Original Articles

Nawaz Sharif kafir? No, Takfiri mullah kafir


Khariji mullahs threaten Nawaz Sharif with fatwa of kufr (apostasy) in retribution of his statement on Ahmadis; they also term Ahmadi massacre in Lahore as an Ahmadi conspiracy against Islam and Pakistan

Pakistan’s opposition leader and chief of Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz Group (PML-N) Nawaz Sharif has been censured by clerics of different religious parties as Mr Sharif spoke in friendly terms about the Ahmadi sect.

Mr Sharif was expressing solidarity with the Ahmadis who came under a bloody attack by terrorists of Taliban / Sipah-e-Sahaba on Friday May 28, 2010, leaving over 90 of them dead and scores of others injured. 

In a statement on Saturday June 06, 2010, in Lahore, Mr Sharif expressed commiseration toward the Ahmadi community, calling them “our brothers and sisters” and an “asset for Pakistan”.

This set orthodox Muslim clerics on fire since mullahs were able to pressurize Pakistan parliament in 1974 to declare Ahmadis as official non-Muslims, and many mullahs and their followers look on them as “traitors”.

Mr Sharif at once came under verbal attack from the Wafaqul Madaris al Arabia, a madrassah association of Deobandi sect, which stated that Mr Sharif should be ashamed of calling Ahmadis as our brothers. The Wafaqul Madaris al Arabia statement mentioned Ahmadis as “traitors” and “infidels” and stressed that they could not be the brothers of Muslims. It warned Mr. Sharif to revoke his statement.

Other religious parties also expressed resentment over Mr. Sharif’s statement. Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI) president Maulana Sami-ul-Haq even threatened that his party would launch a countrywide protest if Mr. Sharif did not retract his statement.

In the latest development, a leading mullah of India declared that if Nawaz Sharif does not revoke his statement on Ahamadis, he will be deemed an infidel. Mufti Habibur Rehman Ludhianwi advised Nawaz Sharif to repent for calling Qadianis (Ahmadis) as his brothers and sisters. Mufti  said that Qadianis are non Mulsims and no Muslim is allowed to have any relationship with them. He also said that if Nawaz Sharif did not repent, he will be considered as an apostate.

Source: http://www.express.com.pk/epaper/PoPupwindow.aspx?newsID=1100964764&Issue=NP_LHE&Date=20100609

What is Nawaz Sharif’s crime (or sin)?

He declared Ahmadis as our brothers and sisters and as an asset for the country.

Why are mullahs upset?

Because they are rabid dogs; their only aim is to create hatred and mischief (fasaad) in Pakistan and the wider world.

Here are some examples of mullahs’ reaction to Nawaz Sharif’s statement:

Nawaz should seek pardon for giving pro-Qadianis statement: Wafaq-ul-Madaris

ISLAMABAD: The religious leaders of the Wafaq-ul-Madaris Arabia on Sunday said that Mian Nawaz Sharif should not give pro-qadiyanis statements, as the Qadiyanis are disbelievers of the last Prophet Hazrat Muhammad (PBUH) and seditious to Islam.

Religious scholars including Maulana Salim Ullah Khan, Maulana Qari Hanif Jalandhari, Maulana Dr. Abdul Razzaq and Maulana Anwar-Ul-Haq while expressing their reactions against the statement of Mian Nawaz Sharif regarding Qadianis said that he should not betray the masses for his political interests and should request pardon to Allah. Declaring Qadianis an asset, who are the traitors of Islam and the country, reflects ignorance of Nawaz Sharif, they added.

They said that the Qadianis are disbelievers of the finality of Prophet hood of Hazrat Muhammad (PBUH) and the enemies of Muslims, adding that they cannot be the brothers of Muslim till they do not embrace Islam and seek pardon for their past to Allah. The Qadiyanis always subverted the constitution, parliament and judiciary of Pakistan and they did not miss any opportunity to harm Islam and Pakistan.
The religious scholars said that Nawaz Sharif should withdraw his dubious statement and seek pardon from Almighty Allah.

Source: http://regionaltimes.com/07jun2010/backpagenews/nawaz.htm

Sharif’s statement on Ahmadis angers clerics

June 07, 2010

Wafaqul Madaris al Arabia asks PML-N chief to retract his statement

ISLAMABAD: Top leaders of an organisation representing Deobandi madrassas across the country have reprimanded PML-N chief Nawaz Sharif for calling members of the Ahmadiyya community as “brothers” of Muslims.

“Sharif should be ashamed of calling them brothers of Muslims,” said a statement issued by the Wafaqul Madaris al Arabia (WMA).

Sharif said in Lahore on Saturday that Ahmadis were as important citizens of Pakistan as people from other religions and called them an asset.

He made the statement to express solidarity with the Ahmadiyya community following last month’s two synchronised attacks on their places of worship in Lahore which claimed more than 80 lives with many more injured.

In a statement issued here on Sunday, leaders of the Wafaqul Madaris al Arabia – an umbrella organisation of more than 12,000 Deobandi madrassas – called Ahmadis “traitors”.

WMA leaders Maulana Salimullah Khan and Qari Hafeez Jahalindri urged Sharif to retract his statement and advised him not to “defy religion for petty political gains.”

The statement termed the Ahmadis as “infidels” and said that they could not be brothers of Muslims until they convert to Islam again.

Ahmadis were declared a minority under the 1973 constitution – a move that some people believe intensified hatred against Ahmadis.

Published in the Express Tribune, June 7th, 2010.

Source: http://tribune.com.pk/story/19379/sharif%E2%80%99s-statement-on-ahmadis-angers-clerics/

Source: http://www.express.com.pk/epaper/PoPupwindow.aspx?newsID=1100964765&Issue=NP_LHE&Date=20100609

Ripples in political, religious circles

Sharif’s comments on the Ahmedis drew sharp criticism from religious parties like Khatm-e-Nabuwat Movement, Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam and Jamaat-e-Islami.

Maulana Ilyas Chinauti, the head of KNM, which has been at the forefront of the movement against Ahmedis,said Sharif should seek “forgiveness from Allah and the people of Pakistan for calling the Ahmedis his brothers”.

“Ahmedis are traitors and they deserve no sympathy whatsoever. Nawaz Sharif is trying to please the US by showing sympathy for Ahmedis,” he said. Sharif had hurt the feeling of all Muslims and KNM would stage protests till he apologised, he said.

JUI president Maulana Samiul Haq said his party would launch a countrywide protest if Sharif did not take back his statement.

Jamaat-e-Islami leader Farid Paracha said it was unfortunate that the PML-N had started toeing the line of the US. Paracha said Ahmedis could never be “brothers or friends” of Muslims and a “true Muslim must not develop any relation with Ahmedis”. PTI

Source: http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Sharif-stuns-Pakistan–Calls-Ahmedis-brothers/630800/

Protest staged against Qadianis

Tuesday, June 08, 2010
Bureau report

PESHAWAR: Aalami Majlis-Tahaffuz-e-Khatam-e-Nabuwwat staged protest outside the Peshawar Press Club on Monday, asking the government to take action against Qadianis.

Carrying banners and placards, the activists chanted slogans against Qadianis and asked the Pakistan Muslim League chief Mian Nawaz Sharif to clarify his position on his recent statement.

Criticising Qadianis, the speaker termed them as enemies of Islam and the state. They asked the government to take action against them for their blasphemous activities.

They reiterated to render sacrifices of their lives to protect the honour and respect of their holy prophet (PBUH) and the holy Quran and not allow anyone to continue insulting their religion and prophets.

JTI activists protest sacrilegious caricatures: Jamiat Talaba-e-Islam activists staged demonstration against the blasphemous caricatures and reiterated their commitment to render sacrifices of their lives to protect sanctity of the Holy Prophet (PBUH).

Carrying banners and placards, the activists gathered outside the Peshawar Press Club and chanted slogans against anti-Islamic forces and urged the government to sever diplomatic ties with Western countries.

Source: http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=243698

Attack on Ahmadis was a conspiracy: MTKN

June 09, 2010

LAHORE: Leaders of Muttahida Tehrik-e-Khatm-e-Nabuwat said on Wednesday that Lahore attacks were a conspiracy to repeal laws against Ahmadis, reported BBC Urdu.

Maulana Zahidul Rashdi, founding member of the organisation, read a joint statement at the meeting’s conclusion that said that the attack on Ahmadis is being used to create suspicions about the concept of Khatm-e-Nabuwat i.e. Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) being the last prophet.

The meeting that took place in Muslim Town, Lahore, included members of 13 religious and political organistations including JUI-F, Jamaat-ud-Dawa and 11 others.

Just a few days back, religious leaders had shown their contempt for Nawaz Sharif’s statement where he referred to the Ahmadi community as brothers.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/19971/attack-on-ahmadis-is-a-conspiracy-mtkn/

‘Attack on Ahmedis conspiracy to repeal laws against them’

Wednesday, 09 Jun, 2010

LAHORE: A gathering of the leaders of 13 religious and political parties in Lahore claimed that the attack on Ahmedis on May 28 was part of a conspiracy to repeal the laws against them, BBCUrdu reported.

The meeting was held in an office of the Majlis Ahrar Islam in Lahore’s Muslim Town. The parties concluded that a conspiracy was in place to debate the laws against Ahmedis, the report said.

Maulana Zahidul Rashdi, who is a founding member of the Muttahida Tehrik-i-Khatm-i-Nabuwat and also the Secretary-General of the Pakistan Shariat Council, read the joint statement at the meeting’s conclusion: The attack on Ahmedis is being used as an excuse to generate suspicions regarding the concept of khatm-i-nabuwat.

The gathering was attended by leaders of the Jamaat-i-Islami, Jamiat-i-ulema-i-Islam Fazlur Rahman group, Jamaatud Dawa and Markazi Jamaat-i-Ahl-i-Sunnat among others.

During the meeting, Maulana Ilyas Chinioti, a member of the PML-N and the Punjab provincial assembly, condemned Nawaz Sharif’s statement in which he had sympathised with the Ahmedis and called them his brothers.

The meeting’s participants demanded that Nawaz Sharif immediately withdraw his statement.

Source: http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/pakistan/04-ahmedis-laws-religious-groups-qs-08?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+dawn/news/pakistan+(DAWN.COM+-+Pakistan+News)

How do critical Pakistanis (not blind followers of rabid mullahs) think about mulllahs’ stance against Nawaz Sharif?

Here is a selection of comments from pkpolitics:

hkbajwa said:

Whatever Ahmadis have done for the countries they call their home, they have done so for the love of that country and no other reason.

And as far as Islam is concerned, i would very much like to know what glorious contributions any mullah or his supporter has made. Other than spreading hatred, promoting discrimination, justifying violence and loudly proclaiming their intolerance for all that are not like them that is.

The stupidity of the mullas of course knows no bounds. To wish peace upon a stranger (salam) is no crime, and neither is it a crime to consider somebody a brother.

These bearded monkeys are not conerned about an insult to islam. They are concerned with nothing other than a perpetuation of their own power. There is no greater threat to their power than a group of people who refuse to consider themselves non-muslims and also refuse to be cowed by the mullahs.

They fail to realize that their very existence, their promotion of hatred and violence and their shameless profiteering off the faith of others is the greatest blasphemy against islam.

Sweet-truth said:

If we can get rid of all fasadi moulvis this country would be a better place and I say much better place to live. These fasadi moulvis are the BIGGEST FITNA within our religion and today wahtever negative happening with Islam is because of these fasadi moulvis. They issue ceritificates of Kafor day in day out.

Now they are calling NS a kafir even NS has provided these moulvis considerable support in the past and even today NS and his party have close links with some banned militant groups. Nawaz Sharif made political alliances with Jamat Islami in the past but soon realised his mistakes and kicked out Jamat Islami from the alliance. Now he keeps distance from Jamat and their fanatical moulvis.

Question: What is the biggest fitna in Islam?
Answer: Jamat Islami

acsher said:

1-they are better pakistanis than you and me because not only were they born in this country but also chose to call it their homeland despite all the opposition and problems that they had to face here!

2-They are our brothers because they speak, walk, talk , think, feel like us 99.9% and if for instance I go abroad and need help or want to socialize there then 10 out of 10 times I would prefer a “Qadyani, “Hindu”, “Christian” PAKISTANI over artificial and text books brotherhood of Saudis, Afghans, Turks, Egyptians etc! 😉

hkbajwa said:

to all mullahs and their supporters:

The sad part is that there is genuinely no difference between you preaching your exclusion of non-muslims and the dumba$$ redneck in Texas preaching “white supremacy”.

You are both devoid of love and compassion, you are both incurably dogmatic and you are both incapable of understanding that the world has moved beyond black and white and can now be viewed in technicolor.

one can only withhold love and compassion if one is at heart a small and hateful person.

You are so caught up in the whole affiliation thing that you are completely and utterly blind to the rest of humanity.

But don’t worry.. nobody can force you to befriend a non-muslim, nor would anybody wish to.

Thankfully you belong to the minority of people whose faith is guided by fear, hatred and a completely misplaced sense of superiority.

You are at heart a non-muslim. I say that because in your “perfect muslim society” a despicable caste system dividing muslims and non-muslims will be a reality. And you will sit on your brahman like perch and look down upon all others who are not of your caste. what a terrible shame. But it’s thankfully only your loss.

Anyhow go ahead and preach your hateful stupidity to your heart’s content. I have complete faith that humanity is better than your hatred thank god.

@ all the people sensible enough to see the idiocy of the mullahs:

bravo.

It matters not what you believe, what you worship and what you call yourself. As long as your faith makes you compassionate enough to open your heart to those who belive differently, you are blessed.

hkbajwa said:

In case you haven’t realized, the mullahs are the biggest galvanizing force for ahmedis. For every bit of stupidity uttered by the mullahs, more and more people become ahmedi.

Mullahs have been persecuting ahmedis for more than a century, yet have utterly failed to make any difference to the faith of the community. They have succeeded in establishing pakistan as a hub of intolerance towards minorities indeed, but only the muslims lose on that account.

Mullahs are the most disturbing symptom of the decay that has beset the ummah. Were the mullahs declawed here the way they were in turkey, Pakistan would have been miles ahead of turkey. Yet instead we languish at the brink of failure. Gee thanks ole mullah buddies.

You ask :
How are the MULLAH promoting hatred, violence, shameless profiteering off the faith of others ?

Fatwahs to kill, mob lynchings egged on by mullahs, preaching hatred and enmity towards other sects and religions, demanding the suppression of women, claiming the right to decide who’s righteous and who’s not and a passive approval of the inhuman violence perpetrated by their jihadis. These are all ways in which they promote hatred and violence. If you are stupid enough to not see that or ignorant enough to blame it on the jews well then so be it. Doesn’t change the facts.

A useful suggestion by a fellow blogger

by Acsher

Qadyanis are our brothers and countrymen

Hindus are our brothers and countrymen

Christians are our brother and countrymen

Every Pakistani (irrespective of his cast, creed, religion) is our brother and as much a citizen of pakistan as we are!

I think every pakistani should utter these words and force these “Dariyal Mullas” to declare every one of us “Kafir” until they find themselves as the minority and have to run for their lives in front of a so-called “kafir” majority!

Only then this self-appointed divine brigade could feel the music of being a helpless minority (who they blackmail every now and then)!

Kafir kafir, khariji mullah kafir, jo na manay, woh bhi kafir

About the author

Abdul Nishapuri

122 Comments

Click here to post a comment
  • Kamran Shafi writes in support of Ahmadis, and Nawaz Sharif’s statement:

    To revert to the terrible atrocity perpetrated on our Ahmadi brothers and sisters, first off, my deep gratitude to the Pakistan Army for burying with full military honours the well-considered Maj-Gen (retd) Nasir Ahmed Chaudhry, a 90-year old gentleman who was gunned down in cold blood with the worshippers. Well done, my army, and may this spirit of loyalty and fairness and rectitude guide the high command in other matters too. Today I am a proud former soldier.

    My piece of last week was more a personal journey in time: remembering old friends and recalling a time when there was no distinction between Sunnis and Shias and Ahmadis and Bohris and Aga Khanis and what have you, each worshipping his God in his own way, but all equal citizens of the state. This week we must look at the reaction of the state to the killings of Ahmadis as compared to that which is put on display when others are similarly butchered by people who cannot abide those who do not subscribe to their own, narrow beliefs.

    For, it is a sad fact that others, whether they be Shias or Sunnis of this or that sect and creed and belief, all have been targets of the obscurantist killers of humanity. Indeed, our Christian and Hindu and Sikh brothers and sisters have likewise been targeted by cruel murderers. But every time that some outrage has taken place, political leaders have bestirred themselves and visited the homes of those killed. Why not this time?

    The Ahmadis might be considered non-Muslim by the state; surely they are still Pakistani? Surely, then, all of the protections and succour that a state should provide its citizens are to be extended to them too?

    Far more than this, please note that the compensation which is announced immediately for those killed or injured as a result of such wanton acts in the case of others, was announced five days after the event in the case of the Ahmadis (Rs500,000 and 100,000 respectively for those killed and injured). Indeed, look at the language used while announcing compensation: “Jo maraygaey” for those who were killed. Surely there are kinder terms that could have been used, such as “Jo jaan bahak huay”; “Jo halaak huay”; even “Jo faut huay”!

    Why are we so cruel towards the poor Ahmadis, can some one please tell me?

    Let me add in passing that my Ahmadi friends tell me that the reply of their community to the offer of compensation is that the community is well placed to look after its own, thank you very much, and that the compensation which is to be paid should be transferred to the people of Hunza-Gojal for the relief work which is ongoing and which will surely increase as the disaster widens.

    Pakistan is a sad, sad place my friends; a twisted and pitiless and heartless caricature of what our founding fathers had in mind. I am heartbroken. Kudos, however, to Nawaz Sharif for openly saying that the Ahmadis are our brothers. Of course, it is another matter that the obscurantist elements have jumped down his throat! More strength to him I say.

    http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/the-newspaper/columnists/21-kamran-shafi-a-sad-place-indeed-860-sk-04

  • ابن انشا نے کہا تھا دائرے کی ایک اور قسم ہے دائرہ ے اسلام ،یہ وہ دائرہ ہے جس میں پہلے لوگوں کو داخل کیا جاتا تھا اب صرف خارج کیا جاتا ہے

    اسلام کا دائرہ دن با دن چھوٹا ہوتا جا رہا ہے ،خاص طور پر پاکستان کافر پروڈکٹ میں خاصا خود کفیل ہو گیا ہے .پہلے ایک بڑا دائرہ ہے جو مسلمان اور کافر کا ہے .پھر مسلمانوں میں میں کافر ہیں جو کبھی مسلمان اور کبھی کافر کہلاتے ہیں ،کبھی یہ کہا جاتا ہے کے جس نے کلمہ پڑھا وہ مسلمان پھر ووہی مولوی کہتا ہے کے فلاں کافر ہے حلانکے وھو بھی کلمہ گو ہی ہوتا ہے ، امریکا اور ایران کا معملا ہوتا ہے تو کفر اور اسلام کی جنگ اور امّت مسلمہ بن جاتی ہے ،پر ووہی گروہ شیعوں کو کافر بھی کہتا ہے .اور یہ بھی کہتا ہے کے کافر کو بھی کافر نہ کہو سمجھ نہیں اتی .

