Original Articles

A critical article on Aal-e-Saud and Wahhabis – by Aamir Mughal


‘A picture speaks a thousand words’: Sons of late King Faisal [great great great maternal grandson of mutawwa Sheikh Mohammad Bin Abd Al Wahab] Turki Al Faisal and Saud Al Faisal with neo-con ex-US Vice President Dick Cheney

Sheikh Mohammad Bin Abd Al Wahab must be turning in his grave [of course unplastered, bulldozed grave] at the hypocrisy of the Aal-e-Saud, and their persistent subservience to the USA.

I am not ashamed at all for using any kind of derogatory language for the shameless rulers of the Saudi Empire. To follow tawheed [monotheism] and oppose polythesim [shirk], Quran and hadith are enough; no where it is written that we have to follow the Laat, Manat, Uzza and Hubal [Aal-e-Saud, Arabs and Wahabi muttawwas] of present days. They are responsible for the present bloodletting in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iraq [particularly in the FATA region of Pakistan].

Excerpts from a book: Pakistan’s Drift into Extremism: Allah, the Army and America’s War on Terror By Hassan Abbas published by An East Gate Book. M.E. Sharpe Armonk, New York, London England.

“The Khomeini revolution in Iran already bolstered the confidence of the Shias, and they were not about to take Sunni dictates in religious matters lying down. Hard-liners among Sunni, for their part, felt that such dictation was their right, and those on the extreme right of the Sunni spectrum simply cut the Gordian knot by taking a position that, correct or not, Pakistan had a Sunni majority and as such it should be declared a Sunni Muslim state in which Shia should be treated as a minority. Since achievement of this holy goal would likely to take some time, some of them decided that the interregnum ought not to be wasted. Thus in 1985 they formed Anjuman Sipah-e-Sahaba (ASS) – an organization piously dedicated to ridding the country of the nettlesome presence of the Shias by eliminating them physically. Later, when they realized what the organization’s acronym meant in English, they changed the name to Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan (SSP).”

“The zealous emissaries of the Iranian Revolutionary Regime started financing their organization Tehreek-e-Nifza-e-Fiqah-e-Jafaria (TNFJ – Movement for the Implementation of Jafaria Religious Law) and providing scholarships for Pakistani student to study in Iranian religious seminaries. For the Zia regime though, the problematic issue was Shia activism leading to a strong reaction to his attempts to impose Hanafi Islam (a branch of Sunni sect). For this he winked to the hard-liners among the Sunni religious groups in order to establish a front to squeeze the Shias. It was in this context that Jhangvi was selected by the intelligence community to do the needful. It is also believed that the JUI recommendation played the decisive part in this choice. The adherents of the Deobandi School were worried about Shia activism for religious reasons anyhow. State patronage came as an additional incentive. Consequently, in a well-designed effort, Shia assertiveness was projected as their disloyalty to Pakistan and its Islamic Ideology.”

“In a few months, Saudi funds started pouring in, making the project feasible. For Saudi Arabia, the Iranian revolution was quite scary, for its ideals conflicted with that of a Wahabi monarchy. More so, with an approximately 10% Shia population, Saudi Arabia was concerned about the expansion of Shia activism in any Muslim country. Hence, it was more than willing to curb such trends in Pakistan by making a financial investment to bolster its Wahabi Agenda. According to Vali Raza Nasr, a leading expert on the sectarian groups of Pakistan, the flow of these funds was primarily routed through the Pakistan Military and the ISI. It is not known whether American support for this scheme was readily available, but the Zia regime knew well that the United States would be glad to acquiesce, given the rising US – Iran hostility. However, some analyst believe that CIA funds were involved in the venture.”

How shameless are these citizens of oil rich Arab Sates [UAE, KUWAIT, QATAR, SAUDI ARABIA, OMAN, BAHRAIN], while their own countires ‘enjoy’ a dark record of human rights abuses [Reference: “The Island of Happiness” MAY 19, 2009 http://www.hrw.org/en/node/83110/section/5] yet they HAVE the courage talk about the Quran and Sunnah.

To me these hypocrites are worst creatures on earth. Let me quote an personal encounter with one of such hypocrites:

A Saudi national [Naval Officer] while in Karachi asked me to help him buy a car. I asked him: “would you trust a Bakistani”? To which he said, “yes! yes! why not you are a Muslim”, to which I asked about the treatment “so-called alleged Pakistan/Indian/Bengali Muslim brothers [even if one is not Muslim these rascals have no right to insult anybody] received from Arabs hands everywhere in the Middle East particularly at the airports. I don’t like racism and prejudice; unfortunately many Arabs (not unlike Turks and Persians) are racist in literal sense [muta’asib] to the extent of ghulu. One must just watch them the way they mistreatreat Pakistanis, Indians and Bengalis at their airports and ….

