Featured Original Articles

“Throw the Shias out of the fold of Islam!” Ansar Abbasi justifies #ShiaGenocide through his column in Jang

More than 110 Shia women, men and children were killed in Quetta on 16 Feb 2013  to "protect the honour of the Companions of the Prophet."
More than 21,000 Shia women, men and children have been killed in Pakistan by Takfiri Deobandi “Soldiers of the Companions”.”

Author: Mahpara Qalandar

In his column of 21 February 2013 published in Urdu daily Jang, Ansar Abbasi (pro-Taliban journalist) has continued his subtle justification of the Shia genocide at the hands of Takrifi Deobandi groups such as the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (aka ASWJ) and their sponsors such as the PML-N and some media houses such as the Geo-Jang group itself.

Writing his column against the background of the latest Shia carnage in Quetta in which 113 Shia men and women of every age were killed and hundreds injured by Takfiri Deobandi terrorists of Sipah-e-Sahaba (Soldiers of the Companions of Prophet aka ASWJ-LeJ), he starts in his usual style by quoting from the Quran and the Hadith by pleading for the unity of Pakistani Muslims. (Read the columns here: http://jang.com.pk/jang/feb2013-daily/21-02-2013/col16.htm)


In essence, Ansar Abbasi repeats the typical Salafist-Wahhabi Nazi-puritanical theory that sects are not allowed in Islam. In other words, all Shias, Sunni Barelvis etc should convert to Deobandi-Wahhabi sect in order to make Islam one and pure.

After urging the people to become just one group of Muslims, and not a collection of sects, Ansar Abbasi says,

(i) Allah is pleased with the Companions (Sahaba) of the Prophet (peace be upon him)

(ii) In the Koran, Allah says that He is as much happy with the Companions as they are happy with Him

(iii) According to the hadith, the Prophet (peace be upon him) said that all of his companions are like the stars in the sky. This inauthentic (Zaeef) Hadith is often quoted by LeJ-ASWJ terrorists and neo-Nazis of Islam in order to silence all historically recorded criticism of the conduct of certain Sahaba after the Prophet’s death, particularly those who physically and politically hurt the Family and descendants (Ahle Bait and Aaal) of the Prophet Muhammad.

After this, Ansar Abbasi takes out his Sipah-e-Sahaba (ASWJ-LeJ) dagger and attacks the Shias: “How can one be so consumed in sectarian hatred that one starts saying indecent words about the companions and the wives of the Prophet (peace be upon him)?”

Then he demands of the government and supports what has been previously demanded by Ahemd Ludhianvi, Malik Ishaq and pro-establishment Fake Liberals eg Ali Chishti, “The government should do legislation against those who insult the companions and the wives of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and punish them to the maximum.”


Ansar Abbasi is a liar and a hypocrite. He claims that the companions of the Prophet (peace be upon him) are sacrosanct and those who insult them should be severely punished. But he does not tell his readers who are Islamofascists like him that in the very Quran, Allah tells the Prophet (peace be upon him) that there are hypocrites around him. These are the words of Allah,

“If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while.  Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter” (33: 60-62).

“And some of the illiterates around you are hypocrites; and some of the people of Medinah; hypocrisy has become ingrained in them; you do not know them*; We know them; We shall soon punish them twice – they will then be consigned towards the terrible punishment.(Until now or as well as We do. In life and in the grave of hell.)” (9:101)

In another place, Allah says,

“Already Allah knows the hinderers among you and those [hypocrites] who say to their brothers, ‘Come to us,’ and do not go to battle, except for a few” (33: 18).

Muaviya bin Abu Sufian, a companion of the Prophet (peace be upon him) whom Ansar Abbasi and Lashkar-e-Jhangvi idealize, was the one who started the evil tradition of cursing Imam Ali, the cousin, heir, and son-in-law of the Prophet (peace be upon him) in every Friday sermon. The cursing of the Imam Ali (the fourt Rashidun Caliph) continued for hundreds of years till the Caliph Umar bin Abdul Aziz put an end to it. What Muslim will not condemn a man who started the tradition of cursing a personality about whom the Prophet said, “I am from Ali and Ali is from me!” There are countless statements by the Prophet (peace be upon him) which glorify Imam Ali.