  • What about CJ????

    ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry remarked that it was a criminal negligence to bring changes in the documents like Objectives Resolution as former president General (retd) Zia ul Haq tampered with the Constitution in 1985 however, the sitting parliament had done a good job by undoing this tampering. At one point Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry observed that the word ‘freely’ was omitted from the Objectives Resolution in 1985 by a dictator, which was an act of criminal negligence, but the then parliament surprisingly didn’t take notice of it. He said the Constitution is a sacred document and no person can tamper with it. The chief justice said credit must go to the present parliament, which after 25 years took notice of the brazen act of removing the word relating to the minorities’ rights, and restored the word ‘freely’ in the Objectives Resolution, which had always been part of the Constitution. The chief justice further said that the court is protecting the fundamental rights of the minorities and the government after the Gojra incident has provided full protection to the minorities. “We are bound to protect their rights as a nation but there are some individual who create trouble.” CJ lauds parliament for undoing changes in Objectives Resolution Wednesday, June 09, 2010 Says minorities’ rights have to be protected; Hamid says parliament should have no role in judges’ appointment By Sohail Khan http://thenews.jang.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=29367

    ISLAMABAD: Heading a 17-member larger bench of the Supreme Court on Tuesday, Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry termed as criminal negligence the deletion of a word about the rights of minorities from the Objectives Resolution during the regime of General Ziaul Haq in 1985. Ziaul Haq had omitted the word “freely” from the Objectives Resolution, which was made substantive part of the 1973 Constitution under the Revival of Constitutional Order No. 14. The clause of Objectives Resolution before deletion of the word ‘freely’ read, “Wherein adequate provision shall be made for the minorities to ‘freely’ profess and practice their religions and develop their culture.” CJP raps change in Objectives Resolution * Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry says deletion of clause on rights of minorities was ‘criminal negligence’ * Appreciates incumbent parliament for taking notice of removal of clause by Gen Zia’s govt in 1985 By Masood Rehman Wednesday, June 09, 2010 http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=201069\story_9-6-2010_pg1_1

    ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry on Tuesday praised the parliament for undoing a wrong done by the legislature in 1985 (through a constitutional amendment) when it removed the word ‘freely’ from a clause of the Objectives Resolution that upheld the minorities’ right to practise their religion. The word “freely” was deleted from the Objectives Resolution when parliament passed the 8th Amendment after indemnifying all orders introduced through the President’s Order No 14 of 1985 and actions, including the July 1977 military takeover by Gen Zia-ul-Haq and extending discretion of dissolving the National Assembly, by invoking Article 58(2)b of the Constitution. After the passage of the 18th Amendment, the Objectives Resolution now reads: “Wherein adequate provision shall be made for the minorities freely to profess and practise their religions and develop their culture.” The CJ said: “Credit goes to the sitting parliament that they reinserted the word back to the Objectives Resolution.” He said that nobody realised the blunder right from 1985 till the 18th Amendment was passed, even though the Objectives Resolution was a preamble to the Constitution even at the time when RCO (Revival of Constitution Order) was promulgated. CJ lauds parliament for correcting historic wrong By Nasir Iqbal Wednesday, 09 Jun, 2010 http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/the-newspaper/front-page/ziaera-deletion-from-objectives-resolution-criticised-cj-lauds-parliament-for-correcting-historic-wrong-960

  • Nawaz Sharif kafir? No, khariji mullah kafir
    ===============================

    Kafir Factories???

    Heresy, Apostasy & Misuse of Blasphemy Law – 1
    http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/11/heresy-apostasy-misuse-of-blasphemy-law.html

    Heresy, Apostasy & Misuse of Blasphemy Law – 2
    Mullahs often raise Hue and Cry over blasphemy but one wonders who would take these Mullahs to the court of law. http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/11/heresy-apostasy-misuse-of-blasphemy-law_10.html

    Heresy, Apostasy & Misuse of Blasphemy Law – 3 Now read was to how Deobandi/Sufis and Barelvis are indulged in Blasphemy
    http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/11/heresy-apostasy-misuse-of-blasphemy-law_771.html

    Heresy, Apostasy & Misuse of Blasphemy Law – 4
    http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/11/heresy-apostasy-misuse-of-blasphemy-law_7697.html This Blasphemy Law doesn’t even spare the Maulvis! You are worried about Late Jagdesh Kumar for being killed for alleged Blasphemy. In this Godforsaken Land we call Islamic Republic of Pakistan these Rogue Pakistanis [call themselves Muslims] don’t even spare an Imam of the Mosuqe for Blasphemy. Read………

    Heresy, Apostasy & Misuse of Blasphemy Law – 5
    http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/11/heresy-apostasy-misuse-of-blasphemy-law_4971.html Administring Justice and awarding punishment is the responsibility of the Ruler/State [even in the harshest Islamic State] not of the Masses or Mullahs. A detail view is as under for kind perusal. I guarantee you that those who have done the above deed would also have been the most ignorant about Islam, Quran and Shariah.
    NEED TO CHECK MISUSE OF BLASPHEMY LAW (28 May 2000) EDITOR’S NOTE: An article entitled “Need to Check Misuse of Blasphemy Law” by Qazi Faez Isa, was published in DAWN, Karachi, on Sunday, May 28, 2000

  • Mawdudi was Kaafir as well?

    “QUOTE”

    A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE MAUDUDI CALAMITY

    In order to master any subject, it is incumbent that one remain in the company and benefit from the master of that subject. It is an accepted fact that for any simple or artistic occupation a teacher or even a guide is necessary. Without these even an intelligent and genius cannot reach the desired stage, be it in the fields of engineering, medicine, or any other subject for that matter. For every occupation or trade it is necessary and incumbent that one should at least earn the basics from a teacher. In this manner, when it is necessary to seek knowledge and guidance in materialistic fields, how can it be possible to attain the Uloom of Nabuwwat – teachings of the Ambiya [A.S] – and the intricacies of the Shari’ah without the guidance of a tutor? The sciences of this nature are beyond the grasp of human intelligence. They have reached the Ummah through the Wahi (revelation) of the Almighty, and continues through heavenly training, rearing, divine commands, instructions and guidance. Then in these Divine Sciences the attention and considerations of the tutor and guide; and the practical participation in his company has a more important bearing than words. The attaining of correct thinking, understanding and practical Tarbiyah is more important than only attaining knowledge. On that ground, the longer the companionship of a master, the more benefit and experience one will reap. The more perfect the tutor, the more benefit and excellence will be attained.

    As the purpose of the Uloom-e-Nabuwwat is the guidance of the creation of Allah, in its understanding, there is a strong probability, through the enmity of the accursed Shaitan, to be led astray. The Shaitan does not interfere where one strives to attain perfection in material aspects. The Shaitan sits in comfort. He does not need to interfere, nor is it necessary for him to show his enmity. However, where the hereafter and religion are concerned, the Shaitan becomes restless in creating mischief. He uses his strength in every possible manner, where success and Hidayat may be turned into ruin and to cause deviation from the straight path. The greatest asset of the accursed Iblees is ‘Talbees’, that is to mix the truth with falsehood in such a manner, that where a thing outwardly appears to be beneficial, in reality it becomes a source of wrong doing and detriment. Then too, bearing in mind that the tricks of the human Nafs supercedes this, it is human nature to be arrogant, haughty, deceptive, show-off and have love for rank and high status. These are such diseases that it is difficult to eradicate them even after lengthy training and discipline.

    For this reason, it is incumbent to remain in the companionship of a master for quite some time, in order to save oneself from the effects of the Shaitan. If Allah’s grace and mercy are present, then surely one reforms, otherwise, the human just wanders around in the desert of knowledge and intellectualism.

    After studying the educational history of the world, this point becomes very clear that all the mischief and chaos that were created, were all at the hands of intellectuals and geniuses. During the period of knowledge a greater portion of Fitnah (mischief) appeared by the way of Ilm (knowledge). Even among the Ulama-e-Haq, many geniuses due to their sharp intelligence and eccentricity became victims of their wrong thoughts and ideas. This fact became evident that by completely relying on their own acuteness and flowing intellect, they became entangled in Ilm Kibr (educational arrogance), and self-conceited of their own views. They were not fortunate enough to undergo a beneficial amount of spiritual training. As a result, this led them to great lengths. In our times, there exist many such examples. Since they possess Ilmi acumen and, as many a time they say or write excellently, they become a cause for additional Fitnah. Those individuals who were not fortunate enough to attain a deep knowledge or a spiritual training, easily become their adherents and quickly begin supporting and endorsing their new ideologies. The Shaitan is always busy in his occupation. A personality that may be of use to guide and direct the Ummah, becomes a means of deviation and ruin for the Ummah. There are examples of these in every era.

    Imam Ghazali [R.T.A] has written in his ‘Maqasid-ul-Falasifah’ that after observing the correctness in the elementary and mathematical sciences of the Greeks, the people began to accept all their teachings as correct. They accepted the teachings of the Greeks even in the subjects of Theology and natural philosophy, which led them astray. These words of Imam Ghazali are very surprising and true. The Shaitan finds in these situations an ideal opportunity to lead people astray. Well, when the very learned, geniuses and capable can become entangled in such Fitnah, then those personalities who possess very little Ilmi capabilities and have a tremendous ability to write, and are quick witted and intelligent, but void of a spiritual training under an accomplished master; they very quickly become engulfed in self-conceitedness and begin to degrade the Ummah. All the scholarly researches of the Ummah are despised; all the great deeds of the Salaf-us-Saliheen are made a joke of and a laughing stock; and by criticizing every personality from beginning till the end, falls in deep and dangerous pit, becoming a means of leading all humanity into destruction.
    Among such people today is a famous personality by the name of ” Mr. Abul Ala Maududi” Sahab, who was acute and quick witted since childhood, but was troubled by economic difficulties. In the beginning he was employed by the Madinah Periodical at Bijnor. Thereafter, he was attached to the “Muslim”, a magazine of the Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind. After a few years, he was employed by the “Al-Jamiat” Delhi, a journal of the Hamiat Ulama-e-Hind, which was then probably published every third day. His articles captioned, “Tareekh Ke Jawahir Paro” appeared with great luster. In this manner, Maududi Sahab was trained as a writer by Maulana Ahmad Saeed Sahab. After the death of his father, Maududi Sahab was unable to complete his studies, but had to leave studies during the early Arabic primary stages, nor was he fortunate enough to attain a secular education. He later studied English and attained some competence in it. He greatly benefited from the books, magazines and writings of reputable authors of those days. His writing ability increased by the day. Unfortunately, he was unable to benefit from any religious institution, neither became a graduate of modern education, nor did he gain the company of an experienced and proficient Aalim of the Deen. He has admitted this in an article published during the era of United India in reply to some question posed to him by Maulana Abdul-Haq Madni Muradabadi. He was unfortunate to experience the company of Niyaz Fatehpuri, an atheist and infidel.

    By this association and friendship many incorrect tendencies and inclinations were adopted. In 1933 he began publishing the “Tarjuman-ul-Quran” from Hyderabad, Dakkan, wherein he published spending articles. Some Ilmi and literary things began to appear using the best style and methods. At that time, the political situation in the country was very shaky. The movement to free India was in its decisive stages. The best intellectuals of the country were involved in the freedom struggle of India from the British. Maududi Sahab adopted a different stand from the rest and engendered the cry of “Iqamat Deen” and ‘Hukumat-e-Ilahiya”.

    He strongly and forcefully criticised all the factions involved in seeking the freedom of India. His simple and innocent panegyrists thought that Maududi Sahab was the last straw for the valuable Deen. As a result, very quickly praises began to be showered upon him from the pens of Maulana Syed Suleman Nadwi, Maulana Manazir Ahsan Gilani and Maulana Abdul-Majid Daryabadi. Evidently, at that time Maududi Sahab was only a name of an individual. As yet, he had no missionary aim, nor an association or movement. Due to his forceful writings and statements, some among the Ahl-e-Haq began having great hopes in him. By virtue of his preparedness and through the encouragement of Chaudhary Muhammad Niyaz, the foundation of Dar-ul-Islam was laid in Pathankot. The Muslim League and Congress began to be degraded.

    Such articles were written by him, as well as book on the political turmoil of the time appeared whereby he began receiving praises from his followers. The political causes stimulated its acceptance. A meeting was held in Lahore, and the foundation of his Amarat (chairmanship) was formally laid. A speech prepared by him was read out, wherein the duties of a present-day Ameer (leader) were outlined. Among the participants were also such famous personalities as Janab Maulana Manzoor Naumani, Maulana Abul-Hassan Ali Nadwi, Maulana Amin Ahsan Islahi and Maulana Mas’ood Aalam Nadwi. Maududi Sahab was elected the Chief Ameer and the abovementioned four personalities were elected deputy Ameer. The Jamat-e-Islami formally came into existence. Its constitution and charter were published. The public looked forward to it, and from every side hopes began to be attached. Six months had not passed by when Maulana Manzoor Naumani and Maulana Ali Mian Sahab (Abdul Hassan) resigned.

    They had observed his Ilmi deficiencies and lack of sincerity. They were unable to continue their relationship. These gentlemen kept silent and did not inform the Ummah openly and clearly about their reason for disassociating themselves. I was at that time teaching at Jamia Islamia Dabhel. I enquired from these two personalities about their reason for quitting. They said many things, but no satisfactory clarification was given. I understood the view of Late Maulana Mas’ood Aalam and Maulana Amin Ahsan Islahi were quire similar as far as beliefs and conduct were concerned. Hence, they remained for some time as Maududi Sahab’s right hand men. Maulana Mas’ood Aalam assisted through the medium of Arabic literary writings and magnificently translated into Arabic the writings of Maududi Sahab. He also trained a few pupils in this field. Maulana Islahi through his special style and way assisted the Maududi movement, a few excellent books were written on communism and a few other subjects, i.e. interest, alcohol, pardah (veil), etc. A few good books were also written for the modern youth. Some worthy articles were published in the “Tafheemat and Tanqeehat”. Ways and means were adopted to impress the Arabs, especially the Sheikhs of Saudi Arabia.

    Successful strategies were adopted. All those writings that were contributed by Maududi Sahab’s associates were published in such a manner as if all these writers were indebted to him. As a result, the personality of Maududi Sahab gained fame. He reaped fame from the writings of his associates. He is incapable of composing in Arabic or English. The names of translators do not appear on his books that are translated in other languages. It is not mentioned that this book is translated by Mas’ood Aalam or Asim Haddad. People get the notion that this literally intellectual of the Urdu language, is also an Imam of the Arabic language. A short period has passed when Maulana Gilani Sahab and Syed Suleman Nadwi Sahab became aware and foresaw its detrimental effect; that these writings were a means of creating a new Fitnah. He (Maulana Gilani) ceased to address him by the titles conferred on him, such as “Mutakallim-e-Islam”, etc. Maulana Gilani Sahab wrote critical articles under the headings of “Kharjiyat-e-Jadeeda” in Maulana Daryabadi’s “Sidq-e-Jadeed”. Maulana Syed Hussain Ahmed Madni Sahab was perhaps the first among the Ulama who pinpointed this Fitnah in his correspondence. Gradually, other Ulama began to air their views. Sheikh-ul-Hadith Maulana Muhammad Zakariyah Sahab studied all the available printed Maududi literature and wrote a valuable booklet on this subject. It is regretted that this booklet has not been printed yet. In this connection, an teacher of Madrasah Mazahir-ul-Uloom, Saharanpuri; Maulana Zakariyah Quddusi Sahab became inclined towards Maududi Sahab. Taking this into view and trying to correct him, Sheikh-ul-Hadith Sahab wrote a letter to him, explaining all Maududi Sahab’s errors and incorrect interpretations of the Deen.
    This letter has been published in a booklet for titled, “Fitnah Maududiat” (It is now reprinted under the title “Jama’at Islamiyah – Ek Lamha Fikriyah”).
    I admired many things about Maududi Sahab and detested many. For a long time I did not wish to degrade him. I felt that from his innovated style of presentation, the modern generation could benefit. Although at times such compositions appeared from his that it was not possible to endure it, but taking into consideration the Deeni well-being, I tolerated it and kept silent. I did not foresee that this Fitnah would spread worldwide and have a detrimental effect on the Arab world; that every day from his master pen new bud would keep on blossoming and indecent words would be used regarding the Sahaba [R.A] and the Ambiya [A.S]. Later on, such things appeared daily in the “Tafheem-ul-Quran”.

    Now it has become known without doubt that his writings and publications are the greatest Fitnah of the present time, notwithstanding a few beneficial treatises that have appeared, it is the case of “and the sin of them is greater than their usefulness” (Surah Baqarah: 219). Now that stage has been reached where to keep silent seems to be a great crime. It is regretted that for forty years an offensive silence was kept. Now the time has dawned, where without fear of rebuttal and censure all his writings from A to Z should be thoroughly studied with a view to fulfill the demands for the preservation of the Deen with Haq and justice.

    “UNQUOTE”

  • Mawdudi and Khomeini were both Kaafirs [same Mullahs]

    “QUOTE”

    For example Khomeini once made a statement which was published in the Tehran times (Kitaab be Noujawanaan – P8) that if he conquers Madina Munawwarah, he will remove the two idols (Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (May Allah be pleased with them) besides Prophet Mohammad (Peace be upon him). I am certain that no believer will accept such a statement against the great luminaries of Islam. Brother Amin, are we then to condemn only Khomeini and condone Mawdudi knowing well that Mawdudi was a close friend of Khomeini and was sympathetic to his course. In a book titled, ‘Two brothers – Maududi and Khomeini’ page 129, the following statement of Dr Ahmad Farouk Maududi (son of Abul-A’ala Maududi) was published in Roz Naame, Lahore – 29 September 1979, “Allama Khomeini had a very old and close relationship with Abba Jaan (father). Aayaatullah Khomeini translated his (fathers) books in Farsi and included it as a subject in Qum. Allama Khomeini met my father in 1963 during Hajj and my father’s wish was to create a revolutionary in Pakistan similar to Iran. He was concerned about the success of the Iranian revolution till his last breath.’