You can read Aamir Mughal’s full article at the following link:

http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com

About the author

Abdul Nishapuri

12 Comments

Click here to post a comment
  • Saleem Safi’s article on a jihadi hypocrite:

    یہ کہاں کاانصاف ہے؟…جرگہ…سلیم صافی

    وہ جو ہم جیسے گناہگار ہیں، دین کا علم جانتے ہیں اور نہ عمل کے میدان میں آگے ہیں، جو صرف اور صرف اللہ کی رحمت اور نبی رحمت صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم کی شفاعت کے سہارے بخشش کے طلب گار ہیں، ہم جیسے وہ گناہگار لوگ بھی پیغمبر اسلام کی ذات اور دینی شعائر کو مکروہ عزائم کے لئے استعمال کرنے کا سوچتے ہوئے کانپ اٹھتے ہیں لیکن نہ جانے کیوں دین کے بعض نام لیوا اس قبیح فعل کے تسلسل کے ساتھ مرتکب ہوتے رہتے ہیں۔ نام رحمت للعالمین کا استعمال کرتے ہیں لیکن کام وہ کرجاتے ہیں جو آپ کی تعلیمات سے یکسر منافی ہو۔قبیلے کے سرخیل کا اعزاز ان دنوں محمد عطاء اللہ” صدیقی “کو حاصل ہورہا ہے ۔
    بھائی آپ کواگر جنگ جیسے اخبار میں نام چھپوانے کا شوق ہے تو کئی اور طریقے ہوسکتے ہیں۔ اس کے لئے آخر پیغمبر اسلام کے مقدس نام کو استعمال کرنے ، جھوٹ لکھنے ، چھپے ہوئے الفاظ کو غلط معنی پہنانے اور دنیا کی نظروں میں ہم جیسے مسلمانوں کے عقیدے سے متعلق ابہام پیدا کرنے کی کیا ضرورت ہے ؟ قارئین میرا کالم اٹھا کر دیکھ سکتے ہیں ، اس میں کہیں فیس بک یا یوٹیوب کا ذکریا حوالہ ہو تو میں گناہگار ۔ اگر کہیں یہ لکھا ہو کہ ہمیں نعوذباللہ پیغمبر اسلام کی توہین پر مشتعل نہیں ہونا چاہئے تومیں مجرم۔ بات فقط یہ تھی صوفی دانشور احمد جاوید صاحب کی اسلامی نظریاتی کونسل کے ایک ہال میں گفتگو کو بنیاد بناتے ہوئے میں نے اس کالم میں یہ واضح کرنے کی کوشش کی تھی کہ قرآن و سنت کی تعلیمات کا منافی عمل بھی ان ہستیوں کی توہین کے زمرے میں آتا ہے ۔ ہم پاکستانی افسوسناک حد تک اس کے مرتکب ہورہے ہیں اور ہمیں احتجاج کے ساتھ ساتھ اس جانب بھی متوجہ ہوکرہمیں اپنے آپ کو حضور کا اچھا اور سچا امتی بنانے کی کوشش کرنی چاہئے لیکن عطاء اللہ ” صدیقی“ نے اپنے کالم میں ایسا تاثر دیا ہے کہ جیسے نعوذ بااللہ میں پیغمبر اسلام کی توہین پر احتجاج کا مخالف ہوں یا مجھے فیس بک اور انٹرنیٹ کی بندش نے پریشان کررکھا تھا۔
    اللہ کی لعنت ہو اس فرد پر جو حضرت محمد کی شان میں کسی بدبخت کی گستاخی پر مضطرب نہ ہو۔ لعنت ہو اس مسلمان پر جو اس عظیم ہستی کی شان اقدس میں گستاخی کے تصور پر تڑپ نہ اٹھے لیکن کیا پیغمبر ﷺ سے محبت کا یہ بھی تقاضا ہے کہ اس کی آڑ میں راسخ العقیدہ مسلمانوں کے دین و ایمان کو مشکوک بنا دیا جائے ؟ کیا اس ہستیﷺ نے مسلمانوں کے خلاف فتویٰ بازی سے منع نہیں فرمایا ہے ؟پیغمبر اسلامﷺ اور صحابہ کرام کی شان میں گستانی کا تصور کفر عظیم ہے لیکن کیا اس کے امتیوں کو ذاتی اور سیاسی مقاصد کے لئے ان کے گستاخوں کی صف میں شامل کرنا ظلم عظیم نہیں؟ اس بندے کا مقام کیا حضورنے جہنم نہیں ٹھہرایا ہے جو راسخ العقیدہ مسلمانوں کے دین و ایمان کے بارے میں شکوک پیدا کرتا ہے ؟