Hazrat Abu Bakr (RA) narrates,

“The Prophet of Allah [peace be upon him] once said to me, ‘Even to look at Ali is an act of worship!’”

And this is what Allah says about the hypocrites,

“O Prophet, fear Allah and do not obey the disbelievers and the hypocrites. Indeed, Allah is ever Knowing and Wise” (33:1).

Ansar Abbasi has in a very cunning way justified the genocide of the Shias. Not a single word about the Shia genocide appears in his column. Not a word of condemnation of the genocide or Lashkar-e-Jhangvi’s crimes appears in his column. Like a true Yazidi and Jhangvi, he has blamed the victims, infants and little children included, for being Shia.

One hopes that the Muslims of Pakistan—of course excluding Takfiris like Ansar Abbasi himself—will condemn those in the media who justify the Shia genocide.

Exerpts from Caliphate and Monarchy (Khilafat-o-Mulookiat) by Syed Abul Ala Maudoodi

Maulana Maudoodi (famous Sunni scholar) reached to this conclusion AFTER years of research and reading/examining hundreds of books. Unlike self serving mullahs of today’s Pakistan who do not care about facts at all, Maulana Maudoodi did acknowledge how certain Sahaba (Companions) of the Prophet engaged in greed and mischief after the Prophet’s death and caused irreparable damage to Islam and violated the honour of the family and descendants of the Prophet.

مفتی اعظم مولانا اسحاق مدنی مدظلہ عالی کا خطاب

Related post: https://lubpak.net/archives/233379

About the author


Ali Abbas Taj is the Editor of Let Us Build Pakistan.
@aliabbastaj on Twitter


Click here to post a comment
  • His son is one of the suspects of Park line Masjid Terrorists attack. It is reported that his son went to Waziristan. To cover up he petitioned Supreme Court that his son was kidnapped by ISI. This I think also one of the reasons about him licking the feet of IC.

  • I left the following comment on Jang’s website as well but they probably won’t publish it.

    I am amazed how Jang could allow such a column to be published at this sensitive time. What is Mr. Abbasi trying to prove with the rhetoric of Sahaabah-e-Kiraam and Ummahaat-ul-momineen? Here Mr. Ansar Abbasi has subtly or even more than just subtly justified the killing of Shia Muslims, who are continuously accused of Lashkar-e-Jhangvi of the same ”crime” that they desecrate the holy personalities in Islam, wrongfully so. Why this controversial issue has to be brought on this forum, ‘The Daily Jang’ that is the most widely read paper in Pakistan and abroad with diffusion into the masses? Isn’t this column fanning the flames of sectarianism even more? I could imagine it coming from Ansar Abbasi but I didn’t expect it to be published by Jang.

  • Ansar Abbasi is the real terrorists in this country and touts of ISI…he should be punished by Govt in his evil column to spread hatred among Muslims…..He is the son of Abu sufyan and Yazeed thats why he is spreading Hate between muslims sects….he is very well know that who is the killer he is silent to condemn the killer because be belong to same sect “who only claim that they are only Muslims , remains all are Kafir” ……Stupid Ansar Abbasi…

  • I find nothing unusual in the article, are we honestly commenting on his article. He and many moderate Sunnis have this complain tha Shia majalis openly say the things which had become one of the reason to dislike and hate us. I cannot remember Hazrat Ali (A.S) ever inciting hatred or any of our Imams. What are we trying to prove, there are faults on both sides but they don’t call for killing, let’s rein our emotions and talk, if killing was a solution, than this problem would have been solved centuries ago.

  • Ridiculous article! Is it so important for a Shia to be considered a Shia that someone calling for the end of sectarianism is automatically trying to “throw Shias out of the fold of Islam”?
    Is it a basic Shia belief to de-grade Sahaba and Prophet’s wives, that someone asking an end to it automatically calling to “throw Shias out of the fold of Islam”?
    Are you so blinded by your bias against Ansar Abbasi that you can’t even see that he’s asking for BOTH sides to stop. He’s asking for legislation against people calling other sects “Kafir” also. Which you so conveniently forgot to notice.

    Ridiculously secterian minded article. Shame on you!