    Read A book mentioned below to know as to what kind of Filthy Language Mawlana Mawdudi and his brother Khomeini used against Prophets [PBUT] and against the Companions [May Allah be pleased with everyone of them] of Prophet Mohammad [PBUH]. The book has provided the original quotes from Mawdudi’s book with the editions and page number. Mudodi Khumeni do bhai, Moudoodi and Khumeni(shia) two Brothers http://www.scribd.com/doc/15702018/Mudodi-Khumeni-do-bhai-Moudoodi-and-Khumenishia-two-Brothers-a-deep-researc-book-by-Deoband-Ahlesunnat-wal-jamat

    “UNQUOTE”

  • Most of the Blasphemous Narrations about Sihaba Kiram which are being quoted on GEO/JANG/EXPRESS NEWS by Ansar Abbasi, Sabir Shah, Javed Chaudhry and countless others are basically in Khilafat O Malookiyat by Behaya Mawdudi who never knew the Status of Prophets [PBUT] and Companions [May Allah be pleased wwith all of them]

    Read how Mawdudi used Tabbarah:

    A literal translation of a letter entitled: “Tanqeed aur Haqqe Tanqeed” which appeared in the Dhul-Hijjah of the Bayanaat – Karachi by Maulana Muhammad Yoosuf Ludhianwi

    Dearest,

    Assalamualaykum,

    You have a high regard for Maulana Sayyid Abdul Aa’la Maududi. This question may be surprising and shocking to you that why the respected elders of the Ummah are up in arms against Janab Maulana Sayyid Abdul Aa’la Maududi and his ‘Islamic Movement’. I ask you that why did the Ulama oppose Sir Sayyid Ahmed Khan’s ‘Islaah Islam’ movement, Abdullah Chackralwi’s ‘Qur’aanic Movement’, Ghulam Ahmed Parvez’s ‘Tulu Islam’ movement, Dr. Fazkyrragnab’s renewal of Islam movement and the progressive Islam movement of the socialists?

    In answer you will say that each of these, according to their understanding, created a blueprint in their minds and made this their basic standard and foundation. Thereafter, whatever suited and met their standards from the Islam of Muhammad Sallallahu alaihi wa Sallam was incorporated into it, and whatever was unsuitable or against their mode of thinking was either abused, ridiculed, jeered, made a joke of and explained away or far-fetched meanings and interpretations were given so that the original meaning was erased. Obviously their thoughts, senses, feelings, and hearts were not subordinate to Islam, but rather the acceptance or rejection of the tenets of ‘Islam’ was at the mercy of their set-standards. It was incumbent upon the Ulama to tear apart this ‘Is- lamic Talisman’ and bring forward the original Islam of Muhammad SallalLahu alaihi wa Sallam, which has been preserved for the last fourteen hundred years in people against this new calamity of ‘Islamic Thinkers’. You know that the Ulama of this Ummah have carried out their duties whilst disregarding all obstacles. They have been sworn at; they have been painted with all types of labels; they have been ridiculed; they have been pierced with the arrows of accusations; but they (the Ulama) had to carry out their duty, and have verily tried to do so. As long as they have life and the power of speech in them, it must not be expected that they will refrain from committing the “offence” of calling a spade a spade, or day a day, and night a night.

    Now listen! In the same manner Janab Maududi Saheb conceived and created a blueprint, which he presented as the ‘Islamic Movement’, and on which foundation the ‘Jamaat Islami’ came into existence. Today his ‘Jamaat Islami’ has an imprint on the big and small. Allah forbid, my intention is not to convey this, that the law that applies to the previously mentioned individuals also applies to Janab Maududi, as there is a difference in rank and grade. The reason for giving the examples of ‘layer upon layer of darkness’ is only to stress that these people fail to understand the True Islam.

    They are unanimous in creating a new path and a new map for Islam. It is a different question that the path of some are totally different from the teachings of Muhammad Sallallahu alaihi wa Sallam and some have a few differences. What doubt is there in this that all of them have, through the medium of their understanding and thinking, put forward ‘their Islam’ to the masses. They have proclaimed it to be the truth and have invited the people towards it.

    There is a proverb in Arabic: ‘For everything that falls, there is one who will find it’. Everyone surely finds someone with whom one shares common ideas and thoughts. This is a brief answer to your Question. But I feel this will not satisfy you, hence I will have to elaborate on it. In today’s discussion I invite you to think and ponder on one point only. You must have read in the constitution of the Jamaat Islami this sentence from the pen of Janab Maududi Saheb:

    “No human should be made a ‘Measure of Truth’ besides Rasulullah Sallallehu alaihi we Sallam, no one should be regarded as free from ‘criticism’, no one should be engrossed in the ‘mental slavery’ of anyone. As Allah has shown, everyone should with a complete standard examine and inspect every person, and according to that measure, whatever grade befits a person, that person should be regarded as such”.
    In this constitutional belief, Janab Maududi Saheb has induced every member of the ‘Jamaat’ – whatever position one holds – not to think that any human Is above criticism besides Rasulullah Sallallahu alaihi wa Sallam, nor should one fall under the sway of another’s ‘mental slavery’, and with the examining powers that Allah Ta’aala has given Maududi Saheb and his ‘Jamaat’, everyone should be pecked at and examined. After attaining the results, whatever grade one attains should be conferred on that person. Now let us read from the ‘Maududi Mazhab’ and see that while criticizing, how Maududi Saheb has peeled and skinned the Salaf (pious predecessors). Listen, Maududi Saheb says that:

    1. The example of Moosa Alaihis salaam is of that hasty victorious commander, who marches forward without strengthening and estabilishing his authority, and behind him mutiny spreads in the conquered lands like wild fire in a jungle. (Maududi Mazhab, page 23)

    2. The danger of the highway robbery of a mischievous soul also confronts the Ambiyaa. An illustrious Prophet like Dawood Alaihis salaam was warned on an occasion that.”..and follow not desire that beguile thee from the way of Allah’. Surah Saad: 27 (Ibid page 21)

    3. Dawood Alaihis salaam became influenced with the customs of the Israeli society of his time and requested Orya to give a divorce. (Ibid page 24)

    4. Dawood Alaihis salam had a speck of carnal desire in his deeds. (Ibid Page 25)

    5. Human weaknesses overcame Nuh Alaihis salaam snd he became a prey to the passion of Jahiliyyah. (Ibid page 26)

    6. Actually Ismat (chastity) is not a requisite with the soul of the Ambiyaa. This is a Lateef (delicate) point. Allah Ta’aala had intentionally lifted His protection at some time or the other from every Nabi, so that one or two trangressions are committed, hence the people may not regard the Ambiyaa as gods, and will know that these are human too. (Ibid page 30)

    7. The Ambiyaa trangress too, they are even punished. (Ibid page 31)

    8. Younus Alaihis salaem committed a few deficiencies in the fulfilling of the Faraa’id of Risalat, and probably became impatient and left his position before time. (Ibid page 35)

    9. The Sahaabah were at times overcome with human shortcomings; they reviled one another (read the balance of this paragraph on page 56. I am ashamed of copying it further).

    10. The Sahaabah Kiraam many a time erred in understanding the original spirit of Jihaad fi Sabilillah. (Ibid page 59)

    11. Once a humble person like (Abubakr) Siddique Akbar who was immersed in Lillahiyyat (the way of Allah) erred (blundered) in fulfilling a delicate demand of islam.

    12. Personal greatness overcame and made Umar Radhiallahu Anhu helpless for a few moments at the time of the demise of Rasulullah Sallallahu alaihi wa Sallam. (Ibid page 60)

    13, Hazrat Uthman, on whom the burden of this great duty (of Khilafat) was placed, did not possess the qualifications that were granted to his noble predecessors. Therefore, Jahiliyyah found an inlet to creep into the social code of Islam. (Ibid page
    65)

    14. The verdicts of the Khulafaa Raashideen, which they issued as Qadis, did not become law in Islam. (Ibid page 66)

    15. Hadhrat Uthman, one after the other, appointed his relatives to high posts, and gave them other such concessions, which generally became a source of criticism among the people. (Ibid page 71)

    16. For example he bequeathed on Marwan one fifth (5 lakh Dinars) from the booty of Africa. (Ibid page 71)

    17. History reveals, and it truly shows, that Marwan and Yazeed are despised personalities among the Muslim Ummah. These are the softest words that could be said regarding Marwan and Yazeed. (Faraan monthly September 1976, page 42)

    18. These policies of Uthman Radhiallahu Anhu are without doubt, erroneous. A wrong will remain a wrong, irrespective of who commits it. To try and prove it correct by oratory or fabrications is not the demand of logic and justice, nor is it the requirement of the Deen, that an error of a Sahaabi should not be called an error. (Maududi Mazhab, page 73)

    19. One very despicable Bid’ah began during the reign of Hadhrat Mu’aawiyah, that he himself, and by his orders, all his governors, while delivering Khutbas on the minbars reviled Hadhrat Ali Radhiallahu Anhu. To revile and swear a person after his demise, forget the Shari’ah, it was against human etiquette to do so, and especially to soil the Jum’ah Khutbah with such filth is a very debased act according to the Deen and etiquette. (Ibid page 75)

    20. The effort of joining together (Istilhaaq) Ziyaad bin Simayyah are also among those acts of Hadhrat Mu’aawiyah Radhiallahu Anhu, wherein because of political reasons he contravened an accepted law of the Shari’ah. (Ibid page 76)

    21. Hadhrat Mu’aawiyah Radhiallahu Anhu in trying to make him (Ziyaad) his supporter and helper took evidence on the adultery of his father (Abu Sufyaan). And after concluding proof therof, made Ziyaad his (Abu Sufyaan’s) illegitimate son, and on that source made him his brother and a member of the family, This and in whatever manner it may be despised morally, is evident. But according to law, this is an illicit thing, because in the Shari’ah paternity is not proven from adultery. (Ibid page 77)

    22. Amr bin Al’aas committed two such acts, that there is no way out but to call it wrong. (Ibid page 84)

    23. Hadhrat Ali appointed Malik bin Haarith and Muhammad bin Abu- bakr as governors, whereas, these two people had a hand in the murder of Unman. This is known to everybody. During the entire reign of Ali Radhiallahu Anhu this is the only deed that it seems, cannot be called anything else but wrong. (Ibid page 85)

    24. Hadhrat Aysha Radhiallahu Anha and Hafsah Radhiallahu Anha became bold, and began to ’stretch their tongues’ in the presence of Rasulullah Sallallahu alaihi wa Sallam. (Ibid page 88)

    25. After studying History it is found that until now, no thorough Mujaddid was born. It was near that Umar bin Abdulaziz attained that position, but he was not successful. (Ibid page 91)

    26. In the reviews of Immam Ghazali, there are a few Ilmi and Fikri flaws, and that may be distributed into three portions. One type is those flaws, that resulted in his works due to the poor knowledge of Hadith, the second type from among those flaws is due to the Aqliyyah overpowering his mind and the third type from among these flaws is his leening towards Tasawwuf more than that which was necessary. (Ibid page 92)

    27. And we note this ‘Jahalah’ – with the exception of a very small Jamaat – among the general Muslims from East to West, be they from illiterate public; or graduate Ulama; or mendicant Mashaa’ikh; or graduates of colleges or universities. The thoughts, ways and manners of all these are different, but they are unanimous in not knowing the truth and soul of Islam. (Ibid page 19)

    I have presented a few drops from the enraged ocean of Janab Maududi Saheb’s criticism. All this, according to his own assertion, is written after examining by the ’standards’ shown by Allah. I do not wish to discuss or debate each point. Think for yourself that after all these criticism what picture is formed of Islam in the mind. Nevertheless, I feel that for your convenience a few basic points should be presented
    The instruction of Janab Maududi Saheb that besides Rasulullah Sallallahu alihi wa Sallam no human is above Tanqeed (criticism). Before thinking of its outcome, first ponder that what is Tanqeed (criticism)? (The Oxford dictionary says it is judging of merit; critical observation). Tanqeed is an Arabic word which means to gauge, assay, examine, inspect, test and to ascertain the truth from untruth. In the Urdu asuage it means to be catious, seize on trifling faults, reveal shortcomings: i.e. Tanqeed will mean that after examining a thing, an error is ascertained, then its weak precints are proclaimed. When we say that a certain person criticised someone, then nothing else will be understood besides that the weak points of the person criticised are brought to light. That person was examined and all faults and shortcomings were revealed.
    Whatever thing or person that is the centre of criticism, the first picture that comes to mind regarding that thing or person is that it or that person is not reliable, hence it or that person needs examining. Only after an examination could it be ascertained whether this thing or person is reliable, because that which is hundred percent reliable does not necessitate an examination. I am sure you have not yet seen a wise person in this world, who goes around examining reliable things. It is an accepted fact that, there is no necessity to test or inspect reliable things or personalities. Those things that are wothy of criticism, are not reliable. For example, regarding weights and measures that are stamped by the government and used in commerce, one will not find people while purchasing articles going around, asking merchants: “Mister, are these measures and weights used by you correct or not?”.

    After being stamped by the government these weights and measures are above criticism, and do not need any further examination. After all this, if one is found to do so, what shall be said of him?

    Now, when Maududi Saheb tells us that no human besides Rasulullah Sallallahu alaihi wa Sallam is above criticism, then, nothing else is meant, but, that save Rasulullah Sallallahu alaihi wa Sallam, no human is reliable before us. Janab Maududi Saheb labels this reliability as ‘mental slavery’, and that none should be influenced by the ‘mental slavery’ or any human besides that of Rasulullah Sallallahu alaihi waSallam.
    For this reason, according to his own picture of Islam, he has not granted the verdicts of the Khulafaa Raashideen as legally lawful, whereas, Rasulullah Sallallahu alaihi wa Sallam has in strong terms advised his Ummah to strongly hold onto the Sunnahs of the Khulafaa Raashideen. You must have read this Hadith in the Mishkaat Shareef:

    ‘Irbaad bin Saariyah Radhillahu Anhu reports: “Rasulullah Sallalla- hu alihi wa Sallam after leading the salaah, turned his face towards us, and delivered a very dynamic lecture, (as a result of which) tears flowed from the eyes, and hearts were moved. (Thereafter) a person said: “0 Messenger of Allah, this was like a farewell lecture, please advise us.” He said: “I advise you to fear Allah, and obey and accept (your leaders), even if he be a Habshi slave, because the one among you who will live after me, shall witness many discords. It is incumbent on you (to hold fast) onto my Sunnah and the Sunnah of the Guided Khulafaa Raashideen. Hold fast unto it, and keep it tight with the teeth. Beware and stay away from new (modern) ideas and acts. For every new act (that is thought to be a part of religion) is Bid’ah, and every Bid’ah (leads) astray”. (Musnad Ahmad, Abu Dawood, Tirmizi; Ibn Majah, Mishkaat page 29)

    Do you know that when one criticises another, what is meant by this? Listen, if the knowledge of a person is criticised (even if it is regarding one Mas’alah or an affair), it will mean that in this Mas’alah the opposite person’s view is incorrect, or the knowledge of the criticiser is superior. If the understanding of one is attacked, it will mean the criticiser’s understanding is superior. If the deeds of a person are attacked, it will mean that the deeds of the criticiser is of a higher standard. In short, for whatever reason the next person is criticised, it will mean that the knowledge, deeds, intelligence and understanding of the criticiser is superior.

    At times the criticiser is truly better than the opposite, but the criticiser in self vain imagination and aggrandisement regards himself to be superior. In Islam this is called ‘Kibr’ or ‘Takabbur’. This is the same ‘Kibr’ which overtook Iblis, and through this wrong self aggrandisement, instead of being a ‘Muallim Malakut’, he was cursed till the day of Qiyaamah. Now put these Usul (principles) before you, and ponder over the criticism, and the Usul of Maududi Saheb’s criticism. He gives every Tom, Dick and Harry the right to criticise everybody from among the Salf Saaliheen except Rasulullah Sallallahu alaihi wa Sallam. You tell me what would this be called? According to Maududi Saheb, does every member of his Jamaat have better knowledge and understanding than the Salaf Saaliheen? If not, then what else can his motive be besides self conceited imaginations and notions? When Maududi Saheb says that Younus Alaihis salaam committed a few errors in fulfilling the Risalat, at that time his claim would tantamount to this, that he understood the responsibilities of the Risalat more than Younus Alaihis salaam, and possibly (Nauzubillah) more than Allah, because the least, that is expected from Maududi Saheb is that he will not confer an important post In his Jamaat to someone that he knows will not diligently carry out the duties. But according to Maududi Saheb Allah Ta’aala conferred the Risalat on Younus Alaihis salaam and did not take this precaution. In like manner when he says that the passion of Jahiliyyah overcame Younus Alaihis salaam, then it is, as if he is claiming that his foresight on the passions of Jahiliyyah is greater than that of Younus Alaihis salaam, and that he has the strength to withstand the passions of Jahiliyyah.

    He says regarding himself:

    ‘It is Allah’s faith that I did not commit any deed or say any word under the influence of my passions, nor did I commit it. Every word that I uttered in my lectures, I measured each one of them before saying them, remembering that I would have to account for it before Allah and the creation. Therefore, I am assured in my position that I did not utter a word against Haq’. (Maududi Mazhab, page 29)

    When he says that Dawood Alaihis salaam was influenced by the customs of the Israeli society and committed certain acts, he forgets that the one that is captivated by the ‘mental slavery’ of one’s society can never be a Nabi. With all this, it gives one the impression that if Hazrat Maulana Abdul Aa’la Maududi was in the place of Dawood Alaihis salaam, he would never had asked 0rya to divorce his wife.

    When he says that in certain matters Hadhrat Mu’aawiyah Radhiallahu Anhu did not even take into consiaeration human morals, at that time he thinks of himself as a greater Aalim in human morality than Mu’aawiyah Radhiallahu Anhu. When he says that Mu’aawiyah Radhiallahu Anhu openly disobeyed a certain fundamental of the Shari’ah, at that time he presents himself as a greater Aalim of Shari’ah than Hadhrat Mu’aawiyah Radhiallahu Anhu.

    When he says that from the time of Umar bin Abdulaziz Rahmatullahi alaih till the time of Sayyid Ahmed Shahid Rahmatullahim, there was a shortcoming in the Tajdeedi missions of all the Mujaddids, at that time he tries to make believe that he understands Tajdeed and revival of the Deen more than all those pious elders. And when he very proudly claims this:

    ‘Instead of understanding the Deen from the present or previous personalities, I have always tried to understand it from the Qur’aan and Sunnah. Therefore, always when trying to know what the Deen of Allah wants from me and every Mu’min, I never try to see what certain Buzrugs have said, but rather, I try to see what the Qur’aan says and what Rasul says’.* (Maududi Mazhab, page 98)

    * [Who taught you the Quraan and Sunnah? People of the present or the past! The Angels of the Mala Aalaa? or like Ghulam Ahmed Qadiani, he came with it from the stomach of his mother? It is the height of ungratefullness. Those through the Barakah of whom a few correa or incorrect words were learnt, are being rejected and discarded. Fundamentally, these are the same viewpoints of Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiani and Ghulam Ahmed Parwez]

    He is actually trying to show to the people that in the long History of the Ummah there was not born anyone besides himself who understood the Deen. Well, this is a different subject, on which Insha’Allah, when time permits, I will say something. Briefly, I would say this, that the mo- tive of criticism is always that one feels ‘Ana khayrum minhu’ (I am better than him). It one is really superior to another in knowledge, understanding, deeds and morals, then verily one has the right to criticise another who has a lower standard. If one on his own accord feels superior, and if this is his motive, then every Mu’min should beseech Allah for His protection.