    اللہ تعالیٰ کا لاکھ لاکھ شکر ہے کہ میں نے اپنی زندگی کے جس پہلے احتجاجی جلوس میں شرکت کی ، وہ ملعون سلمان رشدی کے خلاف جلوس تھا۔میرا جب میٹرک کا نتیجہ آرہا تھا تو میں پیغمبرﷺ اور دین اسلام پر غیرت کے جذبے کے تحت افغانستان کے صوبہ کونڑ میں جنگ میں مصروف تھا اور میرے ساتھ جانے والے گواہ آج بھی زندہ ہیں۔ عطاء اللہ ”صدیقی“ یا ان جیسا کوئی اور ہمارا ناقد اگر واقعی دین اور پیغمبرﷺ کے نام پر غیرت کا مظاہرہ کرنا چاہتے ہیں تو میری خدمات حاضر ہیں ۔ میں تمام قارئین کو گواہ بنا کر پیشکش کرتا ہوں کہ عطاء اللہ کوافغانستان لے جانا ، انہیں امریکہ اور ڈنمارک کی فوجیوں کے خلاف جہاد میں مصروف طالبان یا حزب اسلامی کے لوگوں سے ملوانا اور امریکیوں یا ڈنمارک کے فوجیوں کے کیمپ تک پہنچانا میری ذمہ داری ہے، آئیے بسم اللہ کیجئے ۔
    عطاء اللہ ”صدیقی“ صاحب اور ان جیسے دیگر لوگ معصوم اور جذباتی پاکستانیوں کے جذبات سے کھیلنے کی بجائے خود میدان میں آئیں۔ وہ ائیرکنڈیشنڈ کمروں میں بیٹھ کر اللہ اور رسولﷺ کے شیدائی پاکستانیوں کے جذبات سے کھیلتے ہیں۔ یہ لوگ تو صرف دکانداری چمکانے یا حسد کی آگ بجھانے کے لئے اس طرح کی تحریریں لکھ دیتے ہیں لیکن پاکستان کے سادہ لوح اور مخلص مسلمان نوجوان اسی طرح ہی کی تحریروں کو پڑھ کر اپنے جسموں سے بم باندھتے ہیں۔ میں ان لوگوں کی طرح ایئرکنڈیشنڈ کمروں میں بیٹھ کر لوگوں کے جذبات کو نہیں بھڑکا رہا۔ دور طالب علمی میں ایک عرصہ ان لوگوں کے ساتھ افغانستان میں گزارا ہے ۔ اب بھی ہمہ وقت ان سے رابطے کی کوشش کرتا رہتا ہوں۔ یہ جو جسموں سے بم باندھ کر کبھی اسکول ، کبھی پولیس چیک پوسٹ اور کبھی مولانا حسن جان یا مولانا نعیمی جیسے علماء کو نشانہ بناتے ہیں ، ان کی اکثریت مخلص مسلمانوں کی ہے ۔ یہ عطاء اللہ ”صدیقی“ جیسے صرف گفتار کے نہیں بلکہ کردار کے بھی غازی ہیں ۔ وہ پہلے روس سے لڑتے تھے ۔ اب جارح امریکہ سے لڑ رہے ہیں لیکن عطاء اللہ ”صدیقی“ جیسے لوگوں کی تحریروں اور تقریروں نے ان کا رخ پاکستانیوں کی طرف موڑ دیا ہے ۔ جب یہ لوگ اپنی دکانداری کے لئے کسی سیاستدان، کسی صحافی یا کسی عالم کے بارے میں اپنی تحریروں اور تقریروں سے یہ تاثر عام کردیتے ہیں کہ وہ امریکہ کا ایجنٹ ہے ، فوج کا ایجنٹ ہے یا پھر نعوذ باللہ توہین رسالت سے تڑپ نہیں اٹھتے ہیں ، تو وہ مخلص اور سادہ لوح مجاہد اپنے جسموں سے بم باندھ کر ان پاکستانیوں کا خاتمہ کرنے لگ جاتے ہیں۔ میں درجنوں فدائین اور مجاہدین سے ملا ہوں۔ جب ان کے سامنے یہ سوال اٹھاتا ہوں کہ انہوں نے فلاں مسلمان پاکستانی کو کیوں مارنے کا حکم صادر کیا یا کیوں مارنا چاہتے ہیں تو ان کی گفتگو سے یہ نتیجہ سامنے آتا ہے کہ وہ اپنی دانست میں پورے اخلاص کے ساتھ اس پاکستانی مسلمان کو واجب القتل سمجھ رہے ہوتے ہیں اور جب آپ ان کے ساتھ مکالمہ کریں تو وہ دلیل کے طور پر عطاء اللہ” صدیقی“ جیسوں کی تحریریں اور تقریریں پیش کرتے ہیں ۔اسی طرح کی تقریروں اور تحریروں کو انہوں نے اپنے لٹریچر اور پروپیگنڈا سی ڈیز کا حصہ بنا رکھا ہے اور جب سادہ لوح اور عملی مسلمان نوجوان ان کو پڑھتے اور سنتے ہیں تو ان کا خون کھول اٹھتا ہے اور وہ اپنے ہم کلمہ پاکستانیوں کو واجب القتل جان کر ان کے خلاف میدان میں نکل آتے ہیں ۔ افغانستان یا قبائلی علاقوں میں جانے کی ہمت توشاید وہ یا ان کی قبیل کے دیگر لوگ کرسکیں لیکن وہ لاہور اور دیگر شہروں میں گرفتار فدائین سے جاکر مل لیں ۔ ان پر واضح ہوجائے گا کہ ایسے ہی کالموں اور تقریروں سے متاثر ہوکر وہ اس میدان میں اترتے ہیں۔ اسی لئے تو میں کہتا ہوں کہ خودکش حملہ آوروں کے عمل کا اسلام اور پاکستان کو شدید نقصان تو پہنچ رہا ہے لیکن افسوس کہ وہ یہ کام بری نیت سے نہیں بلکہ جنت کی آرزو میں کئے جارہے ہیں ۔ تبھی تو میں اختلاف کے باوجود ان لوگوں کو عظیم سمجھتا ہوں ۔ تبھی تو میں عرض کرتا ہوں کہ یہ لوگ ہماری سوسائٹی کے کریم تھے جو ضائع ہورہے ہیں اور تبھی تو میں کہتا ہوں کہ اصل قصوروار خودکش حملہ آور نہیں بلکہ عطاء اللہ ”صدیقی“ جیسے لوگ ہیں جو انہیں امریکہ اور اسلام دشمنوں کے مقابلے کا صحیح طریقہ سمجھانے کے بجائے محض اپنی دکانداری کی خاطر ان کے جذبات سے کھیلتے رہتے ہیں ۔ آخر یہ کہاں کا انصاف ہے کہ خود تو ایک کالم لکھنے یا پھر ایک تقریر جھاڑنے سے اپنے آپ کو بری الذمہ قرار دیتے ہولیکن دوسروں کے بچوں کو خودکش حملہ آور بننے پر اکساتے ہو اور وہ بھی امریکہ یا کسی غیرمسلم گستاخ کے خلاف نہیں بلکہ اپنے مسلمان پاکستانیوں کے خلاف ۔
    الحمد للہ میں تو کل جس راستے کو پیغمبر اسلام ﷺ کے نام اور دین پر غیرت کا تقاضا سمجھتا تھا ، اس پر عمل کیا اور آج جس کو درست سمجھتا ہوں یا جس کی دوسروں کو تلقین کررہا ہوں، اس پر خود عمل پیرا ہوں۔ آپ اگر احتجاج اور خودکش حملوں کے راستے کو ہی درست سمجھتے ہیں تو آئیے ۔ بسم اللہ کیجئے ۔ افغانستان بھی حاضر ہے اور پاکستان کے اندر کی تربیت گاہیں بھی لیکن یہ تو کوئی بات نہ ہوئی کہ خود ایئرکنڈیشنڈکمروں کے مزے لوٹیں اور دوسروں کے بچوں کو احتجاج اور خودکش حملوں کی تلقین کریں ۔ خود تو اپنے بچوں کو ماں کی گود میں کمپیوٹر اور انٹرنیٹ سے آشنا کرتے ہوئے انگریزی میڈیم اسکولوں میں پڑھائیں اور میرے بچوں کو خودکش حملہ آور بننے کی تلقین کریں۔یہ کہاں کا انصاف ہے ؟