  • I think his column is misinterpreted. Please read his today’s column below:

    ”میں مسلمان باقی سب کافر“ کس سے منصفی چاہیں… انصار عباسی

    میں نے بڑی کوشش کی کہ قرآن پڑھ کر اپنے آپ کو سنّی ثابت کروں مگر ناکام رہا۔ میں نے سورة البقرہ، سورة آل عمران، سورة النساء، سورة المائدہ اور دوسری تمام قرآنی سورتیں پڑھیں مگر مجھے نہ کوئی شیعہ ملا، نہ بریلوی، نہ دیوبندی اور نہ ہی اہل حدیث۔ میں نے کوشش کی کہ اسوہٴ محمدﷺ کو پڑھ کر اپنے آپ کو کسی نہ کسی فرقہ سے جوڑ دوں مگر یہاں بھی مجھے ناکامی ہوئی۔ قرآن حکیم اور نبیﷺ کی زندگی کو پڑھا تو ما سوائے ایک مسلمان (مسلم) کے اپنی کوئی دوسری پہچان نہ ملی۔ کہیں کسی سنّی، کسی شیعہ، کسی بریلوی، کسی دیوبندی، کسی وہابی یا کسی دوسرے کا کوئی ذکر نہیں ملا۔ اگر فرقہ کا کہیں ذکر ہے تو رد کرنے کے انداز میں، ایک گناہ کی صورت میں، ایک تنبیہ کی حیثیت سے، ایک گمراہی کے طور پر۔ جیسے حضرت ابراہیم  ایک مسلم تھے، جیسے اللہ نے اپنے دوسرے انبیاءِ کرام علیہ اسلام کی پہچان یہی رکھی، جیسے رسول پاکﷺ کو بھی مسلمان پیدا کیا ویسے ہی اللہ نے ہمیں بھی صرف اور صرف ایک مسلم پیدا کیا اور ہم کویہی ایک واحد شناحت دی۔اللہ تعالیٰ نے بارہا قرآن میں فرمایا کہ میری اور میرے نبیﷺ کی پیروی کرو۔ حج الوداع کے موقع پر اپنے آخری خطبہ میں حضرت محمدﷺ نے فرمایا کہ آج دین مکمل ہو چکا اور یہ کہ آپﷺ پوری انسانیت کی رہنمائی کے لیے اللہ کی کتاب اور اپنی سنت چھوڑے جا رہے ہیں اور جو کوئی ان دونوں کو پکڑے رکھے گا کبھی گمراہ نہ ہو گا۔ مگر ان واضح احکامات کے باوجود ہم آج مسلمان کے علاوہ سب کچھ ہیں۔ ہم فرقوں میں اس بُرے طریقہ سے بٹ گئے کہ ہماری اصل شناخت ہی گم ہو گئی۔ ہم میں سے ہر شخص کو عام زندگی میں ان سوالات کا سامنا کرنا پڑتا ہے کہ تم کون ہو۔ اگر کوئی جواب دے کہ مسلمان ہوں تو سننے والا مطمئین نہیں ہوتا اورمزید کریدتے ہوئے پوچھتا ہے کہ سنّی ہو یا شیعہ۔ دونوں میں سے جواب کوئی بھی ہو تو مزید سوال پیدا ہوتے ہیں۔ مثلاً اگر آپ سنّی ہونے کا دعویٰ کریں تونیا سوال اُٹھتا ہے کہ حنفی ہو، شافعی ہو، مالکی ہو یا کہ حنبلی۔ اگر کسی نے بول دیا کہ وہ حنفی ہے تو پھر سوال اُٹھتا ہے کہ بھئی آپ دیوبندی یا بریلوی۔ سوالوں کا یہ سلسلہ کہیں رکنے کا نام نہیں لیتا اورہم مزید فرقوں میں بٹتے چلے جاتے ہیں۔ حال ہی میں جیو کے مزاحیہ پروگرام ”ہم سب امید سے ہیں“ میں اس بارے میں ایک خوب خاکہ پیش کیا گیا جس میں فرقوں کی بنیاد پر تقسیم در تقسیم کے اس المیہ کو پیش کیا گیا اور یہ پیغام دیا گیا کہ اگر یہ سلسلہ چلتا رہا تو ہم میں سے ہر شخص اپنے علاوہ ہر دوسرے کوکافر ہی کہنے اور سمجھنے لگے گا۔قرآن تو ہمیں اللہ کی رسی کو مضبوطی سے تھامنے اور آپس میں تفرقہ بازی سے باز رہنے کی تلقین کرتا ہے۔ قرآن تو ہمیں تنبیہ کرتا ہے ، ”اور تم اُن لوگوں جیسے ہرگز نہ ہو جانا جو مختلف ٹکڑوں میں بٹ گئے اور انہوں نے روشن نشانیاں آجانے کے بعد اختلاف کیا یہی وہ لوگ ہیں اُن کے لیے بہت بڑا عذاب ہو گا۔