    Now in reality if Janaab Maududi Saheb is superior in knowledge, understanding, deeds, Taqwa etc than these whom he has criticised, then, without doubt he has the right to cirticise them, But if in comparison to these gentlemen, he really is lower, and has the urge to criticise, then what can his motive be besides high mindedness, arrogance, self-conceit and Takabbur?

    According to the viewpoint of Janab Maududi Saheb, when no individual of the 1400 year old Ummah is above criticism, nor can anyone be relied upon, and according to the standards shown by Allah, it is incumbent to examine every person, then this question arises, that the Deen that has reached the Ummah of today through the Naql Riwaayah, knowledge and deeds of the Salaf Saaliheen, could it be relied upon? Do you know that the proofs and arguments of our Deen are taken from four sources:

    (a) The Kitaab of Allah

    (b) The sunnah of Rasulullah Sallallahu alaihi wa Sallam

    © The Ijmaa of the Ummah

    (d) and the Qiyaas of the Mujtahideen.

    The Fiqhi Masaa’il of the A’immah Mujtahideen have been abrogated in such a manner, that Mashaa’Allah, Maududi himself is a Mujtahid Mutlaq. He is not in need of benefitting from any present or past tutor to understand the Deen. When the whole Ummah is in need of a critical examination and are thought to be unreliable, then it is clear that Ijmaa will be of no value. The dependance of the Kitaab and Sunnah are on Riwaayat and Diraayat, especially when according to the research of Janab Maududi Saheb the Sahaabah Kiraam Radhiallahu Anhum attacked one another and (Nauzubillah) called one another liars. If in reality, Nauzubillah, the Sahaabah Kiraam Radhiallahu Anhum were as pictured by the criticism of Maududi Saheb, then it is evident that the Ummah that will come after this will be even worse The result will be that beginning from the Qur’aan and Hadith till the Ijmaa and Qiyaas, everything will be doubtful and will be regarded as unreliable, until Maududi Saheb will show us through the standards shown to him by Allah, that how reliable a certain thing is and how unreliable others are. In all fairness, please tell us, what else besides this did Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiani and Mr. Ghulam Ahmed Parvez say? Where did Maududi Saheb attain this ‘Allah’s Standard’, in the light of which every individual from the Salaf Saaliheen have been examined and graded’ What! will Wahi again be revealed to him, or will he leap back fourteen hundred years and personally hear the Qur’aan and Sunnah from Rasulullah Sallallahu alaihi wa Sallam? When he does not accept the connections of any personality of the past or present, nor is he prepared to shoulder the ‘mental slavery’ of anyone, then from which cave will he receive the ‘Standards of Allah’?

    You may also know that Allah Ta’aala has taken upon Himself to safeguard this last Deen of ours till the Day of Qiyaamah. The Deen can only be safeguarded when the words of the Nusus of the Deen are preserved without any changes. Its meanings are also preserved. Then the manner in which Rasulullah Sallallahu alaihi wa Sallam had practised and demonstrated it himself, and how the Sahaabah Kiraam Radhialiahu Anhum practised these in his presence, should also be preserved Then through these deeds the proficiency in Islamic thought are pleasure; the path of Ihsaan; and the understanding of the Deen that is created, should also remain preserved. Briefly, four things are mentioned here: words, meanings, deeds and Islamic thought. We who are engrossed in ‘mental slavery’ do not think, but it is our belief that Allah Ta’aala has without any break or interruption preserved these four things, and we are indebted to those through whom these were preserved. They are our guides and leaders. We have complete reliance on them. We are their ‘mental slaves’, and we are thankful for their kindness and benevolence. If hypothetically these great personalities are removed from in between, and is thought that in a certain period of words, meanings, deeds and Islamic thought could not have been preserved, or it could not be relied upon, then, because of this, the entire structure of the Deen is being put into a negative light. But, according to the viewpoint of Maududi Saheb, not one of the four things mentioned remains credible, because the disgrace of being ‘mentally enslaved’ to the personalities of the past or present periods is totally unacceptable in his lofty court, nor will he accept in any way. Even if we give him the benefit of the doubt, that the words of the Qur’aan and Sunnah are preserved, then too the stages of interpre- ting the words and giving them their proper meanings, and through practising them, for one to reach the stage of Islamic thought, will yet have to be covered. Since Maududi Saheb does not accept the ‘mental slavery’ of any human, therefore he will have to traverse this whole path on his own, and in the same manner he will also have to cover the path through his own intellect and understanding. The result that will ensue and the picture that one will form of the Deen needs no comments. It is a fact that a person that wants to remain in the Deen of Muhammed Sallallahu alaihi wa Salam, will have to become a ‘mental slave’ of those Salaf Saaliheen who had upheld the Deen. The person that cannot withstand this ‘disgrace’ or does not want to follow it, cannot attain true Islam (The Islam brought by Muhammed Sallallahu alaihi wa Sallam), even if one reaches the highest of positions. After refuting the reliability of the sayings and conditions of the Salaf Saaliheen and not becoming engrossed in their ‘mental slavery’, if Janab Maududi Saheb has invented some scientific way, we will be looking forward to know about it, on condition that it is a bit different from the styles and modes of Mr. Parvez and Mirza Qadiani.
    I accept that Janab Maududi Saheb is a good author and has a flowing pen, but I feel that he in his lofty thoughts, sometimes uses such words that according to the situation are utterly out of context. For example, take the words ‘above criticism’ and ‘mental slavery’. These, according to their coherence are meaningless. Ponder, that if ‘mental slavery’ is not a shortcoming in the Islamic religion, but is a thing to be proud of a thousand times, then should one not be proud of following the path of the Salaf Saaliheen and those who have shouldered the burden of Islam? What shall be the meaning of this saying of Rasulullah Sallallahy alaihi wa Sallam.:
    ‘That my Ummah will never unite on falsehood’.
    Picture a child of the grades who went to Madrasah or school for the first time. The Ustaaz began teaching him the alphabets, and taught him that this is ‘Alif’ and that is “Ba’. In reply to this the pupil says: ‘Sir, I am a thinker of the fourteen century (or nineteen century AD.), why should I accept your ‘mental slavery’? It is apparent what type at education this ‘thinker’ will attain. We do not even hold this position in relation to the Sahaabah and Salaf Saaliheen, as the relation of the modern ‘thinker’ had with his Ustaaz. We learned the rudiments of Deen from these noble personalities. The result of the revolt against conforming to their ‘mental slavery’ is not different from that pupil who claimed to be a ‘thinker’. may Allah forgive me. I am of the opinion that those who severe their links from the Salaf Saaliheen, and throw off the yoke of their ‘mental slavery’, and are trying to map out a new path of Islam, in essence they do not acknowledge Islam, but repeatedly use the words of the Qur’aan and Sunnah, because there is no other way to spread their Kufr and disbelief among the Muslim public. I do not regard Janab Maududi Saheb among. them, but it is regretted that he has, by rejecting the ‘mental salvery’ of every personality among the Salaf Saaliheen, given preference to the ‘mental slavery’ of the orientalist western disbelievers, and he has adopted the ‘mentality of the free thinkers’ after whom the modernists of today are running.

    Janab Maududi Saheb has satirized and ridiculed the following of the path of the Salaf Saaliheen as ‘mental slavery’ which the Qur’aan proclaims as ‘Sabilul Mu’mineen’ (a way for the believers) and has warned those who disregard it of a severe punishment in Jahannam. This is the same ‘mental slavery’ that the Qur’aan describes as “As Siraatal Mustaqeem’ (The straight path), and instructs one to supplicate for its guidance. Also, this is the same ‘mental slavery’ for which the Muslims rub their noses five times a day and make du’aa. What a bad and distateful interpretaiton this is, that the path on which countless caravans of pious people have trodden, the following of whom is today labelled as ‘mental slavery’.
    If you have studied the emergence of all the false sects dunng the Islamic period, then this truth will dawn upon you that the foundation of all these sects are on “Ana wala ghayri” (Me and no one besides me) All these heve felt ashamed of the ‘mental slavery’ of the Salaf Saaliheen, and have floated their lofty thoughts in the jungles of their own intelligence and understanding. Thereafter, whichever way their heads rose their thoughts began to float in that way.

    The first fitnah in Islam was introduced by Abdullah bin Saba, a Jew, whose basic thinking was founded on that no one is above criticism besides the noble personality of Rasulullah Sallallahu alaihi wa Sallam. Then from the stomach of this Saba’iyyah the fitna of of the Khawaarij was born, who exclaimed aloud that Ali Radhiallahu Anhu and the other Sahaabah did not understand Islam “We understand more than them”. Then on the same basis the sects of Mu’tazilah, Murjiyyah, Qadriyyah, etc took root. Each one of them potrayed! the following of the Salaf as ‘mental slavery’. They went astray and led others astray. In our modern times the new sects that emerged, although their basis and viewpoints differ, you will find that they are more or less unanimous on the above point. It is fashionable today to satirize the Salaf Saaliheen; to extract worms from their deeds; injure their personalities; shoot arrows of criticism at them; and label their following as, revisionism, out moded, obsolete, orthodoxy, mental slavery, etc. etc It is sad that Janab Maududi Saheb has also based his ‘Islamic Movement’ on these lines. When we read the history of the Khawaarij, we were surprised at their boldness. They claimed to understand the Deen more than such a personality who had seen with his own eyes the Sun of Islam rise, and who had been an associate and confidant of Rasulullah Sallallahu alaihi wa Sallam during his 23 year period of Nubuwwat, who had eye witnessed every incident of the Nazule Wahi; who had spent his whole life from childhood till old age in the service of Islam. We fail to understand what has happened to their senses? They vehemently criticise his religious understanding. History repeats itself. Today the criticisms of Janaab Maududi Saheb (his attack on Uthman Radhiallahu Anhu and other Sahaabah) has removed our astonishment and surprise regarding the Khaarijis. Maududi Saheb tries to make us understand that Uthman Radhiallahu anhu was not able to upkeep the ‘Islamic system’, nor did anyone after him have the guidance and power to do so. Now Janab Maududi Saheb’s ‘Islamic movement will spear the Islamic System.
    ‘In hiya illa Khaarijiyyatun Jadidatun’ (Verily it is a new Khaariji order), even the angels of Allah are modest in presence of Uthman Radhiallahu Anhu.

    Rasulullah Salallahu alaihi wa Sallam says: ‘Should I not feel modest before that person, in the presence of whom the Malaa’ikah feel modest’ Muslim. (Mishkat page 56).

    Maududi Saheb does not feel a jerk by this, but showers licentious criticism on him. Rasulullah Sallallahu alaihi wa Sallam in recognising the great sacrifices of Uthman Radhiallahu Anhu says: ‘Whatever Uthman Radhiallahu Anhu does after this, there shall be no accusation upon him’ (Tirmizi, Mishkat)

    But Maududi Saheb feels it an honour to heap accusations on him
    Rasulullah Sallallahu alaihi wa Sallam advises the Ummah: ‘Fear Allah regarding my Sahaabah (companions), fear Allah regarding my Sahaabah. Do not make them a source of criticism after me. That person who has loved them, has loved them because they love me, and those who hate them, have hated them because they hate me’. (Tirmizi)
    But Maududi Saheb deems it important to criticise them by sifting them all through a sieve. It grants every Tom, Dick and Harry the right to criticise. By criticising them it instructs the Ummah to despise and hate them, so that people may keep away from becoming their ‘mental slaves’. This is the same Khaarijiyyah in a new colour, which surfaced during the time of Sahaabah It is stated in the Hadith that the ‘Later one’s among this Urnmah will curse its forebearers’.
    I end this letter, by mentioning the command of the Faqihul Ummah, Abdullah bin Mas’ud RadhiAllahu Anhu. You may compare the ’standard of truth’ between that of this great Sahaabi and that of Maududi Saheb.
    He says: ‘If you wish to follow anyone, then follow the path of those who have passed away, because one is not safe from the fitnah of a living person. I mean those who are among the Sahaabah of Muhammed Sallallahu alaihi wa Sallam. They were the best among this Ummah; they possessed the clearest of hearts; they attained the deepest of knowledge; and had the least formalities. Allah Ta’aala had chosen them as companions of His Nabi and to up- keep His Deen. Therefore, recognise their virtues, and follow their footsteps. As far as possible hold fast unto their characters and qualities, because they are on the straight path’. (Razeen)

  • Do read Khilafat o Malookiyat [original version and several issues of Tarjumnaul Quran] by Mawdudi Calamity again and differentiate between History and Tabbarrah. Mawdudi, his deviant books and his deviants followers of Jamat-e-Islami were thoroughly exposed by not ILLITERATE Barelvis but leading Deobandi and Wahabi Maulvis read the following books on Mawdudi’s Tabbarah on Sihaba Kiram and Prophets [PBUT].

    There is book written “Khilafat wa Malookiyat Ki Tareekhi Aur Shariee Haisiyat [Authenticity and Relity of Caliphat and Kingdom by Mawdudui] by Hafiz Salahuddin Yousuf [Editor of Weekly Eitisaam, Lahore Pakistan , he is a Salafi Scholar and if you get that book then please note that in preface following Deobandi and even Barelvi Scholar praised the above book on the refutation ofr Mawdudi’s Deviant and Blasphemic Beliefs regarding the Companions of Prophet Mohammad. You have already praised Deobandi Mullahs in one of your mail and following Mullahs [not ordinary Jahil Taliban] praised the book:

    1 – Mufti Muhammad Shafi Usmani [Deobandi]

    2 – Justice Taqi Usmani [Deobandi]

    3 – Maulana Ziauddin Islahi [Daar ul Musanifeen Azam Garh India]

    4 – Maulana Yousuf Ludhiyanvi [Binnori Town – Deobandi]

    5 – Maulana Ghulamullah Khan [Rawalpindi – Deobandi]

    6 – Dr Israr Ahmed [Former Deputy of Mawdudi]

    7 – Maulana Amee Ahsan Islahi [Former number 2 of Mawdudi]

    8 – Agha Shoorish Kashmiri [Noted Scholar and Journalist]

    9 – Maulana Manzoor Naimani [One of the founder of Jamat-e-Islami and Deobandi scholar and also refuted Mawdudi in his book on Islamic Revolution of Iran]

    10 – Safi ur Rahman Mubarakpuri [Author of Prophet Mohammad – PBUH’s biography Ar Raheeq Al Makhtoom and he is an Indian Scholar and a Salafi]

    11 – Yousuf Saleem Chishti [Deobandi Sufi Scholar]

    12 – Maulana Abul Hasan Nadvi [Former Head of Darul Ulomm Deoband and Member Board of Medina University Saudi Arabia]

    These are not some illiterate Deobandi Ulema:

    1 – Maulana Yousuf Ludhiyanvi – Binnori Town refuted Mawdudi.

    2 – Mawlana Yousuf Binnori – Founder of Binnori Town refuted Mawdudi

    3 – Mawlana Abdul Majid Daryabadi pupil of Ashraf Ali Thanwi refuted Mawdudi.

  • ایک ہی ہوں مسلم حرام کی پاسبانی کے لیہ
    نیل کے ساحل سے لے کر تابخا کے کاشغر تک “سب کافر ہیں

  • I hate these kind of kufr debates and promoting “Ikhtilafi Masael ” but molvies makes these issues to keep their presence in the society .
    What I believe that all religious non political ,non hatred groups which spread love and peace should get respect in the society .With all differences I appreciate Tablighi Jamaat which is non political and do not spread hatred ,Some Tablighi are influenced by New Deobandi / Taliban / jamati but as a whole This group have been peaceful .I think Tablighi Jamaat Is the largest religious group in the world with no political agenda .Secular groups should encourage them ,Religion is in our blood and will remain in our society ,Our job is to promote tolerance and Respect and keep mulla away from politics .

  • For Nawaz Sharif, chickens start coming home to roost:

    The federal government has accused the provincial government in Punjab, headed by Shahbaz Sharif, the opposition politician with the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) who has a reputation for being a strict administrator, of turning a blind eye to the growing influence of militant groups in Punjab. Mr Sharif, however, scoffed at the allegations and took exception to the term “Punjabi Taliban”, saying such statements reek of provincialism.

    PML-N officials have said the way to curb militancy is to bring such elements into the mainstream of the society instead of using force.

    In March, Rana Sanaullah, the provincial law minister and a senior leader of the PML-N, campaigned along with Maulana Muhammad Ahmad Ludhyanvi, the leader of the militant group Sipah-e-Sahaba, during a by-election in Jhang district of Punjab.

    Mr Sanaullah’s tacit support and endorsement of Sipah-e-Sahaba caused an uproar in the country and drew wide criticism.

    Pakistani analysts say the war of words, and the competing approaches to fighting militancy between the two rival officials, have political undertones as well. “At first blush, Mr Malik’s comments about the Punjabi Taliban are not very problematic or controversial. The term has been used for years now to refer to militant groups who cut their teeth in the Kashmir jihad before teaming up with other strains of militants and eventually turning their guns on the Pakistani state. But there is a political context here that Mr Malik ought to know much about”, read an editorial in Dawn, the country’s leading English daily, on Friday.

    “Perhaps the PML-N has seen in the latest comments by the interior minister a PPP plot to once again lay siege to the Punjab government, this time on grounds of law and order and security”, the editorial said.

    While the northern parts of Punjab province are relatively affluent and industrialised, poverty, unemployment and illiteracy is rampant in its southern districts.

    The local economy is dependent on agriculture, feudal social structures are strong and vast swathes of land are dotted with madrassas, which officials say are incubators for extremism.

    Sectarian groups such as Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan, a virulently anti-Shiite outfit; Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, a splinter group even more extreme in its views and violence; and Jaish-e-Muhammad have managed to operate despite a government ban on their activities in the southern Punjab.

    The banned militant groups are present not just in the far-flung areas of south Punjab, but in the urban centres as well.

    On Tuesday Sipah-e-Sahaba staged a rally in Aabpara, one of the main shopping centres of Islamabad, which falls under the purview of the federal government.

    More than a hundred madrassa students gathered at the main square of Aabpara, barely a kilometre from the headquarters of Inter-Services Intelligence, the country’s intelligence organisation.

    Holding flags, members of Sipah-e-Sahaba mounted loudspeakers on nearby traffic signals.

    One organiser ordered the students to stand in disciplined lines, urging them not to provoke police during the protest, which was meant to denounce the Israeli attack on the flotilla carrying aid for Gaza.

    Around a dozen police officers closed traffic in adjoining streets, as Haq Nawaz, a police inspector, quietly watched the proceedings from a distance. When asked if the protesting group was banned by the government, Mr Nawaz feigned ignorance. He said there were no orders to make any arrests.

    http://www.thenational.ae/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100610/FOREIGN/706099934/1002/FOREIGN

  • Farhan Q :
    With all differences I appreciate Tablighi Jamaat which is non political and do not spread hatred ,Some Tablighi are influenced by New Deobandi / Taliban / jamati but as a whole This group have been peaceful .I think Tablighi Jamaat Is the largest religious group in the world with no political agenda . Secular groups should encourage them ,Religion is in our blood and will remain in our society ,Our job is to promote tolerance and Respect and keep mulla away from politics .