    Source: Jang, 15 June 2010

  • The Saudi fascism or Wahabiism has been the chief supporter of the Taliban clans. With their literature on Jihad and suicide bombing, they have made havoc all around. Wahabi’s are bigote din their speech and act.

  • Saud took over Makah and Medina and declared it as Saudi Arabia, perhaps the only state named after a person. The extreme views of these people are purposely forced on Pakistanis and of course Zia played a major role in it.

  • @Zulfiqar Haider
    Another evidence of hypocrite and visionless Islamists, they call for freedom of “Qibla-e-Awal” from the occupation of Israelis but shouldn’t they first put their house in order? As holy lands of Mecca & Medina are not only occupied by the Suadis but have been renamed. The historical name of “Hejaz” has been changed to a personal fiefdom of the family of Saud.
    The Deoband Ulema claim it loud and bold, on their flags and banners “al arz o lillah” “All Land belongs to Allah Almighty!!”
    Have they ever bothered to look upon their political and financial benefactors? Or they must amend their slogan “Land Belongs to Allah Almighty…Except Arabia which belongs to Saudis”
    Will the religious activists raising slogans for Palestine care to take stock of this desecration? Nobody from the ranks of any vocal Palestine supporters ever raise their voice on the excesses committed in this (occupied) land by the family of Saud. Neither the Shiite nor the Sunni zealots, self proclaimed devotees of Holy Prophet (PBUH), who throng the roads on non issues of banning facebook…have they ever bothered to think of what these Saudis are doing? Their sentiments are not stirred? or the sanctity of Islam or the symbols attached to it can only be vandalized by the non muslims, if muslims (read deobandi/Wahabi/ audi as all the rest are believed to be non-Muslims) do this it is acceptable.

  • aley : @Zulfiqar Haider Another evidence of hypocrite and visionless Islamists, they call for freedom of “Qibla-e-Awal” from the occupation of Israelis but shouldn’t they first put their house in order? The Deoband Ulema claim it loud and bold, on their flags and banners “al arz o lillah” “All Land belongs to Allah Almighty!!”

    I wouldn’t have Deobandi Anarchist Mawlvis [rabidly sectarian/takfiri in nature] and to condemn Aal-e-Saud, Arabs and Saudi Muatwwas! That’s why I rely on Saudi Policies and their double standards. If we quote Deobandis then Deobandis also say this and nobody [who is a sane] would believe this:

    Don’t rely on Deoband, read Gems of Wisdom from Deoband.

    Read this “DEOBANDI KUFR [DISBELIEF] ” and you will certainly Laugh: “One person asked Khidr that,”Have you ever seen any wali who is better than you?” Khidr replied, “Yes, I have. I once visited the mosque of the Prophet. I saw Imaam Abdur Razzaq Muhaddith and he was teaching ahadith. The crowd and I listened to the ahadith from him. In one corner… See More of the masjid there was a youngster sitting who had kept his head between his knees away from the crowd. I said, Do you not see that ahadith of the Prophet are being taught? Why don’t you also attend the circle? He neither lifted his head nor did he look at me and said, “In that place are those who listen to ahadith from the slave of Razzaq and here are those who listen to ahadith from the Razzaq!” Hadhrat Khidr said that, “If you are indeed speaking the truth then tell who am I? He raised his head and said that, “If I am not mistaken, then you are Khidr.” Hadhrat Khidr then said, “From this I came to know that there are such wali of Allaah whom even I cannot recognize.””
    Allaahu Akbar! The pir (please notice that he has no name, no history and no background whatsoever. Just wild imaginations of Tableeghi Jamaa’at) in the above fable did not even raise his head and answered the questions of Khidr! And he listens to the Hadith from Allaah? The revelations comes down upon him? If Mirza Ghulam Qadiani makes such a … See Moreclaim all the scholars of Deobandh label him a kafir but what about the Kufr that is in their own books? Barelvis and Deobandi Tableeghi Jamaat – 3 http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/10/barelvis-and-deobandi-tableeghi-jamaat_4243.html

    The advent of another Prophet is quite possible. (Mulla Abdul Hai Farangi Mahli and Mulla Qasim Nanotwi [one of the founder of Deoband, Tahzeer-in-Nas, p.34, Athar Ibn Abbas, p.16)

    Why blame Mirza when there were so many Mirza in Deoband.

    Time for you to cry on Blasphemy uttered by Deobandi Mullahs in their filthy books.

    Do not try to understand the Qur’ân ever. Else, you will go astray. Fifteen “Uloom” (sciences) are required to understand the Book. (“Maulana” Zakaria Kandhalwi, Fazael Amaal, p.2)

    Do not read the Qur’ân with understanding, you will go astray. (Fazaael Aamal, “Maulana” Ashraf Ali Thanwi, p. 216)

    It is mentioned in Aamaal-e-Qur’aani, p. 134 by Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanwi [published by Jasim Book Depot, Urdu Bazaar, Jama Masjid, Delhi] that if a woman has excessive menstrual bleeding, the verse (Surah Al-’Imran: 3:144) should be written on three different pieces of paper, one tied on her right and the other on her left and the third piece of paper with the Qur’ânic verse to be hung below the naval. This verse of the Qur’aan, “Muhammad (sallallahu alaihe wa-sallam) is no more than a Messenger, and indeed (many) Messengers have passed away before him. If he dies or is killed, will you then turn back on your heels (as disbelievers)? And he who turns back on his heels, not the least harm will he do to Allah, and Allah will give reward to those who are grateful.” [Surah Al-‘Imran: 3:144]