“ (آل عمران)۔سورة الانعام میں اللہ تعالیٰ فرماتے ہیں کہ بے شک جن لوگوں نے اپنے دین میں جدائیاں ڈال دیں اور الگ الگ گروہ بن گئے آپﷺ ان کی تو کسی بھی بات میں نہیں ہیں ان کا سارا معاملہ اب اللہ تعالیٰ کے ہاں ہے اور وہ انہیں بتا دے گا کہ وہ کیا کچھ کرتے رہے ہیں۔ اسی طرح سورة الانفال میں مسلمانوں کو ہدایت دی جاتی ہے کہ اللہ تعالیٰ اور اُس کے رسولﷺ کی فرماں برداری کیا کرو اور آپس میں جھگڑا مت کیا کرو ورنہ تمھاری ہمتیں پست اور ہوا اُکھڑ جائے گی ۔نبیﷺ کی ایک حدیث کا مفہوم ہے کہ ایک جنگلی بھیڑیا بھی اگر بکریوں کے ایک ریوڑ میں گھس جائے تو وہ اتنا نقصان نہیں پہنچاتا جتنا دین میں تفرقہ بازی پہنچاتی ہے۔ مگر ہماری ضد، انا، تکبر اور جاہلیت کا یہ عالم ہے کہ ہم تو اللہ اور اللہ کے رسولﷺ کے احکامات کے برعکس نہ صرف فرقوں میں بٹ گئے بلکہ اپنے آپ کو پکا اور سچا مسلمان ثابت کرنے کے لیے ایک دوسرے پر کفر کا فتوے لگا کر قتل تک کرنا شروع کر دیا۔ اسلام تومنافقین جن کی نشاندھی خود اللہ تعالیٰ نے نبیﷺ کے لیے کی اور جو اسلام کے بدترین دشمن تھے کو بھی قتل کرنے کا حکم نہیں دیا۔ محمدﷺ نے تو منافق اعظم عبداللہ بن اُبی کو بھی ایک موقع پر اُس کے صحابی بیٹے کے ہاتھوں قتل ہونے سے بچایا۔مگر ہم ہیں کہ فرقوں میں بٹ کر ایک دوسرے کے خلاف نفرت اس حد تک بڑھا دی کہ دین کی اصل تعلیمات کو ہی پس پشت ڈال دیا۔ کیا ہم اللہ کی اس بات کو بھول چکے کہ ایک انسان کا قتل پوری انسانیت کا قتل ہے۔ کیا آج ایک مسلمان کا خون اس قدر بے توقیر ہو گیا کہ ہمیں یہ بھی یاد نہ رہا کہ پیغمبر اسلامﷺ نے ایک کلمہ گو کی جان اور مال کی حرمت کو کعبہ کی حرمت پر فوقیت دی۔ ہم تو نبیﷺ کی اس حدیث کو بھی بھول گئے جس میں آپﷺ نے اپنے صحابہ کو ستاروں کی مانند کہا جن سے ہمیں رہنمائی حاصل کرنا ہے۔ قرآن پاک میں خلفاءِ راشدین اور صحابہ کرام کی عزت اور مرتبہ کے بارے میں اللہ تعالیٰ فرماتے ہیں کہ میں اُن سے راضی ہوا اور وہ مجھ سے۔ اسی طرح آپﷺ کی ازواجِ مطہرات کو امہات المومنین کہا گیا اور جن کی عزت و تکریم ہر مسلمان پر لازم ہے۔ فرقہ واریت کی آگ میں کوئی اتنا کیسے بھڑک سکتا ہے کہ صحابہ کرام اور امہات المومنین کے بارے میں کوئی نازیبا بات کر جائے۔ یہ حکومت کی بنیادی ذمہ داری ہے کہ وہ عوام کو قرآن اور حدیث پڑھائیں تا کہ ہم سب اپنی اصل پہچان(مسلمان) کو پا لیں اور فرقہ واریت کی آگ سے جان چھڑا سکیں۔ اس کے ساتھ ساتھ یہ بھی ریاست کی ذمہ داری ہے کہ قانون سازی کر کے ایسے افراد کو سخت سے سخت سزا دی جائے جو صحابہ کرام اور امہات المومنینکی شان میں گستاخی کرتے ہیں یا فرقہ واریت کی بنیاد پر ایک دوسرے کو کافر ہونے کا فتویٰ دیتے ہیں۔ اگر ریاست نے اپنی ذمہ داری پوری نہ کی تویہ قتل و غارت نہیں رُکے گی بلکہ ہم اُس مقام پر پہنچ جائیں گے جہاں ہر کوئی اپنے سوا سب کو دائرہ اسلام سے خارج سمجھے گا۔