    Dear Farhan,

    Posting these video was meant to show “Mirror” to these Jingoist Maulvis who are now sitting together for “Anarachy” whereas they don’t even offer Salat behind each other. Tablighi Jamat is the place where the Inventor [EX ISI GENERALS] of this Religious Anarchy in Pakistan, take sanctuaries. I say restrict every religious community/sect [everybody] within their Masjid, Imam Bargahs, Ahmedi Jamat Khana and Ismaili Jamat Khana and snatch Loudspeakers from them.

  • In the face of a barrage of criticism from many quarters, PML-N chief Nawaz Sharif has suddenly discovered that Ahmadis are equal citizens of Pakistan. Speaking recently in Lahore, he termed the community as ‘our brothers and sisters’ and asserted they should not be victimised.

    Till now, the PML-N had taken a rather ambiguous position on the whole matter. It was under the government of Shahbaz Sharif that the town of Rabwah near Chiniot, with its population of around 70,000 consisting mainly of Ahmadis, was re-named Chenab Nagar against the wishes of the community. No attempt was made under the PML-N government to prevent speakers at religious gatherings – some of them held in the immediate vicinity of Rabwah – attacking the Ahmadis.

    On the wider issue of extremism, while the PML-N has condemned terrorist attacks, it has been far more cautious in speaking out against the Taliban. Shahbaz Sharif’s curious labelling of the assertion that many such groups operated in the Punjab as an attack on Punjabis is another example of this ambiguity.

    The evidence that the PML-N may be changing its tone is good news. There have been meetings on a possible operation in the southern Punjab. This is badly needed. We must hope the matter is taken beyond rhetoric and leads to change. While Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa ranks as the province worst affected by militancy, the Punjab harbours a huge number of madrassas and has traditionally been all too hospitable to the sectarian groups that have sprung up in its towns. There is also another key difference. While the ANP, the party now in government in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, has openly spoken against the militants, the two factions of the PML that have held power in the Punjab over the past decade have been reluctant to do so.

    We must hope that the PML-N is willing to change its stance and this is followed through with consistency and does not change once the wave of pressure dissipates.

    Published in the Express Tribune, June 9th, 2010.
    http://tribune.com.pk/story/19762/changed-music/

  • Moderators,

    Very important post on Mawdudi’s Balsphemy against Prophets [PBUT] and Companions [May Allah be pleased with them] is stuck in “Spam Guard” – The letter was written by Maulana Yousuf Ludhiyanvi on Mawdudi and Jamat-e-Islami. Now these Munafiqs Deobandi and Jamati are sitting together to create lawlessness. Release the post.

  • Farhan Q :
    I appreciate Tablighi Jamaat which is non political and do not spread hatred ,Some Tablighi

    Go through Fazail-e-Aamal and you may find many Prophets [May Allah forbid] in their literature.

  • Tablighi
    Go through Fazail-e-Aamal and you may find many Prophets [May Allah forbid] in their literature.

    Its not the question who is right or wrong . We should have religious freedom ,Yes, in Fazail-e-Amal there are many weak ahades but does it contain hatred literature against other groups ? they guy who read Fazail Amal in Taleem every day got involve in terrorism , I never find any single hatred speech of any Tablighi Alim .

    I would appreciate any Sunni ,Shia ,Brelvi or any group as far as they are within the boundaries ,For me Religious is all about spirituality ,Good teachings can change the society.

  • Ahmedis are our brothers and sisters!
    These extremist beasts (moulvis) are the worst creatures under the sky!
    All peace loving Pakistanis, Moslems stand with you Mian Nawaz Sharif!! No matter what our political affiliations, we all fully support you for your show of solidarity with our Ahmedi Muslim Brothers and Sisters

  • No one can touch Nawaz Sharif. He is a Punjabi. He is the one who turned “Rabwa” into “Chenab Nagar”.

  • Omar Khattab : No one can touch Nawaz Sharif. He is a Punjabi. He is the one who turned “Rabwa” into “Chenab Nagar”.

    PML-N defends Nawaz’s remarks about Ahmadis By Amir Wasim Thursday, 10 Jun, 2010 http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/the-newspaper/front-page/pmln-defends-nawazs-remarks-about-ahmadis-060

    ISLAMABAD, June 9: The Pakistan Muslim League-N has rejected criticism of its leader Nawaz Sharif’s remarks about Ahmadis’ rights following the suicide bombings on two mosques in Lahore last month. Mr Sharif upset religious and political circles last week after he said that “Ahmadi brothers and sisters are an asset” of the country. The former prime minister said Ahmadis were citizens of Pakistan. Mr Sharif may have succeeded in pacifying leaders of the Ahmadi community and other minorities who have been criticising the Punjab government for its failure to provide them protection, but this provided an opportunity to his opponents to launch a campaign against him and his party.

    PML-N spokesman Ahsan Iqbal told Dawn that the criticism was “just an act of exploitation”. “Nawaz Sharif said what the Quaid-i-Azam had already stated that all Pakistanis were brothers irrespective of their religion, language or caste,” he added.
    Mr Sharif’s comments drew criticism from Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam, Jamaat-i-Islami, Wafaqul Madaris, Jamiat Ahl-i-Sunnat and Al-Hadith, Jamia Banuria and Khatm-i-Nabuwat Movement, Ulema and PML-Q. In a statement, leaders of Wafaqul Madaris, an umbrella organisation of over 20,000 Madressahs, urged Mr Sharif to retract his statement and advised him not to “defy religion for petty political gains”.

    JUI-F leaders termed the statement a “violation of the Constitution” as it had declared Ahmadis a minority community. “The PML-N chief should seek forgiveness from Muslims all over the world,” they said. Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi, the PML-Q leader, said Nawaz Sharif had issued the statement to “protect his properties in the UK”.
    The participants of a recent Ulema seminar condemned Mr Sharif’s remarks and termed it an attempt to appease the US. Some religious leaders have even threatened to launch a campaign against the PML-N if Mr Sharif does not withdraw his statement.

    Ahsan Iqbal criticised all those who were giving ‘religious colour’ to a statement which, according to him, had been issued in the ‘national perspective’. He said Mr Sharif had merely emphasised that every Pakistani citizen was entitled to equal respect and rights. Mr Iqbal was of the opinion that it was wrong to see the remarks in the religious context. He accused Pervaiz Elahi of exploiting the issue for political gains.

  • “QUOTE”

    Sayyid Abul A‘la Maudoodi
    His views bearing on the Ahmadiyya Movement http://www.ahmadiyya.org/movement/maudoodi/index.htm

    Maudoodi’s letter saying Lahore Ahmadiyya is a Muslim Group:

    Maudoodi wrote a letter in Urdu in his own hand, dated 23 Muharram 1357 A.H. (which would be about 25 March 1938), in which he wrote the words:

    “… the [Lahore] Ahmadi group is included within Islam … we cannot issue any fatwa against them on the basis of the Shari‘ah …”

    Note that Maudoodi uses the term Ahmadi to mean the Lahore Ahmadis, and the terms Qadiani and Qadianism to refer to the group then headed by Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmad from Qadian.

    Tarjuman-ul-Quran Darus Salaam (Pathankot) Punjab

    Dated: 23 Muharram 1357

    My respected and honoured,

    assalamu alaikum wa rahmatullah wa barakatuh

    I have been here for only one week. After my arrival here, the correspondence that Sayyid Muhammad Shah has shown me included three letters from you, and I confess that it was your letters that made the greatest impression upon me. The earlier replies from the Shah sahib to you still stand valid, but I myself wish to write a brief reply to the three letters.

    Regarding the views you have expressed about takfir, I have myself written much more about it earlier. As you have not seen the Tarjuman-ul-Quran before this, you are not fully aware of my views. If you had been reading this paper from the outset, then probably not only about takfir, but also regarding the other issues that you have mentioned, you would not have needed to ask anything and you would also have known what my policy is.

    From among the followers of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad sahib, I also do not consider Qadianis and Ahmadis to be in the same category. In my opinion the Qadiani group is excluded from Islam, but the Ahmadi group is included within Islam. However, I consider it inadvisable to co-operate with this group or to encourage them because after becoming Ahmadi a man becomes very close to Qadianism. There can only be two reasonable attitudes in the matter of Mirza sahib. If a man believes him to be true then he should accept him as a prophet because a true person’s claim to prophethood cannot be false. And if a man does not accept his claim to prophethood then it becomes obligatory for him, far from accepting him to be a mujaddid, not even to consider him as a gentleman because the person who is guilty of such a serious fabrication cannot be accorded any position of respect. The middle position taken by Ahmadis is untenable. When a man accepts someone as mujaddid and the Promised Mahdi, he would necessarily confirm his truth and honour him. Then when he finds in his unambiguous writings a claim to prophethood and to receiving revelation, he will not be able to take any position short of Qadianism. As to the educated people from among the Ahmadis who are adhering to this unreasonable position, we cannot issue any fatwa (ruling) against them on the basis of the Shari‘ah because they are denying the prophethood of Mirza. But we are bound to conclude either that they are adhering to their past errors and are guilty of obstinacy, or that they are denying the prophethood of Mirza with some reservation of mind, or lastly there is some flaw in their minds making them unable to realize the contradiction in their position. In any case, although we appreciate the work they are doing in support of Islam, we consider it the expedient policy not to encourage them because it is a path to assisting Qadianism.

    As to the wrong beliefs prevailing among the various sects and parties of the Muslims, I have my own opinion about almost each one of them. However, I have never expressed those opinions nor taken part in fighting against them because I consider it to be merely a waste of time. The defect in the branches is due to a defect in the root. To allow the root to remain in the same condition while devoting effort to reforming the branches is foolishness. If we are to do something for the Muslims then we must devote all efforts to removing the weaknesses in the foundations. Then, Allah willing, the branches will by themselves become good.

    Maudoodi in his statement said that: “… the [Lahore] Ahmadi group is included within Islam … we cannot issue any fatwa against them on the basis of the Shari‘ah …”. It means that according to Maudoodi, writing in 1938, the Lahore Ahmadis cannot be expelled from the Muslim community by means of any law based on Islam, and they are in fact included within Muslims. Whatever he thinks of the rightness or wrongness of our beliefs, whether he considers Lahore Ahmadis to be bad, obstinate and unreasonable, whatever dangers he perceives from our beliefs, all that is an entirely separate issue. What we are pointing out is that according to the view Maudoodi has expressed here, in terms of Islamic Shari‘ah the Lahore Ahmadis are Muslims and cannot be declared as non-Muslim.

    “UNQUOTE”

  • Scanned image of Maudoodi’s letter saying Lahore Ahmadiyya is a Muslim Group

    Page 1 (of 4) of the letter

    (You can see that he has crossed out his old address, Hyderabad Deccan, on the printed letter head and written in Darus Salaam, Pathankot, Punjab in its place.) http://www.ahmadiyya.org/movement/maudoodi/letter-scan.htm

    The translation:

    Note that Maudoodi uses the term Ahmadi to mean the Lahore Ahmadis, and the terms Qadiani and Qadianism to refer to the group then headed by Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmad from Qadian.

    Tarjuman-ul-Quran
    Darus Salaam (Pathankot)
    Punjab

    Dated: 23 Muharram 1357

    My respected and honoured,

    assalamu alaikum wa rahmatullah wa barakatuh

    I have been here for only one week. After my arrival here, the correspondence that Sayyid Muhammad Shah has shown me included three letters from you, and I confess that it was your letters that made the greatest impression upon me. The earlier replies from the Shah sahib to you still stand valid, but I myself wish to write a brief reply to the three letters.

    Regarding the views you have expressed about takfir, I have myself written much more about it earlier. As you have not seen the Tarjuman-ul-Quran before this, you are not fully aware of my views. If you had been reading this paper from the outset, then probably not only about takfir, but also regarding the other issues that you have mentioned, you would not have needed to ask anything and you would also have known what my policy is.

    From among the followers of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad sahib, I also do not consider Qadianis and Ahmadis to be in the same category. In my opinion the Qadiani group is excluded from Islam, but the Ahmadi group is included within Islam. However, I consider it inadvisable to co-operate with this group or to encourage them because after becoming Ahmadi a man becomes very close to Qadianism. There can only be two reasonable attitudes in the matter of Mirza sahib. If a man believes him to be true then he should accept him as a prophet because a true person’s claim to prophethood cannot be false. And if a man does not accept his claim to prophethood then it becomes obligatory for him, far from accepting him to be a mujaddid, not even to consider him as a gentleman because the person who is guilty of such a serious fabrication cannot be accorded any position of respect. The middle position taken by Ahmadis is untenable. When a man accepts someone as mujaddid and the Promised Mahdi, he would necessarily confirm his truth and honour him. Then when he finds in his unambiguous writings a claim to prophethood and to receiving revelation, he will not be able to take any position short of Qadianism. As to the educated people from among the Ahmadis who are adhering to this unreasonable position, we cannot issue any fatwa (ruling) against them on the basis of the Shari‘ah because they are denying the prophethood of Mirza. But we are bound to conclude either that they are adhering to their past errors and are guilty of obstinacy, or that they are denying the prophethood of Mirza with some reservation of mind, or lastly there is some flaw in their minds making them unable to realize the contradiction in their position. In any case, although we appreciate the work they are doing in support of Islam, we consider it the expedient policy not to encourage them because it is a path to assisting Qadianism.

    As to the wrong beliefs prevailing among the various sects and parties of the Muslims, I have my own opinion about almost each one of them. However, I have never expressed those opinions nor taken part in fighting against them because I consider it to be merely a waste of time. The defect in the branches is due to a defect in the root. To allow the root to remain in the same condition while devoting effort to reforming the branches is foolishness. If we are to do something for the Muslims then we must devote all efforts to removing the weaknesses in the foundations. Then, Allah willing, the branches will by themselves become good.

    Why have we quoted this opinion of Maudoodi?

    We are citing this opinion of Maudoodi in our support because of his statement that: “… the [Lahore] Ahmadi group is included within Islam … we cannot issue any fatwa against them on the basis of the Shari‘ah …”. It means that according to Maudoodi, writing in 1938, the Lahore Ahmadis cannot be expelled from the Muslim community by means of any law based on Islam, and they are in fact included within Muslims. Whatever he thinks of the rightness or wrongness of our beliefs, whether he considers Lahore Ahmadis to be bad, obstinate and unreasonable, whatever dangers he perceives from our beliefs, all that is an entirely separate issue. What we are pointing out is that according to the view Maudoodi has expressed here, in terms of Islamic Shari‘ah the Lahore Ahmadis are Muslims and cannot be declared as non-Muslim.

    The Urdu text of the above section of Maudoodi’s letter, in printed format, is given below: http://www.ahmadiyya.org/movement/maudoodi/letter.htm#eng

  • Before condemning Mullahs, I think LUBP should condemn Mr. Bhutto and his Pakistan People Party. Because they were the guys who did 2nd amendment in 1974. How can I accept that leader like Bhutto were in Mullah’s pressure.
    Being a Muslim how can you guys accept that any one can who claims to prophet hood and follow such lier can be remain Muslim.
    You guys are going against the philosophy of Mr. Bhutto. He was a Muslim Socialist and you guys are Secular Capatalist

  • @Kashif Naseer To put your comment into some context, I had to visit your own website.

    It did not take me more than one minute to see that you are a typical Jamaatia, a human looking creature with an ugly beast inside.

    Did you write this gem?

    مجھے ملامت کرنے میں جلدی نہ کیجئے گا اگر میں یہ کہوں کہ جمعہ کو قادیانیوں کے مراکز میں ہوئے فدائی حملے کی خبر سن کر میرے وجود میں انبساط کی لہر ڈور گئی ہے اور مجھے ایک گونا اطمینان حاصل ہوا۔

    ایک انسان کی جان تو بہت بڑی بات ہے اگر میں کسی جانور کو بھی مرتا دیکھ لوتو میری نیندیں اڑ جاتی اور حلق سے کچھ نہیں اترتا۔ لیکن آخر کیا بات ہے کہ خون میں لتھڑے ہوئے یہ قادیانی، انکی عورتوں کا گریہ و ماتم، انکے گھروں میں رکھے جواں لاشے، انکے چہرے پر خوف اور وحشت کی جھلک اور انکی بے بسی میرے لئے اس درد کا درمہ بن گئی ہے جس کی شدت سے میں کئی سالوں رو رہا ہوں۔ اس سوال کا جواب ہر وہ شخص دے سکتا ہے جسے قادیانی فتنہ سے کچھ اگاہی ہو، اس مکار کمیونٹی کے طریقہ واردات کا کچھ ادراک ہو۔

    اس میں کوئی شبہ نہیں کہ مجھے سخت افسوس ہوتا اور میں پر زور مزمت کرتا، اگر خدانا خواستہ اس ہی نوح کا کوئی حملہ کسی دوسری غیر مسلم اقلیت کے ساتھ رونما ہوتا۔

    http://smkashif.blog.com/2010/05/29/%DA%A9%DB%8C%D8%A7-%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%A6%DB%8C-%D8%A8%DB%92-%DA%AF%D9%86%D8%A7%DB%81-%DB%81%DB%8C%DA%BA/

    Shame on you. You are a shame on humanity. You are a shame on Islam.

  • مولویوں کی زبان چھین لیں اور تم لوگوں کو چھٹی دے دیں، خدا کا خوف کرو۔

    تم لوگ بھٹو کے نا ہوسکے تو کسی اور کے کیا ہوگے۔ وہ سوشلسٹ مسلمان تھا اور تم لوگ سیکولر کیپیٹلسٹ، مادہ پرست، حوس کے بجاری، کرپشن اور لوٹ مار کے امین۔ خدا کا خوف کرو کبھی مرنا بھی یا ہمیشہ زندا رہنے کے لئے آئے ہو۔

    کبھی آمریکی، اسرئیلی اور ہندوستانی دہشت گردی نظر آئی۔ نہیں نا آئے گی بھی نہیں۔ شرم کرو بھٹو امت کو جڑ رہا تھا اور تم لوگ پیسے اور مال!