    The holy messenger came to Shah Waliullah (in the 18 century!) and said, “Why do you worry? Your children are the same as mine.” (Ashraf Ali Thanwi, Hikayat-ul-Awlia)
    The prophet laid the foundation of Darul-Uloom, Deoband, India (in the 19th century) He comes to check accounts of the school. He has learnt the Urdu language. (Mubasshirat-e-Darul Uloom, and Deoband Number of the Darul-Uloom)

    When Shah Waliullah was in his mother’s womb, she said a prayer. Two tiny hands (too) appeared for prayer. She was frightened. Her husband said, “You have Qutubul-Aqtab (Wali of Walis) in your womb (Hikayat-e-Awlia, p. 17 Ashraf Ali Thanwi) What a break-through!

    The prophet laid the foundation of Darul-Uloom, Deoband, India (in the 19th century) He comes to check accounts of the school. He has learnt the Urdu language. (Mubasshirat-e-Darul Uloom, and Deoband Number of the Darul-Uloom)
    Jibran Sahab,

    Dil aur Jigar Tham kar parh lijay:

    The advent of another Prophet is quite possible. (Mulla Abdul Hai Farangi Mahli and Mulla Qasim Nanotwi, Tahzeer-in-Nas, p.34, Athar Ibn Abbas, p.16) Why blame Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani only?

    Risala Tazkara of Darul-uloom Deoband of 1965 claims: Anyone suffering from malaria who took dust from the grave of “Maulana” Yaqoob Nanotwi and tied this dust to his body, found instant relief.
    Allaah cuts jokes with the Ulama of Deoband. One of them went to a well for “Wudu” (Ablution) He lowered the bucket in the well. It came back full of silver. The Holy man said to Allaah: Don’t kid around! I am getting late for prayers. He lowered the bucket in again and this time it came back full of gold. (Risala Tazkara of Darul-uloom Deoband of April 1965)

  • aley :
    @Zulfiqar Haider Another evidence of hypocrite and visionless Islamists, they call for freedom of “Qibla-e-Awal” from the occupation of Israelis but shouldn’t they first put their house in order? The Deoband Ulema claim it loud and bold, on their flags and banners “al arz o lillah” “All Land belongs to Allah Almighty!!”

    More shame:

    Aamaal-e-Qur’aani, p. 134 by Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanwi [published by Jasim Book Depot, Urdu Bazaar, Jama Masjid, Delhi] The book and other books used by Deobandis and Barelvi book Shama Shabistan-e-Raza by Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi have many Chilla, Wazeefa and Black Magic Tricks and Taweez Ganda through using Quran [I have read every single one of them] and for Magic following is the Punishment as per Islamic Law.

    Do you know that the penalty of practicing Black Magic/Sorcery as per Islam? Mullahs issue Fatwa of Murder from Pulpit whereas practicing Magic is punishable by Death in Islam.

    I wonder have you read Deobandi’s Magic Books e.g. Aaml-e-Qurani/Beheshti Zewar, Maktoobat-e-Biyaz Yaqoobi etc. or Barelvi Magic Book name Shama Shabistan-e-Raza by Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi.

    I wont quote Fatwa of Mullahs but commandment from Prophet Mohammad [PBUH]
    “The hadd (prescribed punishment) for the practitioner of magic is a blow with the sword (i.e., execution).” (Sunnan Tirmidhi, Daaraqutni, Mustadrak al-Haakim, Sunan al Bayhaqi]

    Justice Taqi Usmani and Rafi Usmani’s Publication House “Daarul Ishaat” publish such filthy books and earn million.

  • aley :
    @Zulfiqar Haider
    Another evidence of hypocrite and visionless Islamists, they call for freedom of “Qibla-e-Awal” from the occupation of Israelis but shouldn’t they first put their house in order? The Deoband Ulema claim it loud and bold, on their flags and banners “al arz o lillah” “All Land belongs to Allah Almighty!!”

    Gems from books which are taught in Deoband and Bareli Madressahs.

    What I have learned through different sources that these Deobandis and Barelvis are basically the same with minor differences they both allegedly follow the Fiqh [Attributed to Imam Abu Haneefah] Hanafi and his followers and books these Deobandi and Barelvi read, quotes of which are as under:

    Radd al-Muhtar ala ad-Dur al-Mukhtar is a book on Islam by 19th century Hanafi Scholar Ibn Abidin. A commentary on Imam al-Haskafi’s Durr al-Mukhtar, it is commonly known as Radd al-Muhtar. It is said to be a compilation of the great Fatwas of Imam Abu Hanifa [May Allah have mercy on his soul], and Hidayah is the name of a famous Hanafi juridical work by Burhan-ud-din Ali bin Abi Bakr al-Marghinani (1152-1197) which is considered widely authoritative as a guide to Fiqh amongst Muslims in Central Asia, Afghanistan and India, and is the basis for much of the Anglo-Islamic law in India and Pakistan.

