few years, fighting the terrorists and we have lost thousands of army and paramilitary personnel as well as policemen.

    “But sometimes such measures need to be taken for the sake of an institution and the nation. People from different countries studying here keep asking me how terrorists reached such an important navy installation. They wonder whether the terrorist had help from insiders or our armed forces are not capable of defending their own installations.

    “The demand for the resignation of the naval chief is important because it is related to holding the armed forces of the country accountable for their actions to the citizens of Pakistan and to its Constitution. If the current chief is sent home, his successor will know that he has to perform and deliver. This is a much-needed first step towards some real change. WAQAS AHMED KHAN London.”