  • this article is a classic example of taking a clip out of any video or few sentences from the whole essay and then moulding it the way we like it to be sounded, what Mr. Ansar Abbasi is trying to say is his personal point of view but hatred, abomination or a contempt is never a basic principle of any religion whether it be Shiasm or Sunnism, it is because of our mullahs and allamas who in order to get their product attractive and sellable have included self glorification for themselves and hatred against others.

  • Why do some people refuse to see that Ansar Abbasi – the intellectual face of Salafists, did not condemn the killing of Hazara Shia Muslims openly. Rather he vaguely mentioned killing of Muslims in general. And right after that he started the rhetoric about the companions and the wives etc. So what does that prove. While everyone knows that Shia Muslims have been wrongly accused of insulting the companions and wives of the holy prophet, by the Lashakar-eJhangvi and its kinds in order to justify the Shia killing. So, what Ansar Abbasi has done is subtly justifying the killing of Shia Muslims or implying that their killing, although condemnable, occurs due to the reason that they insult the companions and the wives. Now, I say, even if Shia Muslims do so what is wrong in it? Although it is not part of the Shia belief at all to attribute lies to the companions of the holy prophet and his wives. According to Shia jurisprudents it is Haraam for Shia Muslims to accuse prophets’ wives falsely of any sin, not only the wives of the holy prophet but wives of all the prophets. And also, it is haraam to attribute lies to the companions of the holy prophet. In short, it is NOT part of the Shia belief to insult any specific persons in the Islamic history if they have not committed any crime against the holy prophet and his family. But Ansar Abbasi and his kinds have a certain mindset – a filthy mindset – a sick midset – a perverse mindset – a mindset that can only incite hatred.

  • Ye Kinzir Ki Aulad Hay. Ansar Dalla ISI Ka Maal Khatta Hai. Is Ka Baita LeJ ka terrorist hay.

  • Fatwa #3:
    Ansar Abbasi has abused his forefather, Ibne Ubai. He is hereby outcast-ed from Deen as Kafir-Awaal.

  • I am no religious scholar, but as an ordinary Muslim I have always found it logical that the decision as to eiman (faith) or kufr (negation of faith) of human beings belongs solely to Allah the Omniscient or to those He finds capable of taking such decision – usually His representatives, and most certainly not every Tom, Dick and Harry who knows a thing or two about religion.
    I have seen the fatwa (religious decree) of February 1986 by many Ulama-e-Deoband of Pakistan (including Samiul Haq’s father Abdul Haq, then a sitting senator, Nurududdin Shamzai and Yusuf Ludhianvi, both very eminent Deobandi religious scholars, and about 50 others) that apostatizes Shias and declares them ‘wajib-ul-qatl’ (subject to mandatory killing). The Anjuman-e-Sipah-e-Sahaba (ASS) and its gorier face, the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ) were born as a result of this fatwa, as did the still continuing three decade old episode of Shia Genocide in Pakistan.