    Now read the excerpts from these two Books through which Deobandi and Barelvi Calamity in Pakistan want to Implement Islamic Law. Rampant Lal Mosque Anarchist, Binori Town, Madressah Haqqania, Talibans and other such Anarchist called these perversions mentioned below The Islamic Law!

    “QUOTE”

    1 – Be the curse of Allah be on those who reject Imam Abu Hanifa (Muqadimah dar Mukhtar)

    2 – When The Prophet Issa [Jesus – PBUH] will come back he will follow the Madhab [Fiqh] of Abu Hanifa (Muqadimah dar Mukhtar)

    3 – Khidr spent 30 years to learn knowledge from Abu Hanifa, then Qushayri learnt from Khidr during 3 years and he wrote more than 1000 books and put them in a box in the sea. When Isa aley salam will take these books and act upon them. (Muqadimah dar Mukhtar)

    3 – Is someone pays a woman to do zina [adultery] , there is no hadd [no punishment] ( Dar Mukhtar, kitab Hudud, fatawa khaniyah misr vol 3 p 508, kanz daqaiq ed deoband p 180, and this fatwa is attributed to Imam Abu Hanifa while his two students say there is hadd [Adultery Law]. It is well known that the hanafi books of fiqh there is no Chain of Narration [isnad] to their Imam)

    4 – The salary of the prostitute is halal [lawful] (Chalpi shara Wiqayah)

    5 – If he pays a woman to do zina or wati [Adultery or Intercourse] or if he says I will give you so much dirham or she says give me so much, there is no had [no punishment under Adultery Law] (Alamgiri, vol 2 p 168)

    6 – If someone does jima [intercourse] with an animal or with a dead or a young girl and there is no inzal [ejaculation] , then ghusl [bathe] is not wajib [obligatory] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab taharah, masail ghusl, aussi Alamgiri, Kitab taharah)

    7 – If someone does sodomy with a woman who fasts or a man who fasts, their fast is not broken (Hidayah, Kitab Sawm)

    8 – If a young boy of 10 does Jima [intercourse] with a balighah [adult] Woman, there is no Ghusl [bathe]( Alamgiri Kitab taharah)

    9 – If someone enters his penis in his dubur (anus), then ghusl is not obligatory (Dar Mukhtar Kitab taharah Masail Ghusl)

    10 – If a man in his dubur [anus] or a woman in her vagina enters the penis of the dead, or his finger, or wood, there is no ghusl [bathe](Hidayah Kitab Taharah)

    11 – If someone enters the penis of an animal in her vagina or dubur [anus], the ghusl [bathe] is not wajib [obligatory] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab Taharah Masail Ghusl)

    12 – If someone enters the penis of a boy without desire in her vagina or dubur [anus], the ghusl [bathe] is not wajib [obligatory] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab taharah Masail Ghusl)

    13 – After doing Jima [Intercourse] with a young girl, it is not necessary to clean his penis (Dar Mukhtar Kitab taharah Masail Ghusl)

    14 – If someone does jima [intercourse] with a virgin and the maidenhead is not broken, ghusl [bathe] is not wajib [obligatory] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab taharah Masail Ghusl)

    15 – If someone does wati [intercourse] in the dubur [have anal sex or commit bestiality] of an animal or in his anus and there is no inzal, then Ghusl [bathe] is not wajib [obligatory] (Hidayah kitab taharah)

    16 – If the balighah woman [adult woman] does wati [intercourse] with a young boy or with a crazy, then the woman has no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)

    17 – If someone does wati [intercourse] with a non balighah woman [non adult woman], or with a dead or an animal, there is no hadd [punishment] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)

    18 – If someone does zina [adultery] with the salve of his child or great child, there is no hadd (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)

    19 – If someone does zina [adultery] with the slave of grand father or grand mother, there is no Hadd [Punishment for Adultery](Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)

    20 – If someone has a slave in rahn (security for loan) and he does zina [adultery], there is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)

    21 – If someone does nikah [Marriage] with a mahram [sister, mother or daughter or real blood aunt] for ever woman and consider it halal [lawful], there is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery](Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)

    22 – The woman that are for ever forbidden, and he does nikah and he even if he considers that haram [Unlawful] , there is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud, et Alamgiri who attribute that to Imam Abu Hanifa)

    23 – If he does nikah [marriage] with a woman and joins in nikah his wife’s sister or mother, there is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] (Alamgiri)