  • بے گناہ احمدیوں کے قتل پر خوش ہونے والے انسان نما درندے، ملا عمر اور منور حسن کے پجاری اب ہمیں بھتو سے محبت کا سبق پڑھانے آ ے ہیں

    پاسبان مل گئے کعبے کو صنم خانے سے ؟

    خدا کے خوف کا سبق پڑھاتے ہو؟

    اور بے گناہ نماز جمعہ کے شہیدوں کے قتل پر خوشی مناتے ہو؟

    منافق ہو تم منافق، عبدللہ ابن ابی کا نام سنا ہے؟ اسی کے پروکار ہو تم – خارجی مللاؤں کا شہکار ہو تم

  • پہلی بات یہ ہے کہ نماز “جمعہ”، “نمازیوں” اور “شہیدوں” کی اصطلاح استمال کرکے آپ پاکستان کے قانون کا مزاق اڑا رہی ہیں۔
    دوسری بات یہ ہے کہ آپ کو کس نے کہ دیا کہ احمدی بےگناہ ہیں۔
    کیا روح زمین پر اس سے بڑا کوئی گناہ ہوگا کہ محمد صلی اللہ و علیہ وسلم کے بعد کسی شخص کو نبی مانا جائے۔
    لیکن اگر آپ خود احمدی ہیں تو آپ ایسا سوچ سکتیں ہیں۔

  • شاید آپ کو نہیں پتا کہ منافق وہ ہوتا ہے جو اپنے عقیدے کو چھپا کر رکھے، لوگوں کو دھوکہ دے۔ الحمد اللہ میں نے کبھی اپنے عقیدے کو نہیں چھپایا اس لئے آپ ایسا نہیں کہ سکتیں۔ رہی بات میرے خوش ہونے کی تو یہ مرا اور میرے اللہ کا معاملا ہے۔ یہ حملے میں نے نہیں کئے یا کروائے جو مجھے کوئی مسلہ ہو۔ اور ہاں مجھے کوئی پارسائی کا دعوا نہیں میں ایک گناہگاہ مسلمان ہوں اور مجھ سے غلطیاں ہوتی رہتی ہیں۔ لیکن مجھے اپنی کوتاہی کا ادراک ہوتا ہے تو میں رجعوع اور استغفار کرتا ہوں۔۔۔

  • نہیں میں احمدی نہیں ہوں – لیکن میں ہر اس شخص اور گروہ کے مخالف ہوں جو اپنا عقیدہ دوسروں پر تھوپنا چاہے –

    اختلاف عقائد کی بنیاد پر کسی بے گناہ شخص کے قتل پر خوش ہونا توہین اسلام ہے اور توہین انسانیت – لیکن خارجی روحیں اس بات کو نہیں سمجھیں گی

  • انکی عبادت کو “نماز جمعہ”، انکے مقتولین کو “شہید” اور انکی عبادت گاہوں کو “مسجد” آپ ہرگز نہ کہتیں اگر آپ کو انکے فتنہ کا اگر زرا سا بھی ادراک ہوتا۔
    دوسری بات یہ کہ میں نے اپنا عقیدہ دوسروں پر نہیں تھوپا۔ میں نے کبھی ایسا نہیں کیا اور میں ڈائیلاگ پر یقین رکھتا ہوں۔ البتہ مجھے خوشی ہوئی لیکن میں نے کسی سے نہیں کہ میرے ساتھ وہ بھی خوش ہو۔
    میں عقل کل نہیں ہوں، میں غلط ہوسکتا ہوں۔ لیکن آپ کو بھی چاہئے کہ آپ بھی اسلام اور قادیانیت کا مطالعہ کریں۔

  • I appreciate that you the believe in dialogue.

    Let us look at some other “fitnas”, i.e., other than Ahmadis. What do you think about the Shia fitna, Deobandi fitna, Barelvi fitna and Wahhabi fitna? Also Agha Khani and Bohri fitna etc etc

  • خارجی کون تھے شاید آپ کو یہ بھی نہیں پتا۔ اگر آپ اس دور میں ہوتی تو آپ خارجیوں، فتنہ مسلمہ کزاب اور بنو قریضہ (یہودی قبیلے) کے ساتھ کئے گئے سلوک پر بھی بہت دکھ ہوتا اور آپ صحابیوں کے لئے وہی زبان استمعال کررہی ہیں۔
    ہاں سارے مولوی پارسا نہیں، جتنا ہمارا معاشرا کرپٹ ہے اتنا ہی وہ لوگ بھی، لیکن اگر آپ کا مقصد دین سیکھنا ہو تو آپ کو اچھا مولوی بھی مل سکتا ہے۔

  • ” اگر آپ کا مقصد دین سیکھنا ہو تو آپ کو اچھا مولوی بھی مل سکتا ہے۔”

    مثال کے طور پر کون؟

    براہ راست جواب

  • آغاخانیوں، بوہریوں اور وہابیوں میں کوئی ایسا نہیں جس نے نبوت کا دعوا کیا ہو.ہو۔ ان تمام لوگوں سے اختلافات اپنی جگہ لیکن کوئی بھی صلح جو اور صاحب علم مولوی کبھی بھی ان پر تکفیر بازی نہیں کرتا۔ش پھر امت کے درمیان انکے کفر پر کوئی اتفاق نہیں۔
    قادیانیوں کا مسلہ مختلف ہے وہ ختم نبوت کے منکر ہیں۔ 1400 سے امت ختم نبوت اور اسکے اجزاء پر متفق رہی ہے آج ایسا نہیں ہوسکتا کہ کوئی اس تامل کو توڑے اور پھر بھی خود کو مسلمان کہے۔ کیا مان سکتیں ہیں کہ محمد صلی اللہ صلیہ وسلم کے بعد بھی کوئی شخص نبی ہوسکتا ہے? میں کیسے مان لوں کے کوئی ختم نبوت والی آیت کو نہ مانے اور کہے کہ میں قرآن پر ایمان لاتا ہوں۔

  • اسکے لئے آپ کو خود محنت کرنی پڑے گی۔ جس طرح دنیا کے بغیر محنت کے نہیں ہوتے اس طرح بغیر محنت کے کیسے آجائے گا۔ امام غزالی رحمہ اللہ جب تعلیم ہوئے تو روحانی تعلق کے لئے کسی شیخ سے تعلق کی سوجی، چار سال کی محنت اور دنیا بھر کے سفر کے بعد انکا دل ایک شیخ سے متاثر ہو۔

  • اسکے لئے آپ کو خود محنت کرنی پڑے گی۔ جس طرح دنیا کے کام بغیر محنت کے مکمل نہیں ہوتے اس طرح بغیر محنت کے دین کیسے آجائے گا۔ امام غزالی رحمہ اللہ جب تعلیم ہوئے تو انکو روحانی تعلق کے لئے کسی شیخ سے تعلق کی سوجی، چار سال کی محنت اور دنیا بھر کے سفر کے بعد انکا دل ایک شیخ سے متاثر ہو۔

  • صلح جو اور صاحب علم مولوی کی تعریف کیا ہے ؟ پاکستان اور ہندوستان کے موجودہ حضرت میں سے کون اس تعریف پر پورا اترتا ہے ؟

  • @Kashif Naseer I knew you will hesitate mentioning the names of your “shaikhs”, i.e. Shaikh Mullah Omar, Shaikh Munawar Hassan, Shaikh Rafi Usmani, Shaikh Osama bin Laden, Shaikh Sami-ul-Haq.

  • دین کی سچی تڑپ پیدا ہو تو ایسے لوگ مل جاتے ہیں۔ ہندوستان پاکستان بھی ایسے علماء سے خالی نہیں ہے۔ بہت سو کو میں جانتا ہوں لیکن شاید آپکو نامی گرامی نام چاہئیں۔ تو مشہور علماء میں میرے خیال سے شیخ احمد دیدات، ڈاکڑ اسرار احمد، ڈاکڑ زاکر نائیک، ڈاکڑ غلام ملک مرتضی، مفتی تقی عثمانی، مفتی رفیع عثمانی، جناب واصف منظور، حافظ ابتشام اللہ، مفتی منیب الرحمان وغیرا ایسے علماء کی فہرست میں شمار کئے جاسکتے ہیں۔

  • Aamir Mughal bhai may wish to comment on these names.

    Some of these names I am sure are notorious for their narrow minded, pro-violence, and sectarian tendencies. They are neither sulah-ju, nor sahib-e-ilm.

    I am stepping out to attend to some urgent business. I hope someone else at LUBP may wish to respond to your further queries.

  • ملا عمر اور اسامہ لادن کے بارے مجھے زیادہ علم نہیں ہے۔ جو کچھ جانتا ہوں وہ میڈیا پر لگائے جانے والے الزامات اور کہانیاں ہیں جن کی۔ اب خدا جانے اس میں کتنا شچ اور کتنا جھوٹ ہے۔
    آپ سے اس گفتگو پر خوشی ہوئی۔ آپ نے میری باتوں سے سنا اور جواب دئے اسکے لئے شکریا۔ اب میں مزید تبصرہ کرنے یا جواب دینے سے وقت کی کمی اور کچھ ضروری کام کی وجہ سے قاصر ہون۔ انشاء اللہ پھر کبھی کسی اور فورم پر ۔۔۔۔۔۔ فی امان اللہ

  • ملا عمر اور اسامہ کے بارے میں اپ کو صرف اخباروں ہی سے ملا ،پر اپ دل سے انھیں اپنا امیر اور رہنما کیوں مانتے ہیں ؟ کیوں سارے ملا ،حمید گل ،عمران خان ،منور حسن ،مفتی وغیرہ انھیں بری عزت دیتے ہیں ،کیوں ڈاکٹر اسرار ملا عمر کی حکومت کو اسلامی مانتے تھے ؟ وہ تو سب اخباری باتیں تھی نہ ؟
    ——————–
    آپ نے اچھےعلما کیا بات کی ،یہ باتیں دیوبند انڈیا کے المع نے دہشتگردی کے خلاف کونفرنس بھی کی اور بری قوت سے دہشتگردی کے خلاف بھی بولتے ہیں ، ان کے خلاف فتوے بھی دیتے ہیں ،کشمیر کے جہادیوں کو فسادی کہتے ہیں ،پر کیا وجہ ہے کے پاکستان کے علما خاموش ہیں ؟ کیا سرحد پر شریعت کچھ ہو جاتی ہے ؟
    ہمارا اسلام آئ ایس ائی کے ماتحت تو نہیں ؟ ہمارے حلال حرام اب فوجی جنرل اور عرب جہادی طےکرتے ہیں دیوبند مفتی نہیں

  • Quoting one of my learned friends !!!

    “” Fail to understand what sort of logic our so called religious scholars are pursuing here. Are they implying that Ahmedis have killed more than 84 of their own people to get the 1974 and 1984 amendment repealed in constitution? I pray that our religious scholars wake up from their deep slumber before every person in Pakistan is labeled kafir because of the hate they preach in mosques and teach in madaressahs.

    Why our government is still reluctant to take note of these hate mongers? The local press, particularly Urdu press, is strewn with all kind of hate articles against Ahmedis, and government is keeping mum. It’s high time that the saner elements of the society to raise their voice against the injustice being meted out to the hapless Ahmedis, before they become victims of this religious bigotry themselves.”””

  • Our legendary intellectual Saeen Bulleh Shah said,
    Tenion “Kafir”, “Kafir” Akhde
    Teou “Aho”, “Aho” Akh
    They repeatedly declared you, “Infidel””,
    You go on repeating “yes”, “yes”
    Mullah Te Mashalichi Dohi Aiko Chit
    Loka Kerde Channna AApi Anhere Nit
    Prayer leader and torch bearers, both are alike
    They provide light to people, them self remain in dark.
    Saeeen Bulleh Shah lashes all sort of hypocrites but the Mullahs(who represent bigotry and fundamentalism), the Mufties and Qazis(who represent corrupt judiciary and narrowness of the righteous) are the special targets of his thought provoking and satirical verses. For instance
    Parh Parh Nafal Namaz Guzaarein
    Uchian Baanghaan Changanhan Maarein
    Menbar Charh Kay Waaz Pukaarein
    Teinnoon Keeta Hirs Khawar
    You offer prayers, even additional prayers
    You cry hoarse to call for prayers (and hide your hypocrisy)
    You mount the pulpit and give sermons(merely for money)
    Lust has humiliated and ruined you.

  • Kashif Naseer :
    دین کی سچی تڑپ پیدا ہو تو ایسے لوگ مل جاتے ہیں۔ ہندوستان پاکستان بھی ایسے علماء سے خالی نہیں ہے۔ بہت سو کو میں جانتا ہوں لیکن شاید آپکو نامی گرامی نام چاہئیں۔ تو مشہور علماء میں میرے خیال سے شیخ احمد دیدات، ڈاکڑ اسرار احمد، ڈاکڑ زاکر نائیک، ڈاکڑ غلام ملک مرتضی، مفتی تقی عثمانی، مفتی رفیع عثمانی، جناب واصف منظور، حافظ ابتشام اللہ، مفتی منیب الرحمان وغیرا ایسے علماء کی فہرست میں شمار کئے جاسکتے ہیں۔

    There is Fatwa against Usmani Brothers and their Alleged Islamic Bank which was issued by Jamia Farooqia and signed by 30 Scholars.

  • Kashif Naseer :
    اسکے لئے آپ کو خود محنت کرنی پڑے گی۔ جس طرح دنیا کے بغیر محنت کے نہیں ہوتے اس طرح بغیر محنت کے کیسے آجائے گا۔ امام غزالی رحمہ اللہ جب تعلیم ہوئے تو روحانی تعلق کے لئے کسی شیخ سے تعلق کی سوجی، چار سال کی محنت اور دنیا بھر کے سفر کے بعد انکا دل ایک شیخ سے متاثر ہو۔

    Do you even know that Ghazali complied his Magnum Opus “Ahya Uloom” with all kind of False and Fabricated Hadiths.

  • Kashif Naseer :
    آغاخانیوں، بوہریوں اور وہابیوں میں کوئی ایسا نہیں جس نے نبوت کا دعوا کیا ہو.ہو۔ ان تمام لوگوں سے اختلافات اپنی جگہ لیکن کوئی بھی صلح جو اور صاحب علم مولوی کبھی بھی ان پر تکفیر بازی نہیں کرتا۔ش پھر امت کے درمیان انکے کفر پر کوئی اتفاق نہیں۔
    قادیانیوں کا مسلہ مختلف ہے وہ ختم نبوت کے منکر ہیں۔ 1400 سے امت ختم نبوت اور اسکے اجزاء پر متفق رہی ہے آج ایسا نہیں ہوسکتا کہ کوئی اس تامل کو توڑے اور پھر بھی خود کو مسلمان کہے۔ کیا مان سکتیں ہیں کہ محمد صلی اللہ صلیہ وسلم کے بعد بھی کوئی شخص نبی ہوسکتا ہے? میں کیسے مان لوں کے کوئی ختم نبوت والی آیت کو نہ مانے اور کہے کہ میں قرآن پر ایمان لاتا ہوں۔

    What a Fun! You have pleaced WAHABIS [Kalima Reciting Muslims] with Innovative Sects like Aga Khani [even sect like Shia consider Aga Khani Kaafir].

  • Kashif Naseer :
    خارجی کون تھے شاید آپ کو یہ بھی نہیں پتا۔ اگر آپ اس دور میں ہوتی تو آپ خارجیوں، فتنہ مسلمہ کزاب اور بنو قریضہ (یہودی قبیلے) کے ساتھ کئے گئے سلوک پر بھی بہت دکھ ہوتا اور آپ صحابیوں کے لئے وہی زبان استمعال کررہی ہیں۔ ہاں سارے مولوی پارسا نہیں، جتنا ہمارا معاشرا کرپٹ ہے اتنا ہی وہ لوگ بھی، لیکن اگر آپ کا مقصد دین سیکھنا ہو تو آپ کو اچھا مولوی بھی مل سکتا ہے۔

    No we don’t know? Please explain who were Kharijites?

  • Kashif Naseer :
    مولویوں کی زبان چھین لیں اور تم لوگوں کو چھٹی دے دیں، خدا کا خوف کرو۔
    تم لوگ بھٹو کے نا ہوسکے تو کسی اور کے کیا ہوگے۔ وہ سوشلسٹ مسلمان تھا اور تم لوگ سیکولر کیپیٹلسٹ، مادہ پرست، حوس کے بجاری، کرپشن اور لوٹ مار کے امین۔ خدا کا خوف کرو کبھی مرنا بھی یا ہمیشہ زندا رہنے کے لئے آئے ہو۔
    کبھی آمریکی، اسرئیلی اور ہندوستانی دہشت گردی نظر آئی۔ نہیں نا آئے گی بھی نہیں۔ شرم کرو بھٹو امت کو جڑ رہا تھا اور تم لوگ پیسے اور مال!

    What happened with Rafizi Bhutto was good.

  • Kashif Naseer :
    مولویوں کی زبان چھین لیں اور تم لوگوں کو چھٹی دے دیں، خدا کا خوف کرو۔

    Who said that “Mawlvis are free to do whatever they like” a glimpse:

    People say that there is dearth of Electricity in Pakistan – No more load shedding – Deobandi Power Generators/Deobandi Rental Power Plant. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nar2Q17jI4o&feature=related

    MTV CLASSICS OR DEOBANDI MUSIC BOX http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrrPkL8wo14

  • A couple of overseas PPP guys are also complaining about Nawaz Sharif’s stance;

    نواز شریف اپنے بیان پر قوم سے معافی مانگیں، خواجہ کلیم الرحمن
    مانچسٹر (پ ر) پیپلز پارٹی گریٹر مانچسٹر کے صدر خواجہ کلیم الرحمن نے کہا ہے کہ شریف برادران دو کشتیوں کے مسافر ہیں۔ شہید ذوالفقار علی بھٹو نے احمدیوں کو اقلیت قرار دیا جبکہ میاں نواز شریف نے انہیں بھائی بنالیا۔ ان کے بیان سے پوری قوم کی دل آزاری ہوئی انہوں نے کہا کہ نواز شریف اقتدار کے حصول کے لئے کچھ بھی کرسکتے ہیں۔ انہیں پوری قوم اور امت مسلمہ سے معافی مانگنی چاہئے۔
    —-
    احمدی مسلمانوں کے بھائی نہیں ہیں، تنویر گیلانی کی نواز شریف کے بیان پر تنقید
    گلاسگو (نمائندہ جنگ) پیپلز پارٹی سکاٹ لینڈ کے جنرل سیکرٹری سید تنویر گیلانی نے نواز شریف کے اس بیان پر شدید تنقید کی ہے، جس میں انہوں نے احمدیوں کو اپنا بہن بھائی قرار دیا ہے۔ سید تنویر گیلانی نے کہا کہ احمدی غیرمسلم ہیں اور ایک مسلم ریاست اپنے غیرمسلم شہریوں کی حفاظت کی پوری طرح ذمہ داری ہے۔ احمدیوں کا قتل ایک سفاکانہ عمل تھا، جس کی ہم پوری مذمت کرتے ہیں۔ ان کے خلاف کسی بھی قسم کی دہشت گردی یا ان کی عبادت گاہوں پر حملہ قطعی طور پر ناقابل قبول ہے، لیکن اسلامی طور پر احمدی مسلمانوں کے دینی بھائی نہیں۔ پاکستان کے آئین میں بھی ان کو غیرمسلم قرار دیا گیا ہے۔

  • Kashif Naseer : اسکے لئے آپ کو خود محنت کرنی پڑے گی۔ جس طرح دنیا کے بغیر محنت کے نہیں ہوتے اس طرح بغیر محنت کے کیسے آجائے گا۔ امام غزالی رحمہ اللہ جب تعلیم ہوئے تو روحانی تعلق کے لئے کسی شیخ سے تعلق کی سوجی، چار سال کی محنت اور دنیا بھر کے سفر کے بعد انکا دل ایک شیخ سے متاثر ہو۔

    REAL FACE OF IMAM GHAZALI AND HIS BLASPHEMOUS COMMENT. HIS BOOK AHYA UL ULOOM IS FULL OF SUCH BLASPHEMOUS COMMENT:

    “QUOTE”

    “La Ilaha Ill Allah is the Kalema of the jahileen” (Imam Ghazali, Mishkatul Anwar p.25).