    One had hoped that this gift of General Zia Nahaq shall gradually die, and “enlightened moderation”, to which his successor usurper paid a lot of lip service, shall replace it, at least among the intelligentsia if not the clergy. So, while on the one hand, while one is encouraged by the views of Maulana Ishaq Madani (Ahle-Hadith) and recent statement of Javed Ghamidi (ex-Jamaat-e-Islami), as also the officially expressed views of most religious parties, more so the Barelvis, that declare Shias to be Muslims, on the other hand one was discouraged to read a piece in an high circulation newspaper by Mr. Ansar Abbasi that almost parrots the ASS/LeJ position. Mr. Abbasi is not a lone wolf – his pack of backers is easily identifiable. This may, thus, be a feeler – if not the foundation – for enactment of the Hurmat-e-Sahaba bill introduced by the ASS terrorist Azam Tariq in the assembly – a piece of legislation that effectively apostatizes Shia Muslims.

    Now let us go back to the 1986 Deobandi fatwa. It stated three ‘bases’ for takfeer (apostatization) of Shias:

    1. That they believe in divinity of Hazrat Ali a.s. and the Imams a.s in his progeny, and thus at a higher status than the Holy Prophet (sawas)
    2. That they believe the Quraan in its present form as having been tampered with and incomplete.
    3. That they abuse sahaba (ra) (companions of the Holy Prophet (sawas)) and Ummuhaat al-Momineen (ra) (wives of the Holy Prophet (sawas))
    Let us take a look at each of these ‘bases’:
    The Ali a.s that Shia Muslims believe in prided in calling himself “a slave among the slaves of Muhammad (sawas)’. He was martyred while prostrating to Allah, as was his son and the third Imam Husain a.s. Can we logically believe a follower of the Holy prophet (sawas) at a higher status than him? Is it logical that one prostrating to Allah is himself a divine being? Do divine beings face martyrdom as our Imams a.s. did?
    Go to any Shia household, seminary or mosque anywhere in the world and pick up a copy of the Quraan there. Compare it with the ‘authentic’ Quraan. You will find not an iota of difference. In fact, the belief that quraan can be tampered with is itself a blasphemy against the Divine Guarantee that, “It is We that revealed the Quraan, and it is We that shall keep it safe.” Shia religious scholars right from Sheikh Saduq (d. 991) to Syed Muhammad Husain Tabatabai (d. 1981) and Syed Abul Qasim Khu’I (d. 1992) have written detailed commentaries confirming what I have submitted.

    These two purported ‘bases’ of takfeer are so absurd that they are no longer repeated as `reasons for apostatization of Shias. The third ‘basis’ – which Mr. Ansar Abbasi has reintroduced in the vernacular press – is trickier.
    It is a matter of record that senior most Shia scholars of today, Sayyed Ali Khamene’i (HA) and Sayyed Ali Sistani (HA) have issued decrees prohibiting (declaring ‘haraam’) abuse of those held in esteem by Sunni Muslims. Any Shia abusing any Ummul Momineen (ra) or Sahabi (ra) shall, therefore, be violating this decree and committing a forbidden act.
    Having said that, I would submit the following:
    1. While such abuse is a vile act, using it as a basis for takfeer has no basis in Quraan or Sunnah.
    2. Not all who professed to have converted to Islam at the hands of the Holy Prophet (sawas) actually did so. That is clear by the presence of Sura al-Munafiqun (The Hypocrites) in the Quraan. So, it is logical that not all who apparently accepted Islam actually did so and were, therefore, at the level of being sahaba (ra).
    3. What about those personalities who abused eminent sahaba? For instance, history records that Muavia initiated the practice of abusing Ali a.s. from Umayyad pulpits. Ummul Momineen Aisha (ra) has been quoted as saying: ”Uqtul al-Naasal” (Kill that old jew) in respect of Caliph Usman (ra). In their eagerness to apostatize Shia Muslims, are the Ulama-e-Deoband – amd now Mr. Abbasi – not using the same sword for these two?
    4. What about those who were responsible for killing of sahaba (ra)? More serious than abuse, perhaps? During the caliphate of Hazrat Abu Bakr (ra) a posse under his military commander killed the sahabi Malik ibne Nuwaira (ra) and Khalid raped his widow. During the reign of Hazrat Usman (ra), the sahabi Abdullah ibne Masoud (ra) was beaten so severely by government functionaries that he died of his wounds. During the same period, Hazrat Abuzar (ra) was exiled to the desert on the bare back of a camel – an act that resulted in his death. And then the uprisings against the caliphate of Hazrat Ali a.s. in the form of Jamal (led by Ummul Momineen Aisha (ra) and Talha and Zubayr) and Siffin (led by Muavia, along with Marwan al-Hakam and Amr ibne Aas). Thousands of sahaba (ra) – including Hazrat Ammar ibne Yasir (ra) – lost their lives in these uprisings. What about those responsible for their being killed? And then what about those responsible for martyring the sahabi and Imam Husain ibne Ali a.s. at Karbala? Persons like Zakir Naik are on record as having sought Allah’s pleasure for the one responsible for the martyrdom of Husain (a.s.). Would the Deobandi decree also cover this friend of theirs?
    In summary, my submission is simple: let us not commit the possible blasphemy of deciding on issues that fall exclusively under Divine Authority – or authority of those to whom He delegated it – but certainly not within our authority. In the process, we are also guilty of opening a can of worms that will apostatize those whose sanctity we are ostensibly trying to protect!