    24 – If he does temporary marriage [Muta’ah] and he considers that haram [Unlawful], there is no hadd [[Punishment for Adultery] (Alamgiri)

    25 – If someone does nikah with a woman who is married before, and he knows she has a husband and it is haram [Unlawful] , there is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] Fatawa Khaniya misr vol 3 p 508)

    26 – There is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] of zina [Adultery] for the one who cannot speak, neither any hadd [Punishment for Adultery] for something else, even if the witness are present and he admits with isharah [gesture] or by writing (Alamgiri misr, vol 2 p 168)

    27 – If someone kidnaps a slave, does zina [Adultery] and pay his responsible [Owner] for her price, there is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)

    28 – If someone gives permission to another to do zina [Intercourse] with his slave, there is no hadd [Punishment for Adultery] (Alamgiri vol 2 p 169)

    29 – If the Khalifah or the imam or the king does zina [ADULTERY] there is no hadd [PUNISHMENT] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud) [also in Hidaya and that Hidaya is being taught in Pakistani Madressah]

    30 – There is no hadd for sodomy [Anal Intercourse] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)

    31 – If someone does zina [ADULTERY] in dar ul harb [Land/Country of Infidels] or in the land of revolted people, there is no hadd [PUNISHMENT] (Dar Mukhtar Kitab hudud)

    32 – The muslim can take riba [Interest] from a Infidel, in dar ul harb [Land/Country of Infidels] (Dar Mukhtar vol 4 p 209)

    33 – This is also true for the one who becomes muslim and does not do Hijrah, whe can take riba from him( Dar Mukhtar vol 4 p 210)

    34 – If someone prays holding a dog in his hands, his prayer is not fasid [INVALID] (Dar Mukhtar misr vol 1 p 153)

    35 – If someone in prayer watches the private part of a woman, his prayer [Salat] is not broken [means it will remain valid] ( Maraqi Al falah misr vol 1 p 200)

    36 – If someone watches at book of fiqh during prayer, is prayer is not broken.
    (Alamgiri vol,1 p 106)

    37 – If someone prays and holds the Quran and reads from it, is prayer is fasid [Invalid] (Dar Mukhtar vol 1 p 641)

    38 – If in the conditions of Imam in the first cases there is equality, then The one whose wife is more beautiful ( Dar Mukhtar vol 1 p 412)

    39 – Then the one who has the biggest head and the shortest member [Penis](Dar Mukhtar vol 1 p 412)

    40 – The meaning of member is penis (Rad Mukhtar Sharh Dar Mukthar, p 413)

    41 – The one who does watch the vagina of a woman in a miror or in water, then the mother of this woman is forbidden to him (Dur Mukhtar, Kitab Nikah, fasl fil Muharamat)

    “UNQUOTE”

  • What a joke that Aal-e–Saud and Saudi Muttawwa Abd-al-Aziz ibn Abd-Allah ibn Baaz issued a Fatwa of Takfeer [Apostasy] against Saddam Hussein [that too after he was no more of any use to Corrupt Aal-e-Saud and Wahhaabi Muttawwas whereas an Anarchist Pakistan Ahl-e-Hadith Scholar Late. Ehsan Elahi Zaheer [who was on the payroll of Aal-e-Saud and Saudi Muttawwas rather he was student of Salafi Islamic scholars such as Muhammad Nasiruddin al-Albani and Abd-al-Aziz ibn Abd-Allah ibn Baaz] had addressed Sddam Hussein and his Ba’ath Party Member [as per Saudi Fatwa “Apostate, Secular, Socialist i.e. KAAFIR] REFERENCE: Ehsan Elahi Zaheer URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P68GstP37go
    Corrupt, Vile & Filthy: Arabs, Aal-e-Saud, & Wahhaabis.
    http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2010/06/corrupt-vile-filthy-arabs-aal-e-saud.html

  • Derborence – Vom Bergsturz zum Naturschutzgebiet…

    Selten wird sich jemand bereitfinden, für ein Stück Land, das nach den üblichen Begriffen als „wertlos”, weil keinen Ertrag bringend, bezeichnet werden muß, Geld auszugeben. Und doch geschieht dies immer wieder, dann nämlich, wenn es sich darum handelt…

  • @Aamir Mughal
    All your questions or objections to Fiqh -e- hanafiya were answered on the said website and as for Shabistan I was very surprised you read the book and you still couldnt understand that the book has nothing to do with magic all taveez and gandas are not for bringing mehboob to your qaddams please check before making such claims.
    http :// http://www.umm-ul- qura. org/info/user_pages/page.asp?art_id=113

  • A very biased, naive, and provocative article. U didn’t write anything about mythical and bloodshedding Iranian revolution. U didn’t do any justice. Mr. Mughal!! Are u too on payroll by some agency?