    In the night of Meraj (Ascension), Imam Ghazali rebuked Prophet Moses. Prophet Mohammad said, “Respect him O’ Ghazali!” (Malfoozat Haji Imdadullah Mahajir Makki, Imdadul Mushtaq by Ashraf Ali Thanwi). Please note that Ghazali was born centuries after the Holy Prophet [PBUH].

    The copy of his famous Ehyaul Uloom, being used here for reference purposes, was printed by Maktaba Rahmania Urdu Bazaar, Lahore, and translated by “Maulana” Mohammad Ehsan Nanotwi. It is ironic that the very title of the book translates as “The Renaissance of All Knowledge.” As we proceed, it might occur to you that the proper title should have been, “The Demise of Common Sense.” Let us examine the heights of his flight.

    Junaid Baghdadi used to say, “I need sex as much as I need food” (Ehyaul Uloom p.53).

    Hazrat Umar Farooq used to break his fast (not by eating or drinking), but by having sexual intercourse. During Ramadhan he used to have intercourse with three concubines before Salat-il-Isha (Ehyaul Uloom 2:52).

    The best prescription for good health is to marry young women (Ehyaul Uloom 2:37).
    Men of knowledge sleep on their right side, kings sleep on their left, and Satan sleeps with his face down (reference same, p.39).

    Going for a bath without breakfast and then delaying breakfast will kill a person. I will be surprised if he survives (Ghazali quoting Imam Shafaai, reference same, p.39). There are no surprises in life for the mindless.

    Sahabi Maaz bin Jabl was dying of Plague. He said, “Have me married, because I hate to meet Allah while I am single” (reference same, p.42). Ah! The poor woman, marrying for instant widowhood!

    The best among my friends is the one who overeats and places big morsels in his mouth (Imam Ja’afar Sadiq quoted by Ghazali, reference same 2:12).

    The Prophet said that a piece of rug lying in a corner of the house is better than a woman who is infertile (reference same, p.48).

    A hadith says a dark woman who bares children is better than a beautiful woman who bares no children (reference same, p.49). Did you notice dark used as a synonym for ugly?

    Find a woman who is beautiful, well mannered, has big black eyes and black hair, and a white complexion (reference same, p.73). This is probably Ghazali’s dream girl who he could never attract.

    The Prophet said, “The best wives are those who are beautiful and their mehr (marital gift) is small” (reference same p.74). In actuality, the Holy Prophet advised character as first and foremost in the selection of a spouse.

    Do not marry a woman who is infertile (p.75). Ghazali does not say how he would test a woman for infertility. Didn’t Ghazali reflect that his sister or daughter could also suffer from infertility? Dear Reader, our criminals of Islam can only conceive of the woman as a wife, a bearer of children, and an object of desire. They forget that a mother, a sister and a daughter are also women. If only one of Ghazali’s parents had been infertile…

    In Ehyaul Uloom vol.2 p.52 Ghazali goes on to say, “When a man’s organ is in erection, two thirds of his mind and two thirds of his religion have departed from him.” This is the wisdom of our “Hujjatul Islam” (meaning The Testimony of Islam, a nickname for Ghazali)!

    After finishing your meal lick the cup or plate and drink its washings. That becomes a marital gift for the hoors (p.13). Are the heavenly beauties such a trivial bargain?
    Imam Hasan used to divorce four women and marry four women at the same hour. That is why the Prophet has said, “Hasan is from me” (p.55). According to the Holy Prophet the most undesirable among permissible acts is divorce.

    The messenger of Allah said, “No work is dearer to Allah than remaining hungry and thirsty.” Salat, Saum, and service to humanity do not come close to ascetism (Imam Ghazali, Kimiya-e-Saadat p.483).

    For centuries, Islamic preisthood has promoted rahbaniyat (ascetism) as great piety. The Holy Prophet admonished, “There is no ascetism in Islam” (several sources). The Qur’an (28:77) commands not to forget our portion in this world. You will note that non-Muslims are delighted with ascetics because their philosophy takes away the vitality of Islam.

    Kimiya-e-Saadat (the “Alchemy of Grace”) is supposedly the masterpiece of “Hujjatul Islam” (Ghazali). Mullas and Sufis have promoted this work for centuries as a fountain of knowledge. The copy used here for reference purposes is from Madina Publishing Company, Karachi, Pakistan. The translator is “Maulana” Mohammad Saeed Ahmed Naqshbandi.

    A woman who has a bad lineage (i.e. she descends from a sinful person anywhere in her family tree) is always of foul character. Therefore, it is one of the cardinal rules to abstain from marrying such a woman (Kimiya-e-Saadat p.261). Ghazali here not only violates a basic commandment of the Qur’an: “No soul shall bear the burden of another,” but also hits woman and acquits man.

    Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddiq used to carry pebbles in his mouth so that he would not speak (Kimya-e-Sa’adat p.505). Someone should have put pebbles in Ghazali’s pen!
    A saint correctly said, “I am not scared of a lion, as I am scared of a boy under puberty because of lust” (Kimiya-e-Saadat p.497).

    Prophet David fell because of his eye and committed sin with his neighbour’s wife (Kimiya-e-Saadat p.497). The Qur’an confirms that all prophets had a spotless character.

    A wife should forever remain a bondwoman to her husband. Do not let her go to the door, to the top of the house, or outside (p.265).

    Dear Reader, please note that our Mulla insists on calling Ghazali, “The Testimony of Islam”! Even an ordinary man would hesitate to inflict such cruelty upon his wife as Ghazali and Bukhari attribute to the Holy Prophet.

    On p.53 of Ehyaul Uloom, vol.2, Ghazali further insults the Holy Messenger thus: He came out of his house. On his way he saw a woman. The messenger turned back at once, went inside his house and had sex with Zainab. Then he came out and said, “Whenever a woman comes in front, she comes in the form of a Satan.” How on earth did Ghazali or any one else come to know that the Prophet (SA) did such a thing? Were the Prophet and his followers so fond of publicizing their personal relations? Our historians try to portray the Holy Prophet spending half of his time on the prayer rug and the other half in bed. This was a man who changed the course of history. God forbid, was He (SA) so obsessed with sex like these Mullas?!

    There he goes again on p.56 of the same book: Rasul complained to the angel Gabriel of his impotence. Gabriel advised “Harissa” (a herb). Ghazali and Ibnil Qayyam explain elsewhere that the herb was an important prescription since there was an army of women who could marry no one else and their desire had to be fulfilled.

    The Prophet said, “If a husband has all of his body, from head to toe, filled with pus and the wife licks him all over, even then she has not thanked him enough” (Ehyaul Uloom 2:103). Could this be the teaching of the Qur’an and the Messenger, or is it the sickness of Ghazali?

    Quoting Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal, Ghazali writes that obtaining exquisite pleasure from sex is the fortress of religion (Ehyaul Uloom 2:73). Hanbal plus Ghazali equals disaster!

    The Holy Prophet told Zaid bin Harith, “You are my brother and my maula (master).” Zaid started dancing in ecstasy (Kimya-e-Sa’adat p.419).

    An apologetic defense has been written for Ghazali in this context: “Maula” could also mean a slave. But in that case there was no reason for Zaid to rejoice because he had been a slave before. Malfoozat Makki states that Zaid rejoiced because he had given his wife Zainab to the Prophet! Ghazali advises that the health of a newborn baby will be better if the sexual encounter between the husband and the wife was vigorous (Ehyaul Uloom 2:76).

    On p.81 of the same book Ghazali insults Hazrat Umar: Umar said, “Ask women their choice in any matter and then act precisely in opposite terms. There is a blessing in doing the opposite of what women advise.”

    Hazrat Ali said, “Start your food with a breakfast of salt and Allah will remove seventy afflictions. Eating sweets causes the testicles to dangle” (Ehyaul Uloom 2:36).

    Strangely enough, it is hard to come across a Mulla who is not fond of sweets.
    Always marry a woman who gives birth to plenty of children (Ehyaul Uloom p.75, Ghazali here seeks authority from Baihaqi and Bukhari).

    Does this need any comment? Mullas ascribe such insults to the glorious name of the Exalted Prophet.

    “UNQUOTE”

  • Humayun :
    A couple of overseas PPP guys are also complaining about Nawaz Sharif’s stance;
    نواز شریف اپنے بیان پر قوم سے معافی مانگیں، خواجہ کلیم الرحمن
    مانچسٹر (پ ر) پیپلز پارٹی گریٹر مانچسٹر کے صدر خواجہ کلیم الرحمن نے کہا ہے کہ شریف برادران دو کشتیوں کے مسافر ہیں۔ شہید ذوالفقار علی بھٹو نے احمدیوں کو اقلیت قرار دیا جبکہ میاں نواز شریف نے انہیں بھائی بنالیا۔ ان کے بیان سے پوری قوم کی دل آزاری ہوئی انہوں نے کہا کہ نواز شریف اقتدار کے حصول کے لئے کچھ بھی کرسکتے ہیں۔ انہیں پوری قوم اور امت مسلمہ سے معافی مانگنی چاہئے۔
    —-
    احمدی مسلمانوں کے بھائی نہیں ہیں، تنویر گیلانی کی نواز شریف کے بیان پر تنقید
    گلاسگو (نمائندہ جنگ) پیپلز پارٹی سکاٹ لینڈ کے جنرل سیکرٹری سید تنویر گیلانی نے نواز شریف کے اس بیان پر شدید تنقید کی ہے، جس میں انہوں نے احمدیوں کو اپنا بہن بھائی قرار دیا ہے۔ سید تنویر گیلانی نے کہا کہ احمدی غیرمسلم ہیں اور ایک مسلم ریاست اپنے غیرمسلم شہریوں کی حفاظت کی پوری طرح ذمہ داری ہے۔ احمدیوں کا قتل ایک سفاکانہ عمل تھا، جس کی ہم پوری مذمت کرتے ہیں۔ ان کے خلاف کسی بھی قسم کی دہشت گردی یا ان کی عبادت گاہوں پر حملہ قطعی طور پر ناقابل قبول ہے، لیکن اسلامی طور پر احمدی مسلمانوں کے دینی بھائی نہیں۔ پاکستان کے آئین میں بھی ان کو غیرمسلم قرار دیا گیا ہے۔

    PPP [IF YOU ARE CORRECT] should do some soul searching and sack Geelanis and Shah Mehmood Quraishis, Makhdooms and Pirs from their Party because they are “Shrine Keepers” [read Grave Worshippers]

  • Our self-proclaimed demagogues

    It was bad enough that they could not unequivocally condemn the brutal massacre of nearly 100 Ahmadis in Lahore. Yet the temerity of the leaders of 13 religious and political organisations to label the attack a conspiracy aimed at repealing the discriminatory laws against Ahmadis is nothing short of morally repugnant. If ever these so-called religious leaders had any semblance of moral authority, they have ensured that none remains. In essence, what these people are saying is that the Ahmadis deserve no sympathy from their compatriots simply because their views on faith do not conform to the specifics that these so-called clerics deem within the ambit of the religion. Who appointed them the arbiters of God’s mercy? Who told them that they could create a poisonous environment where Ahmadis are barely considered human? Who told them that they could prevent the rest of us from weeping for their tragedy?

    Perhaps these so-called clerics need to be reminded that there is no clergy in Islam, no Majesterium. These people often argue against secularism by saying that there is no separation of church and state in Islam, conveniently forgetting that there is no church at all. Their arrogant insistence on becoming the guardians of other people’s faith, when they are so morally depraved that they cannot get themselves to denounce murder, is offensive to people who view Islam as their spiritual guide. Islam’s central tenet is that every human being has a direct connection to God Himself. “We are nearer to thee than thy jugular vein,” says the Holy Quran in Surah 50, verse 16. Who are they to come between man and God when the Creator of the heavens and the Earth Himself declares the need for an intermediary redundant? There is nothing more damaging to Islam and Muslims than these self-proclaimed demagogues.

    http://tribune.com.pk/story/20271/our-self-proclaimed-demagogues/

  • Kashif Naseer :
    مولویوں کی زبان چھین لیں اور تم لوگوں کو چھٹی دے دیں، خدا کا خوف کرو۔

    You should Fear Allah. And Tongues of These Mullahs should have been pulled [mercilessly too] for uttering these Blasphemous Garbage [Guddi say Zabban Khainch Leeni Chahiya]

    Read and Repent.

    Now please witness how far these Mujaddith’s of Deoband can go! See what garbage Mulla Ashraf Ali Thanwi is trying to unload. The same Thanwi whom other Mullahs call “Hakeem-ul-Ummat”!

    He writes on p.110 in “Imdaadul Mushtaq”: There was a true monotheist. People told him if delicious food is part of the person of Allaah and feces too is a part of Him, eat both. Well, the Sheikh first became a pig and ate feces. Then he became a human being and ate food! Isn’t that height of “wisdom” of our wise of the nation?”

    The wife of Mullah Jalaaluddin Rumi thought that his sexual desire had vanished. The Mullah came to know of her suspicion in a special trance of revelation (KASHF). That night he went to the wife and drilled her 70 times. (Please excuse the language) So much so that she asked forgiveness. (Manaqib-il-Arifain, p.70, by Shamsuddin Akhlaqi)

    Deobandi Gems of Wsidom “Aqwal-e-Zarrin”

    The holy messenger came to Shah Waliullah (in the 18 century!) and said, “Why do you worry? Your children are the same as mine.” (Ashraf Ali Thanwi, Hikayat-ul-Awlia)

    The prophet laid the foundation of Darul-Uloom, Deoband, India (in the 19th century) He comes to check accounts of the school. He has learnt the Urdu language. (Mubasshirat-e-Darul Uloom, and Deoband Number of the Darul-Uloom)

    Deoband Founder: Mulla Mohammad Qasim Nanotwi saw in his dream that he was sitting in the lap of Allaah. (Biography of Mulla Qasim by Mulla Mohammad Yaqoob Nanotwi)

    The advent of another Prophet is quite possible. (Mulla Abdul Hai Farangi Mahli and Mulla Qasim Nanotwi, Tahzeer-in-Nas, p.34, Athar Ibn Abbas, p.16)

    Why blame Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani only?

    Take the right arm of a goat after Friday prayers. Be completely naked. Write Sura Yasin and the name of the person you want, and then put the meat in the cooking pot. That person will fall in love with you. (Monthly “Khalid” Deoband Darul Uloom)

    If you want to kill your enemy write A to T on a piece of bread. Recite Surah “RA’AD.” Break the bread into five pieces and feed them to five dogs. Say to dogs, ‘Eat the flesh of my enemy’. By the will of Allaah your enemy will have huge boils on his body. (Darul uloom Deoband “Khalid”)

    Also by Ashraf Ali Thanvi in Aamal-e-Qurani – I wonder was Jinnah blind?

    Say “Fazabooha” before you cut a melon, or any thing else (for that matter), you will find it sweet. (Aamale-Qurani, Ashraf Ali Thanwi)

    Worst kind of Blasphemy against Quran: Recite the verse “When the heaven will split.” Write it (on a piece of paper) and tie to the left thigh of any woman in labor, child birth will become easy. Cut the hair of that woman and burn those between her thighs, childbirth will be easier still. (Aamal-e-Qurani, Ashraf Ali Thanwi)

    During labor pains let the woman hold Mawatta Imam Malik for instant delivery. (Aamal-e-Qurani, Ashraf Ali Thanwi)

    See what “Hakeemul Ummat” Thanwi says! Keep reciting “Al Mughni” during sex and the woman will love you. (Same book, Ashraf Ali Thanwi)

    Their books are full of Sorcery and Black Magic with the help of Quran. Sorcery and Black Magic is Haram in Islam. Their books are full of details as to how to make aphrodisiacs [Kushta and Tilla] for good sex.

    Here is another pearl of wisdom from him: There was a Pir Sadiq from Ashraf Ali Thanwi’s town. He taught his disciples “There is no God but Allah and Sadiq is His messenger.” {Astaghfirullaah} The wise of the nation Thanwi declared that teaching OK. (Imane Khalis, p.109, Hazrat Masood Uthmani)

    The holy messenger comes to Mulla Qasim Nanotwi and other big shots of Deoband, U.P to learn Urdu. He also checks accounts of the Madrasah. (Numerous references such as Haqaiq-o-Maarif, Deoband May 1975).

    “Maulana” Yousuf Bannuri writes: The Prophet told my father, Zakaria! When you fall sick I also fall sick. Hazrat Ali had come to conduct the marriage of my father and mother. (In the 19th century!) (Iman-e-Khalis, pp. 7 and 8, Masooduddin Usmani, Fazil Uloom Deenia)

    The great Pir (master saint) of the 19th century, Ahmad Raza Khan Barelwi, has been quoted in his Malfoozat p.32 that “Prophets are alive in their graves like ever before. They eat, drink, pray and receive their wives in the grave and engage in sex with them.”

    I hate the way these Mullahs present Islam. I wonder if these Mullah even afraid of hell in view of their activities. For more than 700 years Muslim Minority ruled over Majority in the sub-continent and the day they lost power [courtesy their own follies] they started talking in the term of Daarul Kufr and Daarul Kufr. If you would go through their books/malfozaat/tazkaray the Muslim Scholars and Sufis of the Sub-Continent received so much “Kashf/Ailham” that even the Prophets [PBUT] didn’t receive that much prophesies . Net result UMMAH. Zero+Zero=Zero=Peace Flotilla=Turks open fire on Kurd Minority and Turkey and itch for Gaza Strip.

  • The courage to speak

    Thursday, June 10, 2010
    By Kamila Hyat
    The writer is a freelance columnist and former newspaper editor

    Possibly in response to the barrage of criticism the Punjab government has faced since the attack on Ahmedi places of worship in Lahore at the end of May, the PML-N chief, somewhat belatedly, has said that the Ahmedis were “our brothers and sisters” and deserved protection as citizens of Pakistan.

    It is a pity this realisation had not dawned earlier. Had this happened, we might not have seen the massacre that resulted in such tremendous loss and such immense suffering. Till now, the PML-N has taken a somewhat ambiguous view on the question of extremism. In 1998, under the government of Shahbaz Sharif, the town of Rabwah, home to some 70,000 Ahmedis, was renamed Chenabnagar against the wishes of the majority of its residents. The move followed a resolution in the Punjab Assembly that stated the word ‘Rabwah’ should not be used for a place which was a centre of ‘Qadianiyat’. More recently, Ahmedi leaders, given a voice by the media, have pointed out that one of the militants hospitalised after the terrorist attacks was permitted by authorities to use his mobile phone and even meet his family.