  • The context in which that journalist has criticized Shias is obviously ill-intentioned. He has by implication accused the entire community of Shaba and Hazrat Aisha (RA) bashing — by faking a context against communalism. This is what Takfiri-Nasibi say to justify Shia killing. He is using the platform of Jang to fuel the fire in these dangerous times. ISI is using its touts in the media to hasten Shia cleansing — an agenda given by the evil empire of Saudi Arabia.

    In his past articles he has many times praised Mullah Omar and Al-Qaeda. Any person in doubt should read his past article, available in the Jang archives.

    Moreover, I recommend Abbasi sympathizers to read Maulana Maudidi’s Khlifat-O-Mallokiat to build a correct picture on who were the people in early Islamic history who kicked-off abusive campaign against Sahaba. To somebody really interested in history, I would recommend ‘Fitna-tul-Kubra’ by late Egyptian writer Taha Hussein. An Urdu version of his book is available, though it is somewhat weird. Taha Hussein was not a Shia. He was expelled from Azhar becuase of his very liberal views.

  • I think Mrs. Mahpara didn’t noticed the first Line of the Paragraph mentioned by her in which Ansar said “Life of Muslim more sacred than Kaaba”, Hats off to you mahpara. Hypocrate

  • plz dont spread hatred. First read his column and then give some statement. he just said abusing any relative and wives of Prophit Mohammad (PBUH) is not allowed and the people who do this are not good muslim. He never said that it gives some one right to kill some one .Shame on those who spread hatred ,, plz stop this propaganda… fear ALLAH,, Dont act like blind and duffer stupids.. islam is true religion so be open and read Quraan to know the clear and right path.

  • This article by Mahpara only proves that the so-called liberal bastards in Pakistan like her are bent upon spreading sectarian hatred in the country. I am a shia and I find nothing wrong in the article by Ansar Abbasi. But these bastards who feed on US dollars through their international donor funded NGOs leave no stone unturned to malign Pakistan and the people who love Islam. Shame on you Mahpara, daughter of a bitch!!

  • You are dung beetle Deobandi. Your Dadi Hinda slept with Ibne Ubai and you father Muavia was born. Shut up you SOB barking against LUBPIans. Kutta ka bachha.

  • A dung beetle enemy has been spotted. Active since a couple of days, exhibiting Deobandi religious morality. Send his recorded IP address to the usual locations. May Allah Be With You. Allah-o-Akbar!

  • Tracked! This is Abbasi himself commenting with different fake names against LUBP. Wonderful catch by field unit. He is licking his wounds.

  • Bus maaf karene kaafi bake ho zayada bakne ki zarurat nahi, hamare laye tamam sahaba (ra) qable qader hen awer aun ka apna apna makam he ager kesi ne sahaba karam ki shan me gusthakhi ki tho muslaman keya wo to insan kehlane k qabil nahi aus ko insan kehna insaniath ki thoheen he ager woh suni he ya shia ya koyee awer me laanath bejtha hun auspe a eman walo thum be laanet bejo aus pe

  • It is sad that so called muslim “scholars’did not do enough research on the matter. They must organise enough findings on reasearch and then comment