    The PML-N has repeatedly condemned terrorism and suicide bombings but has been less vocal in speaking out against the Taliban or Al Qaeda as groups that promote such violence. While the attempts by the interior minister and the Punjab governor to make political capital from the Ahmedi attacks is unfortunate, it is a fact, as they have vociferously pointed out, that groups based in southern Punjab have been allowed to operate freely. What Rehman Malik does not say, however, is whether any effort is being made at the central level to undo the 1974 law, written onto the statute books by a PPP government, that instantly converted the Ahmedis into ‘non-Muslims’.

    As things stand, only three mainstream parties have taken an unambiguous position against militant outfits. The PPP, the MQM and the ANP are joined in this by a few smaller groups, but many others, like the PML-N, have been reluctant to unequivocally state their position or to condemn the Taliban and the groups affiliated with them.

    Mian Nawaz Sharif, by speaking of the citizens of Pakistan, has suggested that he may be willing to make amends for the past. We need to return to a time when all people living within the territory of the country as its nationals were regarded as equal before the law. The reversal of this basic understanding of citizenship has had a dramatic impact on the nature of our state.

    Pakistan, a nation created essentially on the basis of discrimination against a religious minority, has become one of the worst persecutors of the minorities that live on its soil. It is worth noting no other country has taken it upon itself to declare the Ahmedis ‘non-Muslim’. The precedent set is a terrifying one given the number of sects and sub-sects which exist in the country.

    What is to be seen now is if the PML-N chief’s words will be backed by a more ardent demonstration of commitment to the cause of change. This could begin by greater effort to go after southern Punjab groups. There is no doubt, after the audacious siege at Jinnah Hospital where a bid was made to either take away or kill a militant regarded as a key leader of the Taliban in Punjab, that extremist organisations have bases there. There is also evidence that they operate in others parts of the province too. Intolerance indeed has no home; it lurks everywhere.

    This Friday, as in the past, pamphlets distributed at mosques demanded death for those behind the Facebook drawing competition. We appear to see violence as the only means to deal with disagreement or a difference in belief.

    One way to challenge this mindset is to encourage more open debate and discussion from as many forums as can be found. The issue of extremism is not alone on the list of matters that need to be spoken out on. Reforms in jails, capital punishment, the examination system, curriculums, religious education at schools, corporal punishment and a whole host of other topics need to be spoken about far more frequently.

    Despite the many shortcomings of the electronic media, all of which – much like their Indian counterparts – seem to have swung towards all-out tabloidisation of the worst kind, the presence of a free media does offer advantages. Even though most of the channels and the hosts they hire stand decisively to the right of the political spectrum, people speaking out against the oppression of minorities have received airtime. Ahmedis too have gained some space. This would have been inconceivable a decade ago. The pressures exerted by those pressing for an all-out battle against extremism have certainly played a part in persuading Mian Nawaz Sharif to make a statement that surprised even some of his closest aides.

    From this point on, the Punjab government must rise above the petty gamesmanship seen recently and lead the effort to tackle extremism. Denial that militancy exists in the province is quite obviously absurd. It is important, however, that this not be turned into an issue of pride. The views expressed by Mr Sharif have forced many to think and consider their opinions. We must remember that the many who hold fiercely anti-Ahmedi beliefs, or hold the opinion that non-Muslims are in some way inferior to mainstream Muslims, are themselves victims of a system. It is this system that has churned out the extremism we now live with. Even in elite schools children are inculcated into a culture that teaches them to regard minorities as unequal citizens. It is this system then that must be challenged.

    As part of its initiative to offer people god governance, Punjab must set out the paving stones that can lead towards a changed order and demonstrate it, as a province, is genuinely committed to creating a society of equals.

    Email: kamilahyat@hotmail.com

    http://www.thenews.com.pk/print1.asp?id=244041

  • PML-N defends Nawaz’s remarks about Ahmadis
    By Amir Wasim
    Thursday, 10 Jun, 2010

    ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Muslim League-N has rejected criticism of its leader Nawaz Sharif’s remarks about Ahmadis’ rights following the suicide bombings on two mosques in Lahore last month. Mr Sharif upset religious and political circles last week after he said that “Ahmadi brothers and sisters are an asset” of the country. The former prime minister said Ahmadis were citizens of Pakistan.

    Mr Sharif may have succeeded in pacifying leaders of the Ahmadi community and other minorities who have been criticising the Punjab government for its failure to provide them protection, but this provided an opportunity to his opponents to launch a campaign against him and his party.

    PML-N spokesman Ahsan Iqbal told Dawn that the criticism was “just an act of exploitation”.

    “Nawaz Sharif said what the Quaid-i-Azam had already stated that all Pakistanis were brothers irrespective of their religion, language or caste,” he added.

    Mr Sharif’s comments drew criticism from Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam, Jamaat-i-Islami, Wafaqul Madaris, Jamiat Ahl-i-Sunnat and Al-Hadith, Jamia Banuria and Khatm-i-Nabuwat Movement, Ulema and PML-Q.

    In a statement, leaders of Wafaqul Madaris, an umbrella organisation of over 20,000 Madressahs, urged Mr Sharif to retract his statement and advised him not to “defy religion for petty political gains”.

    JUI-F leaders termed the statement a “violation of the Constitution” as it had declared Ahmadis a minority community. “The PML-N chief should seek forgiveness from Muslims all over the world,” they said.

    Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi, the PML-Q leader, said Nawaz Sharif had issued the statement to “protect his properties in the UK”.

    The participants of a recent Ulema seminar condemned Mr Sharif’s remarks and termed it an attempt to appease the US.

    Some religious leaders have even threatened to launch a campaign against the PML-N if Mr Sharif does not withdraw his statement.

    Ahsan Iqbal criticised all those who were giving ‘religious colour’ to a statement which, according to him, had been issued in the ‘national perspective’.

    He said Mr Sharif had merely emphasised that every Pakistani citizen was entitled to equal respect and rights.

    Mr Iqbal was of the opinion that it was wrong to see the remarks in the religious context. He accused Pervaiz Elahi of exploiting the issue for political gains.

    http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/the-newspaper/front-page/pmln-defends-nawazs-remarks-about-ahmadis-060

  • Nawaz Sharif’s remarks
    Dawn Editorial
    Friday, 11 Jun, 2010

    Considering that the PML-N has been seen to consort with elements belonging to banned extremist groups and is reluctant about acknowledging the Taliban threat emanating from Punjab, Mr Sharif’s comments are a welcome departure from his party’s conservative credentials. – Photo on file
    PAKISTAN
    LHC disqualifies MNA Javaid Hasnain over fake degree
    LHC disqualifies MNA Javaid Hasnain over fake degree
    It is a pity that many issues in this country tend to be viewed through the lens of religion and its attendant emotions. A principled approach, based on equal rights for all Pakistani citizens, is rarely in evidence and the result is an environment of confusion and hostility. This is borne out by the criticism faced by PML-N leader Nawaz Sharif in the wake of his condemnation of the dastardly attacks on Ahmadi places of worship last month and his reference to the Ahmadi community as an “asset” and as “brothers” and “sisters”. Considering that the PML-N has been seen to consort with elements belonging to banned extremist groups and is reluctant about acknowledging the Taliban threat emanating from Punjab, Mr Sharif’s comments are a welcome departure from his party’s conservative credentials.

    Leadership demands tough decisions which are in the greater good of the people, and that transcend narrow political considerations. Given his huge support base in Punjab, where Ahmadis are regularly targeted, one hopes that Mr Sharif’s comments will be reflected on and engender a healthy debate on the need for tolerance towards minority groups in the country.

    It is not surprising that Mr Sharif has earned the wrath of the ultra-conservatives, including the JUI-F and the JI, for his position, with some religious leaders threatening to campaign against his party if he does not retract his remarks. These are the very groups that have refrained from openly denouncing the militants responsible for mayhem and bloodshed across the country and whose religion-based politics often go against the ideals of a true democracy in which all citizens are equal.

    The Ahmadis may not be regarded as Muslims by the state and a large, vocal section of the people. But does this mean that they should be treated as second-class citizens, undeserving of any praise or even a gesture of solidarity in times of crisis? Should they be sidelined and their contributions — and let us not forget Nobel Laureate Dr Abdus Salam in this regard — overlooked? For the sake of preventing further violence and ill-will in the country, these groups should learn to keep their ideological reservations to themselves.

    http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/the-newspaper/editorial/21-nawaz-sharifs-remarks-160-sk-02

  • Farhan Q :TablighiGo through Fazail-e-Aamal and you may find many Prophets [May Allah forbid] in their literature.
    Its not the question who is right or wrong . We should have religious freedom ,Yes, in Fazail-e-Amal there are many weak ahades but does it contain hatred literature against other groups ? they guy who read Fazail Amal in Taleem every day got involve in terrorism , I never find any single hatred speech of any Tablighi Alim .
    I would appreciate any Sunni ,Shia ,Brelvi or any group as far as they are within the boundaries ,For me Religious is all about spirituality ,Good teachings can change the society.

    Read this “DEOBANDI KUFR [DISBELIEF] ” and you will certainly Laugh: “One person asked Khidr that,”Have you ever seen any wali who is better than you?” Khidr replied, “Yes, I have. I once visited the mosque of the Prophet. I saw Imaam Abdur Razzaq Muhaddith and he was teaching ahadith. The crowd and I listened to the ahadith from him. In one corner… See More of the masjid there was a youngster sitting who had kept his head between his knees away from the crowd. I said, Do you not see that ahadith of the Prophet are being taught? Why don’t you also attend the circle? He neither lifted his head nor did he look at me and said, “In that place are those who listen to ahadith from the slave of Razzaq and here are those who listen to ahadith from the Razzaq!” Hadhrat Khidr said that, “If you are indeed speaking the truth then tell who am I? He raised his head and said that, “If I am not mistaken, then you are Khidr.” Hadhrat Khidr then said, “From this I came to know that there are such wali of Allaah whom even I cannot recognize.””

    Allaahu Akbar! The pir (please notice that he has no name, no history and no background whatsoever. Just wild imaginations of Tableeghi Jamaa’at) in the above fable did not even raise his head and answered the questions of Khidr! And he listens to the Hadith from Allaah? The revelations comes down upon him? If Mirza Ghulam Qadiani makes such a … See Moreclaim all the scholars of Deobandh label him a kafir but what about the Kufr that is in their own books? Barelvis and Deobandi Tableeghi Jamaat – 3 http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2008/10/barelvis-and-deobandi-tableeghi-jamaat_4243.html

    A critical note by Saudis on Deobandis [see how united the UMMAH is?] lol

  • The advent of another Prophet is quite possible. (Mulla Abdul Hai Farangi Mahli and Mulla Qasim Nanotwi [one of the founder of Deoband, Tahzeer-in-Nas, p.34, Athar Ibn Abbas, p.16)

    Why blame Mirza when there were so many Mirza in Deoband.

  • مجھے اس میں رتّی برابر شبہہ نہیں کہ قادیانیوں کو انہی لوگوں نے قتل کیا جو مینا بازار پشاوراور مون مارکیٹ لاہور میں مسلمانوں کے قتلِ عام کے ذمہ دار ہیں۔ وہ فرقہ پرست جو القاعدہ کی مدد سے پاکستانی ریاست پر قبضے کے آرزومند ہیں ۔جن کا ایجنڈہ مذہبی نہیں، سیاسی ہے

    بعض علماء کرام نے میاں محمد نواز شریف کے ایک بیان پر ایسے آتشیں ردّعمل کا مظاہرہ کیا کہ عقل ماتم کرتی رہی۔ نواز شریف الفاظ کے انتخاب میں کبھی محتاط نہیں رہے کہ زبان و بیان کے طالب علم نہیں لیکن نوبت کفر کے فتووں تک کیوں پہنچتی؟ قادیانیوں کو انہوں نے “ہمارے بہن بھائی”کہا۔ ظاہر ہے، ان معنوں میں ہرگز نہیں کہ ایمان اور عقیدے میں ان کے ساتھ اشتراک ہے بلکہ اس لحاظ سے کہ سب ایک ہی ملک کے شہری اور آئین کے تحت یکساں حقوق رکھتے ہیں۔ گذشتہ برس سوات میں فوجی کارروائی کے ہنگام ایسے ہی الفاظ مقامی سکھوں کے بارے میں برتے جاتے رہے ، گوجرہ کے المناک سانحہ میں عیسائیوں اور ماضی میں بار ہا ہندو آبادی سے متعلق۔ تب کوئی معترض نہ ہوا، کسی نے چیخ و پکار نہ کی۔

    خود شکنی…ناتمام…ہارون الرشید
    Jang, 15 June 2010

  • Hello Web Admin, I noticed that your On-Page SEO is is missing a few factors, for one you do not use all three H tags in your post, also I notice that you are not using bold or italics properly in your SEO optimization. On-Page SEO means more now than ever since the new Google update: Panda. No longer are backlinks and simply pinging or sending out a RSS feed the key to getting Google PageRank or Alexa Rankings, You now NEED On-Page SEO. So what is good On-Page SEO?First your keyword must appear in the title.Then it must appear in the URL.You have to optimize your keyword and make sure that it has a nice keyword density of 3-5% in your article with relevant LSI (Latent Semantic Indexing). Then you should spread all H1,H2,H3 tags in your article.Your Keyword should appear in your first paragraph and in the last sentence of the page. You should have relevant usage of Bold and italics of your keyword.There should be one internal link to a page on your blog and you should have one image with an alt tag that has your keyword….wait there’s even more Now what if i told you there was a simple WordPress plugin that does all the On-Page SEO, and automatically for you? That’s right AUTOMATICALLY, just watch this 4minute video for more information at. Seo Plugin

  • Aw, this was a really nice post. In notion I would like to put in writing like this in addition – taking time and actual effort to make a especially superb article?- but what can I say?- I procrastinate alot and by no means appear to obtain something carried out.
    cheap jordans

  • An impressive share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing somewhat analysis on this. And he the reality is purchased me breakfast simply because I found it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to discuss this, I really feel strongly about it and really like reading extra on this topic. If possible, as you develop into expertise, would you mind updating your blog with extra details? It can be highly valuable for me. Huge thumb up for this blog post!
    jordans for cheap

  • Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read anything like this prior to. So nice to uncover somebody with some original thoughts on this subject. realy thank you for starting this up. this web page is some thing which is needed on the web, somebody with a small originality. useful job for bringing something new to the world wide web!
    jordans for women

  • The next time I read a weblog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as significantly as this 1. I mean, I know it was my selection to read, but I in fact thought youd have something interesting to say. All I hear is often a bunch of whining about some thing that you simply could fix if you ever werent too busy seeking for attention.
    cheap jordans

  • When I originally commented I clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now every time a comment is added I get 4 emails with the same comment. Is there any way you are able to get rid of me from that service? Thanks!
    jordans for sale

  • Aw, this was a definitely nice post. In notion I would like to put in writing like this moreover – taking time and actual effort to create a really beneficial article?- but what can I say?- I procrastinate alot and by no indicates appear to get some thing performed.
    jordan shoes for sale

  • An impressive share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing a bit analysis on this. And he the truth is bought me breakfast for the reason that I found it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and enjoy reading more on this subject. If probable, as you turn into expertise, would you mind updating your blog with additional details? It’s extremely useful for me. Massive thumb up for this blog post!
    sneakers for cheap

  • This is the appropriate weblog for anybody who wants to learn about this topic. You realize so considerably its almost tough to argue with you (not that I basically would want?-HaHa). You absolutely put a brand new spin on a subject thats been written about for years. Awesome stuff, just terrific!
    jordan retro 11

  • An impressive share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing a little analysis on this. And he in actual fact bought me breakfast given that I located it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to talk about this, I really feel strongly about it and really like reading a lot more on this topic. If achievable, as you turn out to be expertise, would you mind updating your blog with much more details? It can be highly beneficial for me. Big thumb up for this blog post!
    jordans for cheap

  • Right after study some of the blog posts on your internet site now, and I truly like your way of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark website list and are going to be checking back soon. Pls have a look at my internet web site at the same time and let me know what you feel.
    cheap jordan

  • There are actually certainly lots of details like that to take into consideration. That’s a terrific point to bring up. I offer you the thoughts above as general inspiration but clearly you can find questions like the one you bring up where probably the most vital thing is going to be working in honest fantastic faith. I don?t know if finest practices have emerged around things like that, but I am certain that your job is clearly identified as a fair game. Both boys and girls feel the impact of just a moment’s pleasure, for the rest of their lives.
    sneakers for cheap

  • beverly hills 90210 writing challenges the island of kauai is lush, Green and hot.
    You can take a boat to the Fern Grotto to see a cave overgrown with warm
    ferns. Lanai is a resort island that once were a Dole pineapple plantation. its fashion metro holiday hours michael kors handbags outlet subsequently definition synonyms naive cheap
    michael kors handbags http://www.davidfishwick.com/?brand=cheap-michael-kors-handbags.html

    Feel free to visit my site; michael kors Factory outlet online

  • http://www.chidoridesigns.co.za/oakley/Oakley-Custom-fr.html 5 years ago I told my friends that I rhodestoindependence.org/rays.asp wanted to climb Everest in 2010 but many talked me off the ledge and convinced me that it was too http://www.chidoridesigns.co.za/oakley/Oakley-Custom-fr.html risky and that I would be better off http://www.fas-break.net/read.asp playing Russian Roulette. I am sharing my draft plans with you to seek fee

  • Career Masque Lunette Oakley Pas Chere Pour De Gros Bon Marché Avec Des Prix Bas After GraduationThere are countless career opportunities you could find aft http://www.cmusa.net er the completion of graduation. It is the minimum requirement that most of the companies and colleges ask for before you get into them. Mere regular degree of graduation does not guarantee you at http://www.cosmiccomics.co.za/products/sitemap.php tractive job offers in

  • Choose A Professional Landscape Design christian louboutin uomo er In Erie Co For Getting The Best LookLandscape Design is recognized as o http://www.cosmiccomics.co.za/products/sitemap.php ne of the most important aspects of designing the property. If anyone has an extra piece of land surrounding the house then he or she might go for landscape designing, lunettes ray ban femme which in turn adds a

  • Chesapeake Bay Coatings Delivering Product Excellence To Meet Military S Lunette Ray Ban Aviator Pas Cher Noir Est Parfait Pour Vos Collectes pecsFor those that are in the military, it is essential for them Masque Lunette Oakley Pas Chere Pour De Gros Bon Marché Avec Des Prix Bas to have coatings products at their disposal that offer the ultimate in terms of high quality performance while in combat scenarios. These coatings form a number o http://www.montajestormenta.com f